Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Proctoring Online Assessments: Enhancing Security and Academic Integrity in Open Distance eLearning Cover

Proctoring Online Assessments: Enhancing Security and Academic Integrity in Open Distance eLearning

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Al-Zoubi, A., Dmour, M., & Aldmour, R. (2022). Blockchain as a learning management system for laboratories 4.0. iJOE, 18(12), 17. 10.3991/ijoe.v18i12.33515
  2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Badaru, K. A., & Adu, E. O. (2022). Platformisation of Education: An Analysis of South African Universities’ Learning Management Systems. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 7(2), 6686. 10.46303/ressat.2022.10
  4. Blignaut, S., Visser, A., Maistry, S., Simmonds, S., Pheiffer, G., Le Grange, L., & Ramrathan, L. (2022). Belonging, wellbeing, and stress with online learning during COVID-19. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(6), 169191. 10.20853/36-6-5525
  5. Brown, B. F., & Brown, Y. (1994). Distance Education around the world. In B. Willis (Ed.), Educational Technology (1994). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  6. Crowdmark. (2020). Crowdmark is a collaborative online grading and analytics platform. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://crowdmark.com
  7. Evans, D. (2011). Introduction to Computing: Explorations in Language, Logic, and Machines, pp. 2. Richmond, VA: Creative Common.
  8. Gilbert, C. (2022) Advantages and disadvantages of online examination system. https://cirrusassessment.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-online-examination-system/ (Accessed 16 September 2023).
  9. Hauer, T. (2017, September). Education, Technology and Technical Images. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (pp. 251255). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/icsshe-17.2017.63
  10. Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021, July). Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 639814). Frontiers Media SA. 10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
  11. Hollister, K. K., & Berenson, M. L. (2009). Proctored versus unproctored online exams: Studying the impact of exam environment on student performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 271294. 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x
  12. Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An evaluation of online proctoring tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509525. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1113
  13. Hylton, K., Levy, Y., & Dringus, L. P. (2016). Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams. Computers & Education, 92, 5363. 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.002
  14. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Lee, K. (2021). Openness and innovation in online higher education: A historical review of the two discourses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(2), 112132. 10.1080/02680513.2020.1713737
  16. Lee, K., & Fanguy, M. (2022). Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration? British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 475490. 10.1111/bjet.13182
  17. Majola, M. X., & Mudau, P. K. (2022) Lecturers’ Experiences of Administering Online Examinations at a South African Open Distance E-Learning University during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 275283. 10.12973/ijem.8.2.275
  18. Mak, V., Krishnan, S., & Chuang, S. (2022, February). Students’ and examiners’ experiences of their first virtual pharmacy objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 328). MDPI. 10.3390/healthcare10020328
  19. McKenna, S. (2022). Neoliberalism’s conditioning effects on the university and the example of proctoring during COVID-19 and since. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(5), 502515. 10.1080/14767430.2022.2100612
  20. Mcleod, S. (2022). Lev Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development. Simply Psychology.
  21. Namlu, A. G., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007). Unethical Computer Using Behavior Scale: A Study of Reliability and Validity on Turkish university Students. Comput. Edu., 48(2), 205215. 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006
  22. Nasr, N. (2020). Teachers as Students:: Adapting to Online Methods of Instruction and Assessment in the Age of COVID-19. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 168171.
  23. Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., & Churi, P. (2021). A systematic review on ai-based proctoring systems: Past, present and future. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 125. 10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x
  24. Pandit, D., & Agrawal, S. 2022. Exploring challenges of online education in COVID times. FIIB Business Review, 11(3): 263270. 10.1177/2319714520986254
  25. Phuthela, N., & Dwivedi, S. (2020). A qualitative study of students’ perspective on e- learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 545559. 10.1108/JARHE-02-2019-0041
  26. Prisacari, A. A., & Danielson, J. (2017). Computer-based versus paper-based testing: Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 110. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.044
  27. Ryu, R., Yeom, S., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Continuous multibiometric authentication for online exam with machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 Australasian conference on information systems (pp. 17).
  28. Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution – What It Means and How to Respond. Davos, Switzerland: Snapshot.
  29. Selwyn, N., O’Neill, C., Smith, G., Andrejevic, M., & Gu, X. (2023). A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia, 186(1), 149164. 10.1177/1329878X211005862
  30. Taylor, P., & Maor, D. (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist Online Learning Environment Survey. In 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum.
  31. UNESCO. (2001). Guidelines for Teacher Education at a Distance. Paris: UNESCO.
  32. UNISA. (2008). Open Distance Learning Policy. UNISA Press: Pretoria.
  33. Veblen, T. (2013). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, pp. 7787. The USA: Macmillan.
  34. Verhoef, A. H., & Coetser, Y. M. (2021). Academic integrity of university students during emergency remote online assessment: An exploration of student voices. 10.4102/the.v6i0.132
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  36. Wahid, A., Sengoku, Y., & Mambo, M. (2015). Toward Constructing A Secure Online Examination System. In Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (Bali, Indonesia: IEEE). 10.1145/2701126.2701203
Language: English
Page range: 680 - 690
Submitted on: Apr 21, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 16, 2025
Published on: Nov 25, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Mncedisi Christian Maphalala, Ntombikayise Nkosi, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.