Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Multi-Year Impact of Canada’s First Zero Textbook Cost Initiative Cover

The Multi-Year Impact of Canada’s First Zero Textbook Cost Initiative

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Ainsworth, B., Allen, N., Dai, J., Elder, A., Finkbeiner, N., Freeman, A., Hare, S., Helge, K., Helregel, N., Hoover, J., Kirschner, J., Perrin, J., Ray, J., Raye, J., Reed, M., Schoppert, J., & Thompson, L. (2020). Marking open and affordable courses: Best practices and case studies. Mavs Open Press. Retrieved from https://uta.pressbooks.pub/markingopenandaffordablecourses/chapter/effects-of-course-marking-initiatives/
  2. Allen, N. (2018). $1 billion in savings through open educational resources. SPARC. Retrieved from https://sparcopen.org/%20news/2018/1-billion-in-savings-through-open-educational-resources/
  3. Ashman, M. (2023). Faculty and student perceptions of open pedagogy: A case study from British Columbia, Canada. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association (OTESSA) Journal, 3(2), 129. 10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.40
  4. Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 112. 10.5334/jime.565
  5. Bliss, T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), 4. 10.5334/2013-04
  6. Boyle, C. (2023). Reviewing a 5-year grant-funded campus OER initiative: Reflections, successes, & challenges. Open Praxis, 15(3), 226234. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.562
  7. Brandle, S., Katz, S., Hays, A., Beth, A., Cooney, C., DiSanto, J., Miles, L., & Morrison, A. (2019). But what do the students think: Results of the CUNY cross-campus zero-textbook cost student survey. Open Praxis, 11(1), 85. 10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.932
  8. Clinton-Lisell, V., & Kelly, A. (2024). The role of open education and faculty gender in shaping student perceptions. Open Praxis, 16(4), 567582. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.733
  9. Clinton-Lisell, V. E., Roberts-Crews, J., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). SCOPE of Open education: A new framework for research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 135153. 10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7356
  10. Clinton, V. (2018). Savings without sacrifice: a case report on open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 177189. 10.1080/02680513.2018.1486184
  11. Clinton, V. (2019). Cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions of open educational resources in psychology: A Narrative Review of the Literature. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 420. 10.1177/1475725718799511
  12. Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419872212. 10.1177/2332858419872212
  13. Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E., & Park, H. (2018). The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262276. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3386.pdf
  14. Contrada, C., & Good-Schiff, K. (2021). Ladders in the orchard: What’s next for OER? College & Research Libraries News, 82(3), 132. 10.5860/crln.82.3.132
  15. Correa, E., & Bozarth, S. (2023). To eat or to learn? Wagering the price tag of learning: Zero cost textbook degree. Equity in Education & Society, 2(2), 126137. 10.1177/27526461231154013
  16. Cox, G., Masuku, B., & Willmers, M. (2020). Open textbooks and social justice: Open educational practices to address economic, cultural and political injustice at the University of Cape Town. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 2. 10.5334/jime.556
  17. Diaz Solodukhin, L., MacDonald, M., Falkenstern, C., Lane, P., & Jones, K. (2025) No-cost/Low-cost and OER impact on time-to-credential: An event history modeling study. Journal of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education, 3(1), 130148. 10.31274/joerhe.17772
  18. Dill, D. (2022). Access and Iiequality in US higher education: Policy issues. In O. Tavares, C. , C. Sin, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Equity Policies in Global Higher Education. (pp. 4770). Springer International Publishing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-69691-7_3
  19. Draper, D., Mayes, L., & Payne, B. (2023). From high school to community college to ODU to the C-suite: creating a text-book free pathway to a bachelor’s Z-degree. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 38(1), 5872. 10.1080/02680513.2020.1850249
  20. Dubick, J., Mathews, B., & Cady, C. (2016). Hunger on campus- The challenge of food insecurity for college students. Retrieved from https://studentsagainsthunger.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Hunger_On_Campus.pdf
  21. Engler, J. N., & Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R. (2019). Facilitating student success: The role of open educational resources in introductory psychology courses. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 3647. 10.1177/1475725718810241
  22. Fischer, L., Hilton, III, J., Clinton-Lisell, V., Xiong, Y., Wiley, D., & Williams, L. (2021). The interaction of open educational resources use and course difficulty on student course grades in a community college. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 4(1), 922. https://ijoer.scholasticahq.com/article/25238-the-interaction-of-open-educational-%20resources-oer-use-and-course-difculty-on-student-course-grades-in-a-community-college
  23. Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159172. 10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x
  24. Florida Virtual Campus. (2016). 2016 Student textbook and course materials survey. Retrieved from https://florida.theorangegrove.org/og/items/3a65c507-2510-42d7-814c-ffdefd394b6c/1/
