Exploring the Relationships among Interaction, Presence, and Engagement in Online Learning: A PLS-SEM Study
By: Seyfullah Gökoğlu and Emrah Altun
References
- Ang, J. W. J., Ng, Y. N., Lee, L. H.-W., & Yong, J. Y. (2024). Exploring students’ learning experience and engagement in asynchronous learning using the community of inquiry framework through educational design research. Education Sciences, 14(3). 10.3390/educsci14030215
- Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
- Bali, S., Chen, T.-C., Liu, M.-C., Klangrit, S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2024). Navigating interactions and challenges in online learning: A qualitative study through social presence theory. Qualitative Research Journal. 10.1108/QRJ-04-2024-0077
- Baloran, E. T., Hernan, J. T., & Taoy, J. S. (2021). Course satisfaction and student engagement in online learning amid covid-19 pandemic: A structural equation model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 1–12. 10.17718/tojde.1002721
- Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299–316. 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
- Bulando, B. S., Canico, P. J. M., Chiong, M. A. G., Edradan, A. B., Gamba, G. R. U., Grendula, F., & Lapinig, F. R. M. (2024). Social presence and interaction satisfaction: A comparison between face-to-face and online learning modalities in maritime education. Journal of Maritime Research, 21(3) 101–107.
- Burke, R. A., Jirout, J. J., & Bell, B. A. (2024). Understanding cognitive engagement in virtual discussion boards. Active Learning in Higher Education. 10.1177/14697874241230991
- Chen, L. (2023). Transactional distance and college students’ learning engagement in online learning: The chain mediating role of social presence and autonomous motivation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 2085–2101. 10.2147/PRBM.S409294
- Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N. I., Ju, B., & Tong, X. (2020). Using the community of inquiry framework to understand students’ learning experience in online undergraduate business courses. TechTrends, 64(1), 172–181. 10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9
- Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
- Dharmadjaja, P. N., & Tiatri, S. (2021). The effect of online interaction types and acceptance of technology factors on student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 570, 936–942. 10.2991/assehr.k.210805.148
- Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). 10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
- Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., Shin, C. H., & Woo, B.-D. (2021). Structural relationships among self-regulation, transactional distance, and learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 609–625. 10.1080/02188791.2020.1832020
- Duha, M. S. U., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kucuk, S. (2022). The role of prior online learning experience on student community of inquiry, engagement, and satisfaction scores. Online Learning, 26(4). 10.24059/olj.v26i4.2949
- Edumadze, J. K. E., & Govender, D. W. (2024). The community of inquiry as a tool for measuring student engagement in blended massive open online courses (MOOCs): A case study of university students in a developing country. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). 10.1186/s40561-024-00306-9
- Ergün, E., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2015). The Turkish adaptation of student’s engagements scale in online learning environment: A study of validity and reliability. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 20–33. 10.17943/etku.64661
- Fabian, K., Smith, S., Taylor-Smith, E., & Meharg, D. (2022). Identifying factors influencing study skills engagement and participation for online learners in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1915–1936. 10.1111/bjet.13221
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. 10.3102/00346543074001059
- Gao, F., Wang, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2024). Social interaction and online learning efficiency for middle school students: The mediating role of social presence and learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10). 10.3390/bs14100896
- Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Online Learning, 11(1). 10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
- Gökoğlu, S., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2024). Student engagement, community of inquiry, and transactional distance in online learning environments: A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 107–127. 10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7660
- Hair, J. F.
Jr. , Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 - Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
- Hajibayova, L. (2017). Students’ viewpoint: What constitutes presence in an online classroom? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(1), 12–25. 10.1080/01639374.2016.1241972
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
- Joo, K. P., Andrés, C., & Shearer, R. (2014). Promoting distance learners’ cognitive engagement and learning outcomes: Design-based research in the Costa Rican National University of Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1908
- Kandemir, B., & Çakmak, E. K. (2024). Transactional distance’s influence on students’ social, cognitive, teaching presence, and academic achievement. American Journal of Distance Education. 10.1080/08923647.2024.2393490
- Kangwa, D., Xiulan, W., Msambwa Msafiri, M., & Fute, A. (2024). Enhanced learning engagement through teaching presence in online distance education. Distance Education, 45(4), 497–514. 10.1080/01587919.2024.2347998
- Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Zhang, K., Ustun, A. B., & Yilmaz, R. (2024). Transactional distance perceptions, student engagement, and course satisfaction in flipped learning: A correlational study. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 447–462. 10.1080/10494820.2022.2091603
- Kay, R., MacDonald, T., & DiGiuseppe, M. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471. 10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x
- Kayode, B. K. (2018). Effect of communication management on distance learners’ cognitive engagement in Malaysian institutions of higher learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3672
- Keengwe, J., & Schnellert, G. (2012). Fostering interaction to enhance learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 8(3), 28–35. 10.4018/jicte.2012070104
- Khammat Al-iessa, A. H., Amiryousefi, M., & Afrouz, M. (2024). Relationship between Iraqi EFL students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and their attention and engagement in online classes. Teaching English Language, 18(2), 157–183. 10.22132/tel.2023.164844
- Kim, C., Costello, F. J., Lee, J., & Lee, K. C. (2025). Metaverse-based distance learning as a transactional distance mitigator and memory retrieval stimulant. Information Processing & Management, 62(1). 10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103957
