Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The design of an empirical cross-boundary collaborative open learning framework Cover

The design of an empirical cross-boundary collaborative open learning framework

Open Access
|Dec 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Framework for cross-boundary collaborative open learning

Commonalities of casesCase studiesCase study 1: FDOL132 University of Salford, Karolinska Institutet and Manchester MetCase study 2: CreativeHE Manchester Met, London Metropolitan University, University of Macedonia, Creative Academic and Lifewide Education networks
  • Based on academic development courses linked to existing institutional module at postgraduate level in at least one HEI

  • Cross-institutional participation of colleagues from at least two HEIs

  • Collaborative learning as choice

  • Development using freely available social media platforms

  • Openly licensed courses using a CC licence

  • Developed or co-developed by researcher

  • Facilitated by a small group of distributed facilitators from different institution

  • English used as lingua franca

Duration in weeks128
DatesSep – Dec 2013Sep – Nov 2015
Collaborative design characteristicsOptional, in small groups using PBLOptional, in small groups or pairs using a variety of pedagogical approaches agreed with learners
Course developmentCollaborative: University of Salford and Karolinska InstitutetManchester Met
Recognition for open learnersCertificate of participationOpen badges for participation
Formal study optionAt the University of Salford: approved Flexible, Distance and Online learning module at postgraduate level as part of the PgCert in Academic Practice.
At Karolinska Institutet: Part of study towards the accredited development courses 2-weeks or 5-weeks.
At Manchester Met: Part of the Creativity for Learning module, option to also use work towards FLEX 15 or FLEX 30 modules. All three are part of the MA in HE.
University of Macedonia: part of MA in Lifelong Learning
Study linked to further local engagement opportunitiesn/aLondon Metropolitan University: part of Take5 initiative.
LanguagesEnglish and SwedishEnglish and Greek
Pool of MeaningsCategories of descriptionVariationsCodes used in the outcome space (shown in Appendix 3)
5.2 Pool 1: CourseOpen learning as course organisation
  • Causing initial disorientation

  • Aiding participation

C1.1
Open learning as an activity-based experience
  • Limiting engagement

  • Fostering engagement

C1.2
Open learning as a facilitated experience
  • Lacking direction and instruction

  • Directive and controlling

  • Facilitative and supportive

C1.3
Open learning as designed for collaboration
  • Constraining

  • Enabling

  • Empowering

C1.4
5.3 Pool 2: Boundary crossingCross-boundary learning through modes of participation
  • As a valued informal learning experience

  • As a valued mixed mode learning experience

  • As a valued opportunity for recognition

C2.1
Cross-boundary learning through time, places and space
  • As a disconnected experience

  • As a continuum

C2.2
Cross-boundary learning through culture and language
  • As a barrier

  • As an enrichment

C2.3
Cross-boundary learning through diverse professional contexts
  • As initial discomfort

  • As a catalyst

C2.4
5.4 Pool 3: CollaborationCollaboration as engagement in learning
  • Selective

  • Immersive

C3.1
Collaboration as a means to shared product creation
  • Product-process tension

  • Fulfilling

C3.2
Collaboration as relationship building
  • Questioning the behaviour of others

  • Valuing the presence of others

C3.3
Language: English
Page range: 325 - 341
Submitted on: Jul 19, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 30, 2018
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Chrissi Nerantzi, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.