Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Short-Term Effects of Fiction on Social-Cognitive Skills: The Roles of Literariness, Language Familiarity, and Narrative Experience Cover

Short-Term Effects of Fiction on Social-Cognitive Skills: The Roles of Literariness, Language Familiarity, and Narrative Experience

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Amstad, T. (1978). Wie verständlich sind unsere Zeitungen? [How comprehensible are our newspapers?] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich].
  2. Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243266. 10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
  3. Bakhtin, M. (2013). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Vol. 8). U of Minnesota Press.
  4. Bálint, K., Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Doicaru, M., & Tan, E. S. (2016). Reconceptualizing foregrounding: Identifiying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 176207. 10.1075/ssol.6.2.02bal
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the mind in the eyes” Test Revised Version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241251. 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
  6. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  7. Black, J. E. (2018). An IRT analysis of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 425433. 10.1080/00223891.2018.1447946
  8. Black, J. E., Barnes, J. L., Oatley, K., Tamir, D. I., Dodell-Feder, D., Richter, T., & Mar, R. A. (2021). Stories and their role in social cognition. In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 229250). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110645958-010
  9. Black, J. E., Ruedinger, B. M., & Barnes, J. L. (2022). The Imaginative Engagement Scale: Development of an instrument to assess cognitive elements of engaging with fiction. Media Psychology, 24(5), 583600. 10.1080/15213269.2021.2012485
  10. Bölte, S. (2005). Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Erwachsenenversion [Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Adult version]. https://docs.autismresearchcentre.com/tests/EyesTest_German.pdf
  11. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674029019
  12. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321347. 10.1080/15213260903287259
  13. Caldwell, A. R. (2022). Exploring equivalence testing with the updated TOSTER R package. PsyArXiv Preprints. 10.31234/osf.io/ty8de
  14. Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2014). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Theoretical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 14. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01055
  15. Carver, R. P. (1992). Reading rate: Theory, research, and practical implications. Journal of Reading, 36(2), 8495.
  16. Castano, E., Martingano, A. J., & Perconti, P. (2020). The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception. PloS One, 15(5), 113. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233378
  17. Castano, E., Zanella, J., Saedi, F., Zunshine, L., & Ducceschi, L. (2023). On the complexity of literary and popular fiction. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 42(1), 281300. 10.1177/02762374231163483
  18. Chung-Fat-Yim, A., Cilento, E., Piotrowska, E., & Mar, R. A. (2019). Are stories just as transporting when not in your native tongue? Language and Cognition, 11(2), 285309. 10.1017/langcog.2019.15
  19. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335359. 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
  20. Council of Europe. (2023). The CERF levels. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/table-1-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-global-scale
  21. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 119.
  22. Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 17131727. 10.1037/xge0000395
  23. Eekhof, L. S., van Krieken, K., & Willems, R. M. (2022). Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(5), 17031718. 10.3758/s13423-022-02079-z
  24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 11491160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  25. Gavaler, C., & Johnson, D. (2018). The genre effect: A science fiction (vs. realism) manipulation decreases inference effort, reading comprehension, and perceptions of literary merit. Scientific Study of Literature, 7, 79108. 10.1075/ssol.7.1.04gav
  26. Green, M. C., Chatham, C., & Sestir, M. A. (2012). Emotion and transportation into fact and fiction. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 3759. 10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre
  27. Grolig, L., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Print exposure across the reading life span. Reading and Writing, 33(6), 14231441. 10.1007/s11145-019-10014-3
  28. Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.34
  29. Harash, A. (2022). The model of failed foregrounding. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(4), 594609. 10.1037/aca0000419
  30. Hayakawa, S., & Keysar, B. (2018). Using a foreign language reduces mental imagery. Cognition, 173, 815. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.010
  31. Hsu, C.-T., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2015). Can Harry Potter still put a spell on us in a second language? An fMRI study on reading emotion-laden literature in late bilinguals. Cortex, 63, 282295. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.002
  32. Igartua, J. J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications, 35(4). 10.1515/comm.2010.019
  33. Igartua, J. J., & Páez, D. (1998). Validity and reliability of an empathy and identification with characters scale. Psicothema, 10(2), 423436.
