Individual Characteristics as Moderators in the AI Literacy–Attitude Relationship: Preservice Math Teachers
References
- Acem, Y., Arslantaş, K., Bişirici, M., & Erdoğan, K. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Social Sciences, 1(2), 12–23.
- Ağgül, E., Yalçın, S. A., & Yalçın, P. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının Metaverse ve Web 3.0 kavramı hakkındaki görüşleri. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 292–307. 10.47525/ulasbid.1246357
- Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
- Aksakal, Ş., Emre, İ., & Özbek, M. (2024). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Yapay Zekaya İlişkin Tutumlarının Belirlenmesi. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 7(1), 1–13.
- Aksekili, E., & Kan, A. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirme: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Toplum, 13(39), 525–542.
- Al-Zyoud, H. M. M. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in teacher professional development. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 6263–6272. 10.13189/ujer.2020.082265
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.
https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ - Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. 10.1007/BF02294170
- Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71–88.
- Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 818–824. 10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.008
- Aydoğdu, F. (2023). Okul öncesi eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı. In 2nd International Conference on Innovative Academic Studies (pp. 322–325).
- Aydoğdu, Ş. (2024).
Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı . In Ş. Gökçearslan & H. Durak (Eds.), Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı (pp. 312–315). Nobel Yayınevi. - Balacheff, N. (1993).
Artificial intelligence and mathematics education: Expectations and questions . In 14th Biennial of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 1–24). Curtin University. - Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Factors influencing students’ behavioral intention to continue artificial intelligence learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET 2020, pp. 147–150).
IEEE . 10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00040 - Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
- Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
- Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. 10.3390/su12145568
- Cunska, A. (2020). Effective learning strategies and artificial intelligence (AI) support for accelerated math acquisition. In European Proceedings of International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology. European Publisher. 10.15405/epiceepsy.20111.11
- Çelebi, C., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı konulu çalışmaların sistematik derleme yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 535–560.
- Delcker, J., Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2024). Evidence-based development of an instrument for the assessment of teachers’ self-perceptions of their artificial intelligence competence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 2025, 1–19. 10.1007/s11423-024-10418-1
- Diaconu, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence literacy and attitudes: relations to age, gender and education [Doctoral dissertation, National College of Ireland].
- Domínguez, G. H., Delgado, N., Campo, L., & Losada, D. (2024). Relationship between teachers’ digital competence and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Educational Research, 126, 102381. 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102381
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., … & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
- Eker, C., & Gürbüz, S. H. (2024). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematik dersinde yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik yeterlilik algıları. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(7), 513–528.
- Elçiçek, M. (2024). Öğrencilerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı üzerine bir inceleme. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 6(1), 24–35. 10.53694/bited.1460106
- Erdoğdu, F., & Cakir, O. (2024). Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ okuryazarlıklarının ve yapay zekâya ilişkin algılarının belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 63–95. 10.55107/turksosbilder.1594635
- Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
- European Commission & Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. (2017). Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life: Report. Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2759/835661
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
- Frimpong, E. (2022). Developing pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence literacy [Master’s thesis]. University of Eastern Finland, School of Computer Science.
- Galindo-Domínguez, H., Delgado, N., Campo, L., & Losada, D. (2024). Relationship between teachers’ digital competence and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Educational Research, 126, 102381. 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102381
- Gerlich, M. (2023). Perceptions and acceptance of artificial intelligence: A multi-dimensional study. Social Sciences, 12(9), 502. 10.3390/socsci12090502
- Gnambs, T., & Appel, M. (2019). Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 53–61. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.045
- Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. 10.4324/9781315121697-2
- Guan, L., Zhang, Y., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Pre-service teachers preparedness for AI-integrated education: An investigation from perceptions, capabilities, and teachers’ identity changes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100341. 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341
- Guipitacio, J. A. D., Aleman, A. V. B., Bonsubre, C. M., Galleto, J. M. T., Tapere, B. N. B., Caballo, J. H., & Caangay, R. B. (2025). The nexus between AI self-efficacy and attitude toward AI of university students in Davao City as moderated by sex. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 4(1), 1–7. 10.54536/ajsts.v4i1.3788
- Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Gürlek, Y. (2024). The effects and applications of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 125–132.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning.
- Hajam, K. B., & Gahir, S. (2024). Unveiling the Attitudes of University Students Toward Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 335–345. 10.1177/00472395231225920
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (1st ed.). Guilford Publications.
- Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign. 10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
- Hong, J., & Kim, K. (2025). Impact of AIoT education program on digital and AI literacy of elementary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 107–130. 10.1007/s10639-024-12758-0
- Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G., & Polat, E. (2024). Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7281–7301. 10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9
- Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2023). What do university students know about artificial intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100165. 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165
- Hudson, J., Orviska, M., & Hunady, J. (2017). People’s attitudes to robots in caring for the elderly. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 199–210. 10.1007/s12369-016-0384-5
- Hur, J. W. (2024).
Fostering AI literacy: Overcoming concerns and nurturing confidence among preservice teachers . Information and Learning Sciences. Advance online publication. 10.1108/ILS-11-2023-0170 - Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
- Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. 10.3102/0034654311403323
- İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). Eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı ve gelişimi. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 1–11. 10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
- Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9).
IEEE . 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570 - Kara, E. (2024). 21. yüzyıl matematik eğitiminde yapay zekâ: Teknolojik dönüşümde global stratejiler. Çocuk ve Medeniyet Dergisi, 9(15), 8–43. 10.47646/CMD.2024.334
- Karabıyık, Ü. (2024). Matematik eğitiminde yenilikçi bir yaklaşım: ChatGPT’nin rolü. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 26–46. 10.29065/usakead.1393487
- Karacan, S. B., & Çiçek, Ş. (2024). İlahiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin yapay zeka okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile yapay zekaya yönelik tutumları. Din Bilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 24(3), 259–292. 10.33415/daad.1577561
- Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir-Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. 10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
- Keleş, A. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde yapay zeka ve web tabanlı zeki öğretim sistemi tasarımı ve matematik öğretiminde bir uygulama [Doktora tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
- Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Tsang, O. (2023). Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for empowering and developing concepts, literacy and ethical awareness in senior secondary students. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4703–4724. 10.1007/s10639-022-11408-7
- Kovačević, A., & Demić, E. (2024). The impact of gender, seniority, knowledge and interest on attitudes to artificial intelligence. IEEE Access.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10666688 - Kuloğlu, A. (2023). Eğitim ve bilim (pp. 53–54). Efe Akademi Yayıncılık.
- Kuprenko, V. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Benefits, challenges, and use cases. All You Need to Know About AI in Education.
https://medium.com/towards-artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-in-education-benefits-challenges-and-use-cases-db52d8921f7a - Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100101. 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
- Liu, H., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
- Liu, Y. (2025).
Gender differences in creative workers’ general attitudes toward artificial intelligence painting tools . AI & Society. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s00146-025-02307-9 - Luckin, R. (2017). Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), Article 0028. 10.1038/s41562-016-0028
- MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
- Mart, M., & Kaya, G. (2024). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâya yönelik tutumları ve yapay zekâ okur yazarlığı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Edutech Research, 2(1), 91–109.
- Mazı, A. (2025).
Investigation of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence . In Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Education: Enhancing Teaching Practices for Future Learning (pp. 27–58). IGI Global. 10.4018/979-8-3693-3944-2.ch002 - Meher, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence as perceived by university teachers: An analysis in the light of demographic variables. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 11(3), 2908–2919.
- Mertala, P., Fagerlund, J., & Calderon, O. (2022). Finnish 5th and 6th grade students’ pre-instructional conceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) and their implications for AI literacy education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100095. 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100095
- Moon, H., Go, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, S. W. (2024). Investigating factors in artificial intelligence literacy for Korean elementary school students. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 14(4), 1226–1232. 10.18517/ijaseit.14.4.16998
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
- Onat, F. (2022). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlık becerilerinin gelişimini etkileyen öğretimsel unsurların incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100020. 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
- Özden, M., Örge, Y. F., & Meydan, E. (2025). Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapay Zeka (YZ) Tutumları ile YZ Okuryazarlıkları Arasındaki İlişki. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 15(3), 121–131. 10.47750/pegegog.15.03.13
- Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994 - Pokrivcakova, S. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence and its integration into EFL teaching and learning. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 11(3), 100–114. 10.5861/jlce.2023.11.3.100
- Polatgil, M., & Güler, A. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nicel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 99–114.
