References
- Adler, C., & Lalonde, C. (2020). Identity, agency and institutional work in higher education: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 121–144. 10.1108/QROM-11-2018-1696
- Åkerfeldt, A., & Björklund Boistrup, L. (2022).
Design and research: Ethical considerations . In L. Björklund Boistrup & S. Selander (Eds.), Designs for research, teaching, and learning: A framework for future education (1st ed., pp. 48–60). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096498-4 - Axe, J., Childs, E., DeVries, I., & Webster, K. (2020). Student experiences of Open Educational Practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(4), 67–75. 10.20368/1971-8829/1135340
- Bennett, A., & Guerra, P. (2023). DIY, alternative cultures and society. DIY Alternative Cultures & Society, 1(1), 3–6. 10.1177/27538702221134896
- Bhatia, K. V., Pathak-Shelat, M., & Arora, P. (2023). DIY education in the digital era: Youth-driven learning strategies and curricula for the future of work opportunities. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1407–1426. 10.1007/s10639-023-11750-4
- Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2025). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: Recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science. 10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
- Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85–124.
- Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1–10. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
- Bozkurt, A. (2025). AI’s thirst, AI’s heat, AI’s waste: Exposing the hidden environmental impact of every artificial intelligence interaction. Open Praxis, 17(4), 638–647. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.4.1058
- Brailas, A. (2020). Rhizomatic learning in action: A virtual exposition for demonstrating learning rhizomes. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20),
October 21–23, 2020 , Salamanca, Spain (pp. 1–6).ACM . 10.1145/3434780.3436565 - Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, 14. 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
- Butson, R., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2024). AI and its implications for research in higher education: A critical dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 563–577. 10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200
- Chávez, J., Fauré, J., & Barril Madrid, J. (2022). The role of agency in the construction and development of professional identity. Learning: Research and Practice. 10.1080/23735082.2022.2134575
- Chen, B. (2019). Designing for networked collaborative discourse: An unLMS approach. TechTrends, 63(2), 194–201. 10.1007/s11528-018-0284-7
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
- Dines, M. (2023). Finding Freire: Punk, praxis, and the quest for spirituality in Krishnacore. Religions, 14, 1263. 10.3390/rel14101263
- Elofsson, A., Kretsch, R. C., Magnus, M., & Montelione, G. T. (2025). Engaging the community: CASP special interest groups. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 0(1), 1–3. 10.1002/prot.26833
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury.
- Gibbons, A., & Snake-Beings, E. (2018). DiY (Do-it-Yourself) pedagogy: A future-less orientation to education. Open Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 28–42. 10.1080/23265507.2018.1457453
- Glass, R. D. (2001). On Paulo Freire’s philosophy of praxis and the foundations of liberation education. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 15–25. 10.3102/0013189X030002015
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
- Gunbayi, I. (2024). Rigor in qualitative research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 1–7. 10.5281/zenodo.13256320
- Hanshaw, G., Vance, J., & Brewer, C. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of AI course assistants on the student learning experience. Open Praxis, 16(4), 627–644. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.719
- Harper, H., & Parkin, B. (2024). A subversive pedagogy to empower marginalised students: An Australian study. Educational Review, 76(1), 116–131. 10.1080/00131911.2023.2175793
- Hickey-Moody, A. (2015).
Manifesto: The rhizomatics of practice as research . In A. Hickey-Moody & T. Page (Eds.), Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms (pp. 169–192). Rowman & Littlefield International. 10.5040/9798881809713.ch-009 - Honan, E. M., & Sellers, M. (2007).
So how does it work? Rhizomatic methodologies . In P. L. Jeffery (Ed.), AARE 2006 international education research conference: Engaging pedagogies (pp. 1–9). Australian Association for Research in Education. - Kibler, A., Valdés, G., & Walqui, A. (Eds.). (2021). Reconceptualizing the role of critical dialogue in American classrooms: Promoting equity through dialogic education. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429330667
- Köhler, T., Rumyantseva, M., & Welch, C. (2023). Qualitative restudies: Research designs for retheorizing. Organizational Research Methods, 28(1), 32–57. 10.1177/10944281231216323
- Lawrence, P. (2019). Dialogical agency: Children’s interactions with human and more-than-human. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(3), 318–333. 10.1080/1350293X.2019.1600802
- Logan, S. W., Sloane, B. M., & Chandler, K. D. (2024). Punk pedagogy in a course about punk: A qualitative study of undergraduate students’ experiences. Research in Education. 10.1177/00345237241311023
- Maffie, M. D. (2020). The role of digital communities in organizing gig workers. Industrial Relations, 59(1), 123–149. 10.1111/irel.12251
- McKee, D. (2024).
Band praxis: Punk and the anarchist squint . In J. Donaghey, W. Boisseau, & C. Kaltefleiter (Eds.), DIY OR DIE! Do-It-Yourself, Do-It-Together & Punk Anarchism (pp. 359–386). Active Distribution. - Mossberger, K., & Tolbert, C. J. (2021). Digital citizenship and digital communities: How technology matters for individuals and communities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(3), 1–19. 10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa2
- Mpuangnan, K. N., & Ntombela, S. (2024). Community voices in curriculum development. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(1), 49–60. 10.1007/s41297-023-00223-w
- Murphy, A., Mahdinejad, M., Ahmad, S. S., Kenny, J., & Ventresque, A. (2024).
Optimising a peer-based learning environment . In Generative Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 386–394). Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-63028-6_33 - Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. 10.1177/1609406917733847
- Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education, and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. 10.1080/02680930500108718
- Rust, J. (2018). Traditional action and traditional authority. Mws, 18(2), 159–185. 10.15543/Mws/2018/2/3
- Sánchez-Valero, J.-A., Arrazola-Carballo, J., & Calderón-Garrido, D. (2017). The DIYLab project (Do It Yourself in Education: Expanding Digital Competence to Foster Student Agency and Collaborative Learning) / El proyecto DIYLab (Do It Yourself in Education: Expanding Digital Competence to Foster Student Agency and Collaborative Learning). Cultura y Educación, 29(4), 871–878. 10.1080/11356405.2017.1383637
- Sancho-Gil, J. M., Hernández-Hernández, F., & Fendler, R. (2015). Envisioning DIY learning in primary and secondary schools. Seminar.net, 11(1). 10.7577/seminar.2366
- Serbes, H., Güzel, M., Gönden, M., & Kabaş, B. (2025). From underground publishing to the present: A multidimensional analysis of punk fanzine culture in Turkey. Punk & Post-Punk, 14(2), 165–186. 10.1386/punk_00291_1
- Silveira, F., & Conter, M. B. (2015).
“Do it yourself”: Daniel Johnston’s demon . In P. Guerra & T. Moreira (Eds.), Keep it simple, make it fast! An approach to underground music scenes (Vol. 1, pp. 49–58). Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Letras. - Stewart, F., & Way, L. (2023). Beyond boundaries? Disability, DIY and punk pedagogies. Research in Education, 115(1), 11–28. 10.1177/00345237231160301
- Weber, M. (2003).
Basic sociological concepts . In S. Whimster (Ed.), The essential Weber: A reader (pp. 311–358). Routledge. - Zawacki-Richter, O., Cefa, B., & Bai, J. Y. H. (2025). Towards reproducible systematic reviews in Open, Distance, and Digital Education—An umbrella mapping review. Review of Education, 13(1), Article
e70031 . 10.1002/rev3.70031
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.18.1.945 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 131
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2025
Published on: Feb 24, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Hüseyin Serbes, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.