  34. Jockers, M. L. (2015). syuzhet: Extract sentiment and plot arcs from text. R package version 1.0.4. https://github.com/mjockers/syuzhet. 10.32614/CRAN.package.syuzhet
  35. Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150155. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
  36. Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377380. 10.1126/science.1239918
  37. Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2017). Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 474486. 10.1037/aca0000069
  38. Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2019). Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522531. 10.1177/1948550618775410
  39. Kidd, D., Ongis, M., & Castano, E. (2016). Transdisciplinary approaches to literature and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 4258. 10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
  40. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P. Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch. 10.21236/ADA006655
  41. Koopman, E. M. (2016). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 8298. 10.1037/aca0000041
  42. Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79111. 10.1515/jlt-2015-0005
  43. Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89112. 10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kuisdzx
  44. Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259269. 10.1177/2515245918770963
  45. Lenhart, J., & Richter, T. (2022). Does reading a single short story of literary fiction improve social-cognitive skills? Testing the priming hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. 10.1037/aca0000533
  46. Lenhart, J., Richter, T., Appel, M., & Mar, R. A. (2023). Adolescent leisure reading and its longitudinal association with prosocial behavior and social adjustment. Scientific Reports, 13(1). 10.1038/s41598-023-35346-7
  47. Lenth, R. (2023). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  48. Mak, H. W., & Fancourt, D. (2020). Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: Results from a propensity score matching analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 253. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112971
  49. Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454479. 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
  50. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173192. 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
  51. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694712. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
  52. Mendiburu, F. de. (2023). agricolae: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.3-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae
  53. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389407. 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
  54. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121138. 10.1080/01638539909545076
  55. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267296. 10.1037/a0021890
  56. Morishima, Y. (2013). Allocation of limited cognitive resources during text comprehension in a second language. Discourse Processes, 50(8), 577597. 10.1080/0163853X.2013.846964
  57. Mulder, H. N. M. de, Hakemulder, F., van den Berghe, R., Klaassen, F., & van Berkum, J. J. A. (2017). Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 129169. 10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
  58. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109120. 10.1037/aca0000089
  59. Munro, A. (2010, October 4). Corrie. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/11/corrie
  60. Munro, A. (2013). Corrie (H. Zerning, Trans.). In H. Zerning (Ed.), Liebes Leben – 14 Erzählungen [Dear Life] (pp. 181204). S. Fischer Verlag GmbH. (Original work published 2010)
  61. Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 4654. 10.1037/pspa0000064
  62. Paulus, C. (2019). Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (IRI-S D). Based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). V 7.0. Universität des Saarlandes. http://bildungswissenschaften.uni-saarland.de/personal/paulus/homepage/files/SPF-IRI-_V7.0.pdf
  63. Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405428. 10.1080/00207594.2012.743665
  64. Pilcher, R. (1985). Lalla. The Blue Bedroom and Other Stories. St. Martin’s Press.
  65. Pilcher, R. (1994). Lalla (M. Längsfeld & I. Altrichter, Trans.). In D. F. Wunderlich (Ed.), Das blaue Zimmer [The Blue Bedroom]. Rohwohlt Taschenbuch. (Original work published 1985)
  66. Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PloS One, 11(8). 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254
  67. R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  68. Remus, R., Quasthoff, U., & Heyer, G. (2010). SentiWS: A publicly available German-language resource for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 7th International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10).
  69. Revelle, W. (2022). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. R package version 2.2.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  70. Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition & Emotion, 32(1), 130144. 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
  71. Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2010). Popular fiction studies: The advantages of a new field. Studies in Popular Culture, 33(1), 2135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23416317
  72. Schwerin, J., & Lenhart, J. (2022). The effects of literariness on social-cognitive skills: Examining narrative engagement, transportation, and identification as moderators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. 10.1037/aca0000514
  73. Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559569. 10.1177/0956797614567341
  74. Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2), 99. 10.2307/3001913
  75. van der Kleij, S. W., Apperly, I., Shapiro, L. R., Ricketts, J., & Devine, R. T. (2022). Reading fiction and reading minds in early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 222, 112. 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105476
  76. van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on theory of mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1). 10.1525/collabra.117
  77. Wimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., Wittwer, J., & Ferguson, H. J. (2024). Cognitive effects and correlates of reading fiction: Two preregistered multilevel meta-analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(6), 14641488. 10.1037/xge0001583
  78. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920933. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.191 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 22
Submitted on: Aug 9, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2025
Published on: Mar 26, 2025
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Julia Schwerin, Jan Lenhart, Tobias Richter, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.