- Kong, X., Liang, H., Wu, C., Li, Z., & Xie, Y. (2025). The association between perceived teacher emotional support and online learning engagement in high school students: The chain mediating effect of social presence and online learning self-efficacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(1), 1–18. 10.1007/s10212-024-00932-4
- Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2). 10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
- Lai, C.-H., Lin, H.-W., Lin, R.-M., & Tho, P. D. (2019). Effect of peer interaction among online learning community on learning engagement and achievement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(1), 66–77. 10.4018/IJDET.2019010105
- Leem, B.-H. (2023). Impact of interactivity on learning outcome in online learning settings: Ordinal logit model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15. 10.1177/18479790231203107
- Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. 10.2224/sbp.7054
- Li, F., Jin, T., Edirisingha, P., & Zhang, X. (2021). School-aged students’ sustainable online learning engagement during COVID-19: Community of inquiry in a Chinese secondary education context. Sustainability, 13(18). 10.3390/su131810147
- Li, X., Zhang, F., Duan, P., & Yu, Z. (2024). Teacher support, academic engagement and learning anxiety in online foreign language learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 2151–2172. 10.1111/bjet.13430
- Lyu, B. (2024). The effect of self-regulated learning and community of inquiry on the online learning engagement of Chinese as foreign language learners. Education Sciences, 14(7). 10.3390/educsci14070691
- Ma, J., Zheng, M., & Feng, X. (2025). A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 64. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100974
- Mazzeo, O., Monacis, L., & Contini, P. (2025). Academic success in synchronous online learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(1). 10.17718/tojde.1444067
- McCreery, M. P., Schrader, P. G., Krach, S. K., & Boone, R. (2013). A sense of self: The role of presence in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1635–1640. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.002
- Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
- Minosky, S., Aini, N. E., Justus, B., & Bali, T. (2024). The effect of video camera, microphone and chat box use on social presence and engagement in an online group activity. Online Learning, 28(4). 10.24059/olj.v28i4.4133
- Moore, M. G. (1993).
Theory of transactional distance . In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge. - Muzammıl, M., Sutawıjaya, A., & Harsası, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: The role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21. 10.17718/tojde.770928
- Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681–707. 10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5
- Ozogul, G., Zhu, M., & Phillips, T. M. (2022). Perceived and actual cognitive presence: A case study of an intentionally-designed asynchronous online course. Online Learning, 26(1). 10.24059/olj.v26i1.3051
- Öztürk, E. (2012). An adaptation of the community of inquiry index: The study of validity and reliability. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 408–422.
- Prestridge, S., & Cox, D. (2021). Play like a team in teams: A typology of online cognitive-social learning engagement. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 3–20. 10.1177/1469787421990986
- Shaw, J. P., & Chen, J. (2012). Transactional distance and teaching presence in e-learning environments. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 11(1). 10.1504/IJIL.2012.044328
- Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
- Shehzad, N., & Charles, T. (2023). Exploring the impact of instructor social presence on student engagement in online higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). 10.30935/cedtech/13823
- Starr-Glass, D. (2013).
From connectivity to connected learners: Transactional distance and social presence . In Increasing Student Engagement and Retention in e-learning Environments: Web 2.0 and Blended Learning Technologies: Vol. 6 Part G (world; pp. 113–143). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006G007 - Su, F., Zou, D., Wang, L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). Student engagement and teaching presence in blended learning and emergency remote teaching. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 445–470. 10.1007/s40692-023-00263-1
- Sun, J. C. -Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191–204. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
- Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009).
A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework . In Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks (pp. 43–57). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004 - Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 2183–2207. 10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1
- Wang, W., Wang, X., Li, S., Ma, T., Poni Liu, M. N., & Sun, H. (2024). The relationship between emotional interaction and learning engagement in online collaborative learning: Moderated mediating effect. Psychology in the Schools, 61(4), 1549–1564. 10.1002/pits.23125
- Wang, Y. (2024). The role of teaching presence in students’ behavioral engagement. Distance Education, 45(4), 515–534. 10.1080/01587919.2024.2400256
- Xiao, Y., Liu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Disentangling the mechanism of student engagement in online language classrooms from the perspective of community of inquiry. Heliyon, 10(11). 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31934
- Xu, W. (2023). Examining the relationship between adult education participant engagement and learning effectiveness using statistical analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). 10.2478/amns.2023.2.00933
- Yang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J.-C. (2021). The effects of scientific self-efficacy and cognitive anxiety on science engagement with the “question-observation-doing-explanation” model during school disruption in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 380–393. 10.1007/s10956-020-09877-x
- Yılmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2015). The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 91–105.
- Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. LearnTechLib.
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/117282 - Zhang, M., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Li, Q., & Zhao, W. (2024). Effects of real-time danmaku interaction on student engagement in live video-streaming teaching: Analyzing the mediating roles of social, teaching, and cognitive presences. Interactive Learning Environments. 10.1080/10494820.2024.2388766s
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.18.3.1045 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 604 - 619
Submitted on: Oct 24, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 21, 2026
Published on: Aug 4, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Seyfullah Gökoğlu, Emrah Altun, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.