  25. Florida Virtual Campus. (2018). 2018 Student textbook and course materials survey. Retrieved from https://assets.website-files.com/646e59f2d76c6e8c0c5223de/651ed916079423d264335a68_2018%20Student%20Textbook%20and%20Course%20Materials%20Survey%20Report%20--%20FINAL%20VERSION%20--%2020190308.pdf
  26. Florida Virtual Campus. (2022). 2022 Student textbook and course materials survey. Retrieved from https://www.flbog.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Textbook-Survey-Report.pdf
  27. Glymour, M. M., Weuve, J., & Chen, J. T. (2008). Methodological challenges in causal research on racial and ethnic patterns of cognitive trajectories: Measurement, selection, and bias. Neuropsychology Review, 18(3), 194213. 10.1007/s11065-008-9066-x
  28. Gnaldi, M., Tomaselli, V., & Forcina, A. (2018). Ecological fallacy and covariates: New insights based on multilevel modelling of individual data. International Statistical Review, 86(1), 119135. 10.1111/insr.12244
  29. Griffiths, R., Mislevy, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Encouraging impacts of an open education resource degree initiative on college students’ progress to degree. Higher Education, 84(5), 10891106. 10.1007/s10734-022-00817-9
  30. Grimaldi, P. J., Basu Mallick, D., Waters, A. E., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2019). Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0212508. 10.1371/journal.pone.0212508
  31. Grissett, J. O., & Huffman, C. (2019). An open versus traditional psychology textbook: student performance, perceptions, and use. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 2135. 10.1177/1475725718810181
  32. Hahn, A. (2024, April 18). 2025 Student loan debt statistics: Average student loan debt. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/student-loans/average-student-loan-debt-statistics/
  33. Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2020). The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 365379. 10.1037/met0000239
  34. Hardin, E. E., Eschman, B., Spengler, E. S., Grizzell, J. A., Moody, A. T., Ross-Sheehy, S., & Fry, K. M. (2019). What happens when trained graduate student instructors switch to an open textbook? A controlled study of the impact on student learning outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 4864. 10.1177/1475725718810909
  35. Hendricks, C., Reinsberg, S. A., & Rieger, G. W. (2017). The adoption of an open textbook in a large physics course: An analysis of cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3006
  36. Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 573590. 10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
  37. Hilton, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 853876. 10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
  38. Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the global south. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). 10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.312
  39. Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannans, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 3. 10.5334/jime.549
  40. Jhangiani, R., & Pakkal, O. (2023, February 16). Impact of KPU’s zero textbook cost program. 10.17605/OSF.IO/X294S
  41. Jhangiani, R., Pakkal, O., Lachaîne, C., & Luke, R. (2024). On a path to open: A report on the capacity of Ontario’s post-secondary institutions to support open educational practices. Inclusive Education Research Lab & eCampus Ontario. https://www.ecampusontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/On-a-Path-to-Open-EN-tagged.pdf
  42. Jhangiani, R. S., Dastur, F. N., Le Grand, R., & Penner, K. (2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1). 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5
  43. Jhangiani, R. S., & Jhangiani, S. (2017). Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3012
  44. Jhangiani, R. S., Pitt, R., Hendricks, C., Key, J., & Lalonde, C. (2016). Exploring faculty use of open educational resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions. BCcampus Research Report. Victoria, BC: BCcampus. https://bccampus.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/BCFacultyUseOfOER_final.pdf
  45. Johnson, N., & Seaman, J. (2021). The growth of online learning and digital learning resources in Canadian post-secondary education. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. Retrieved from https://mobile.eduq.info/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11515/38619/2021-special-topics-report.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  46. Kwantlen Polytechnic University. (2017, Nov 1). KPU unveils sweet suite of courses with no-cost textbooks. KPU News. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.ca/news/2017/11/01/kpu-unveils-sweet-suite-courses-no-cost-textbooks
  47. Kwantlen Polytechnic University. (n.d.). KPU facts. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.ca/about/facts
  48. Kwantlen Polytechnic University. (n.d.). Zero textbook cost. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.ca/ztc
  49. Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). 10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290
  50. Lambert, S. R., & Fadel, H. (2022). Open textbooks and social justice: a national scoping study. Retrieved from https://www.acses.edu.au/research-policies/15394-2-2/
  51. Levy, D., & Tila, D. (2022) An overlooked benefit of OER: Showing students we care. International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce, 3, 199204. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED620160.pdf
  52. Lindstrom, H. A. (2021). Instructor characteristics and student achievement: Do student perceptions of teacher attributes impact their success? [Master’s thesis, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. Retrieved from https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/403