- Ramnarain, U., Ogegbo, A. A., Penn, M., Ojetunde, S., & Mdlalose, N. (2024). Pre-service science teachers’ intention to use generative artificial intelligence in inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–14. 10.1007/s10956-024-10159-z
- Rane, N. (2023). Enhancing mathematical capabilities through ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence: Roles and challenges in solving mathematical problems. SSRN. 10.2139/ssrn.4603237
- Recepoğlu, E. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam doyumları ile öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 311–326. 10.16986/HUJE.2019053943
- Reyes, R., Mariñas, J. M., Tacang, J. R., Asis, L. J., Sayman, J. M., Flores, C. C., … & Sumatra, K. (2024). The Relationship Between Attitude Towards AI and AI Literacy of University Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Higher Education, 1(1), 37–46. 10.70847/587958
- Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003
- Saha, A. (2015). Doing math with Python. Starch Press, Inc. 10.1016/S1353-4858(15)30088-X
- Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024). Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100202. 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202
- Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Vartiainen, H., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2023). A systematic review of teaching and learning machine learning in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5967–5997. 10.1007/s10639-022-11416-7
- Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014. 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
- Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992).
Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research . In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. - Sharma, R. C., Kawachi, P., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). The landscape of artificial intelligence in open, online and distance education: Promises and concerns. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 1–12.
- Somyürek, S. (2014). Öğretim sürecinde Z kuşağının dikkatini çekme: Artırılmış gerçeklik. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 4(1), 63–80. 10.17943/etku.88319
- Strzelecki, A. E., & ElArabawy, S. (2024). Investigation of the moderation effect of gender and study level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education students: Comparative evidence from Poland and Egypt. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1209–1230. 10.1111/bjet.13425
- Tan, Ç., Ceylan, Y., & Öztürk, O. (2023). Öğretmenlerin yapay zekâya karşı tutumlarının incelenmesi. The Journal of Social Sciences, 67, 72–83. 10.29228/sobider.73772
- Turgut, M. F. (1993). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme metotları. Gül Yayınevi: Ankara.
- Turğut, Ş., Turğut, B., Orhan, H., Abdulkadir, S., & Çetin, E. (2023). A review on the use of artificial intelligence applications in mathematics education. Current and Advanced Academic Studies in Educational and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–12. 10.29228/casess.73089
- Ülgen, G. (1997). Eğitim psikolojisi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, yöntemler, kuramlar ve uygulamalar. Kurtiş Matbaası.
- UNESCO. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO.
- Uyak, S., Güngör Uyak, S., Ürey, D., Keskin, Ö., Aymaz, A., & Aydın, İ. (2023). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında yapay zeka uygulamaları: Yönetici ve öğretmen görüşleri. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 9(75), 4625–4636. 10.29228/smryj.72414
- Vaerenbergh, S. V., & Suay, A. P. (2022).
A classification of artificial intelligence systems for mathematics education . In S. V. Vaerenbergh & A. P. Suay (Eds.), Mathematics education in the age of artificial intelligence: How artificial intelligence can serve mathematical human learning (pp. 89–106). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-86909-0_5 - Van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014).
Research on science teacher knowledge . In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Vol. II (pp. 862–884). Routledge. - Wang, B., Rau, P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
- Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article em2286. 10.29333/ejmste/13272
- Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M., AlAli, R., & Saleh, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Mathematics teachers’ perspectives, practices and challenges. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 5(1), 60–77. 10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004
- Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
- Yakut, İ. (2024). Yapay zekâya yönelik tutum ve dindarlık ilişkisi. Kocatepe İslami İlimler Dergisi, 7(1), 37–59. 10.52637/kiid.1426977
- Yao, N., & Wang, Q. (2024). Factors influencing pre-service special education teachers’ intention toward AI in education: Digital literacy, teacher self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Heliyon, 10(14),
e34894 . 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34894 - Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R., & Demir, R. Z. (2024). Türkiye’de yapay zekâ ve eğitim ilişkisini inceleyen lisansüstü tezlerin analizi: Bir meta sentez çalışması. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 7(1), 47–73. 10.47503/jirss.1484848
- Yilmaz, R., & Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100147. 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
- Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: An exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 318–345. 10.1002/fer3.65
- Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., & Lau, W. W. F. (2025). Students as AI literate designers: A pedagogical framework for learning and teaching AI literacy in elementary education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(3), 1–22. 10.1080/15391523.2025.2449942
- Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024).
Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education . Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2 - Zhang, S., & Chen, X. (2022). Applying artificial intelligence into early childhood math education: Lesson design and course effect. IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment and learning for engineering (TALE) (pp. 635–638).
IEEE . 10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00109 - Zhou, H., Itoh, M., & Kitazaki, S. (2021). How does explanation-based knowledge influence driver take-over in conditional driving automation? IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(3), 188–197. Retrieved from
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9351636
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.18.3.936 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 638 - 654
Submitted on: Jun 21, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 7, 2025
Published on: Aug 4, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Nazire Cigdem Mutlu, Feride Ozyildirim Gumus, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.