Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effects of participants’ engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC for teachers’ professional development Cover

The effects of participants’ engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC for teachers’ professional development

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Caski (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
  2. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  3. Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/MOOCsPromisePeril_Anderson.pdf
  4. Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. Routledge, London.
  5. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 1325. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf
  6. Carr, N. (2012). The crisis in higher education. Technology Review, 115(6), 3240.
  7. Carr, D. F. (2013). MOOC students attracted most by course topics. Retrieved from http://www.informationweek.com/software/mooc-students-attracted-most-by-coursetopics/d/d-id/1110976?
  8. Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. Paper presented at the LAK’13: 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Leuven, Belgium. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/36657/1/DougClow-LAK13-revised-submitted.pdf
  9. Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., & Hartmann, B. (2014). Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? In Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 11761187.
  10. Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D.W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
  11. Downes, S. (2010). What is democracy in education? Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-is-democracy-in-education.html
  12. Fischer, G. (2011). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. Interactions, 18(3), 4253.
  13. Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350
  14. Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2005). Computer–mediated learning groups. In M. Khosrow–Pour (ed.). Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (pp. 502507).
  15. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014) How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM Learning@scale conference, ACM (2014), 4150.
  16. Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Leony, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Scaffolding self-learning in MOOCs. In Cress, U. & Kloos, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (pp. 4349). Lausanne, Switzerland: PAU Education. Retrieved from http://educate.gast.it.uc3m.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Scaffolding_self-learning_in_MOOCs.pdf
  17. Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1).
  18. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 13(1), 5774. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ584310
  19. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceeding of the third international conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170179). ACM. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/~cpiech/bio/papers/deconstructingDisengagement.pdf
  20. Koedinger, K. R., Kim, J., Jia Z., McLaughlin E., & Bier, N. (2015). Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC. Learning at Scale ’15. Retrieved from http://pact.cs.cmu.edu/pubs/koedinger,%20Kim,%20Jia,%20McLaughlin,%20Bier%202015.pdf
  21. Kleinman, G., Wolf, M. & Frye, D. (2013). The digital learning transition MOOC for educators: exploring a scalable approach to professional development [online]. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/the-digital-learning-transition-mooc-for-educators-exploring-a-scalable-approach-to-professional-development/
  22. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103
  23. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202227. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531
  24. Mackness, J., Mak, S. F. J., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Dirckinck-Holmfeld L, Hodgson V, Jones C, de Laat M, McConnell D & Ryberg T. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 266-274). Aarlborg. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/Mackness.html
  25. Morris, N.P., & Lambe, J. (2014). Studying a MOOC: a guide. Palgrave MacMillan. Retrieved from https://he.palgrave.com/resources/Product-Page-Downloads/M/Morris-Studying-a-MOOC/Studying-a-MOOC-Neil-Morris-James-Lambe.pdf
  26. Murugesan, R., Nobes, A., & Wild, J. (2017). A MOOC approach for training researchers in developing countries. Open Praxis, 9(1), 4557. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.476
  27. North, S. M., Ronny R., & Max, M. N. (2014). To Adapt MOOCS, or Not? That is No Longer the Question. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 6972. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054159
  28. Onah, D.F.O., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout Rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioural Patterns. EDULEARN14 Proceedings (pp. 5825-5834).
  29. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  30. Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daume H. III, & Getoor, L. (2013). Modeling Learner Engagement in MOOCs using Probabilistic Soft Logic. In Workshop on Data Driven Education. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2013.
  31. Rosé, C. P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., & Sherer, J. (2014, March). Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCS. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 197198). ACM. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mwen/papers/p197-rose.pdf
  32. Ruberg, L.F., Moore, D.M. & Taylor, C.D. (1996). Student Participation. Interaction, and Regulation in a Computer-Mediated Communication Environment: a Qualitative Study. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 14(3), 243268. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ537913
  33. Shank, G. & Cunningham, D. (1996) Mediated Phosphor Dots. Toward a Post-Cartesian Model of Computer-Mediated Communication Via the Semiotic Superhighway. In C. Ess. (ed.). Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 2741). State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  34. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
  35. Sinha, T., Jermann, P., Li, N., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Your click decides your fate: Inferring Information Processing and Attrition Behavior from MOOC Video Clickstream Interactions. Proceedings of the 2014 Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Workshop on Modeling Large Scale Social Interaction in Massively Open Online Courses, Qatar, October, 2014.
  36. Thomas, M. J. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
  37. Triay, J., Sancho-Vinuesa, T., Minguillón, J., & Daza, V. (2016). Analyzing non-linear video usage in an introductory x-MOOC about basic linear algebra. In LASI Spain 2016, 27–28 June 2016, Bilbao, Spain. Retrieved from http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/624
  38. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics, 2015 (NCES 2016-014), Chapter 2. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=55
  39. Walker, B. K. (2007). Bridging the distance: How social interaction, presence, social presence, and sense of community influence student learning experiences in an online virtual environment (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina.
  40. Wen, M., Yang, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Sentiment Analysis in MOOC Discussion Forums: What does it tell us? In Proceedings of EDM, pages 130-137, 2014.
  41. Yang, D., Sinha T., Adamson D., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Turn on, Tune in, Drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses. In NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c134/1b4b24363dc09ba1659c448dcce8442697e6.pdf
  42. Young, J. R. (2012, December 4). Providers of Free MOOC’s Now Charge Employers for Access to Student Data. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/ProvidersofFreeMOOCsNow/136117
  43. Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ‘15), 18821895. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675217
Language: English
Page range: 433 - 447
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2017
Accepted on: Oct 17, 2017
Published on: Oct 1, 2017
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Fernanda Cesar Bonafini, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.