Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Does the RAT Model Help Explain Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices in Integrating Digital Technologies in Science Education? Cover

How Does the RAT Model Help Explain Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices in Integrating Digital Technologies in Science Education?

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Bachy, S. (2014). TPDK, a new definition of the TPACK model for a university setting. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(2), 1539. 10.2478/eurodl-2014-0017
  2. Bicalho, R. N. D. M., Coll, C., Engel, A., & Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2023). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: Propositions to the SAMR model. Educational technology research and development, 71(2), 563578. 10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x
  3. Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219243. 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
  4. Crompton, H., & Sykora, C. (2021). Developing instructional technology standards for educators: A design-based research study. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100044. 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100044
  5. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433441. 10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
  6. Harmes, J. C., Welsh, J. L., & Winkelman, R. J. (2016). A framework for defining and evaluating technology integration in the instruction of real-world skills. In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Technology Tools for Real-World Skill Development (pp. 137162). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5.ch006
  7. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT–replacement, amplification, and transformation-framework. In C. M. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 16161620). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. March 19, 2006, Orlando, Florida, USA. (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22293/.
  8. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176198.
  9. Kormos, E. (2022). A comparison of preservice teacher perceptions of instructor video and text-based feedback. SN Social Sciences, 2(8), 153. 10.1007/s43545-022-00413-9
  10. Lindenbauer, E., Infanger, E. M., & Lavicza, Z. (2023). Developing the Digital Task Analysis (DTA) framework to enable the assessment and redesign of digital resources in mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 483502. 10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp483-502
  11. Luckay, M., & Marthinisen, P. (2023). Innovations in technology education toward technological literacy–a study of two high schools in South Africa. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 9, Special Issue. Technology Education on the Edge: Innovation and creative approaches. 10.15663/ajte.v9.i0.108
  12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 10171054. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  13. Mizova, B., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., & Gospodinov, B. (2021). Challenges to the development of teachers’ professional digital competences – Bulgarian perspective. In V. Pasheva, N. Popivanov, & G. Venkov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th International Conference “Applications of Mathematics in Engineering and Economics” (AMEE’20). 2333(1), 50012. AIP Publishing. June 7–13, 2020, Sofia, Bulgaria. 10.1063/5.0041818
  14. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(3), 4042.
  15. Mucho, M., Carlsen, L., & Daniele, E. (2024). The dark side of screens: Exploring impairment with the iRAT framework. Annals of Mathematics and Physics, 7(2), 182189. 10.17352/amp.000122
  16. Panakaje, N., Ur Rahiman, H., Parvin, S. M. R., Shareena, P., Yatheen, & Irfana, S. (2024). Revolutionizing pedagogy: Navigating the integration of technology in higher education for teacher learning and performance enhancement. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2308430. 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308430
  17. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational psychologist, 20(4), 167182. 10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2
  18. Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., & Mizova, B. (2025). Exploring digital pedagogical competence in Bulgarian teachers: Insights from a self-assessment survey and their impact on educational practice and research. Pedagogy, 97(6), 743759. 10.53656/ped2025-6.01
  19. Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR, getting to transformation [Presentation slides]. Hippasus. https://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/04/16/SAMRGettingToTransformation.pdf
  20. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. In Y. Punie (Ed.), Publications Office. 10.2760/159770
  21. Redmond, P., & Lock, J. (2019). Secondary pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): What do they really think?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3). 10.14742/ajet.4214
  22. Zamri, M. T., & Mohamad, S. N. A. (2024). Technology integration in education: A review and analysis of SAMR model. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3s), 61956200. 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803463S
Language: English
Page range: 347 - 364
Submitted on: Sep 22, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 19, 2025
Published on: Jun 2, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ivelina Kotseva, Roumiana Peytcheva-Forsyth, Maya Gaydarova, Elena Boyadzhieva, Isa Hadjiali, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.