  53. Magro, J., & Tabaei, S. V. (2019). Results from a psychology OER pilot program: faculty and student perceptions, cost savings, and academic outcomes. Open Praxis, 12(1), 83. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1007
  54. Martin, A. M. (2017). The impact of instructor qualities in higher education online courses [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1510782448483627
  55. Mayer, J. (2023). Open educational resources (OER) efficacy and experiences: A mixed methods study. Libraries and the Academy, 23(4), 773798. 10.1353/pla.2023.a908701
  56. Moerbeek, M. (2004). The consequence of ignoring a level of nesting in multilevel analysis. Multivariate behavioral research, 39(1), 129149. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_5
  57. Nagashima, T., & Hrach, S. (2021). Motivating factors among university faculty for adopting open educational resources: Incentives matter. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 19, 110. 10.5334/jime.678
  58. Neu-Stephens, H. (2020). Open education resources and enrollment intensity in one Southern California community college. National American University. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414027514?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
  59. Nickerson, C. (2025). Implementing a Z-course program at Fort Hays State University. Journal of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education, 3(1), 157178. 10.31274/joerhe.17969
  60. Nusbaum, A. T., & Cuttler, C. (2020). Hidden impacts of OER: Effects of OER on instructor ratings and course selection. Frontiers in Education, 5, 72. 10.3389/feduc.2020.00072
  61. Nusbaum, A. T., Cuttler, C., & Swindell, S. (2020). Open educational resources as a tool for educational equity: Evidence from an introductory psychology class. Frontiers in Education, 4, 152. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00152
  62. Pakkal, O., Jhangiani, R., Twele, A., & Gwozdz, L. (2024, November). Students’ perceptions of a course syllabus designed to foreground open educational practices. Oral Presentation at the 2024 Open Education Conference, Providence, RI, USA. 10.4337/9781035311293.00049
  63. Perry, M. (2022, July 23). Chart of the day … or century? American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-or-century-6/
  64. Pfannenstiel, A., Redcay, A., & Albert, D. (2020). Student perceptions of textbooks: Prior behaviors and beliefs can Influence zero textbook cost (ZTC) adoption impact. Open Praxis, 12(4), 555. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1119
  65. Ross, H. M., Hendricks, C., & Mowat, V. (2018). Open textbooks in an introductory sociology course in Canada: Student views and completion rates. Open Praxis, 10(4), 393. 10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.892
  66. Sansom, R. L., Clinton-Lisell, V., & Fischer, L. (2021). Let students choose: Examining the impact of open educational resources on performance in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 745755. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00595
  67. Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2023). Digitally established: Educational resources in US higher education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED639323.pdf
  68. Smith, N. D., Grimaldi, P. J., & Basu Mallick, D. (2020). Impact of zero cost books adoptions on student success at a large, urban community college. Frontiers in Education, 5, 579580. 10.3389/feduc.2020.579580
  69. Spavor & Grey. (2024). KPU ZTC data dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.ca/open/ztc
  70. Strauss, J., & Cordice-Litte, B. (2021). Student textbook and course material survey. SUNY Open Access Repository. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/1840
  71. Swaak, T. (2023, July 19). The homework tax. The Chronicle Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-homework-tax
  72. Tasca, G. A., & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 429437. 10.1080/10503300802641444
  73. Tijerina, T. (2024). Pedagogy opened-innovative theory and practice. Open ALG. Retrieved from https://alg.manifoldapp.org/projects/pedagogy-opened
  74. Tila, D., & Levy, D. (2022). Open educational resources adoption reduces textbook costs without sacrificing student performance in business and economics courses at a community college. Social Education Research, 4(1), 122130. 10.37256/ser.4120231842
  75. Trust, T., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2023). College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 353371. 10.1177/14697874221081454
  76. UNESCO. (2019). Recommendation on open educational resources (OER). Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer
  77. Versluis, A., Martin, H., Ward, R., Green, N., Cheskes, R., & Cassidy, M. (2017). #TextbookBroke: Findings of a University of Guelph Student Survey on Textbook Purchasing Behaviours and Outcomes. Retrieved from https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/items/12d2a277-ddb9-4702-a5e5-9380a91a20f8
  78. Vitez, K. (2020). Automatic textbook billing: An offer students can’t refuse? U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Retrieved from http://pirg.org/edfund/resources/automatictextbook-billing-2/
  79. Vojtech, G., & Grissett, J. (2017). Student perceptions of college faculty who use OER. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3032
  80. Walker, J. T. (2021). Ecological fallacy. In J. C. Barnes & D. R. Forde (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice (1st ed., pp. 478482). Wiley. 10.1002/9781119111931.ch98
  81. Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R. C. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
  82. Wiley, D., Williams, L., DeMarte, D., & Hilton, J. (2016). The Tidewater Z-degree and the INTRO Model for Sustaining OER adoption. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 41. 10.14507/epaa.24.1828
  83. Winitzky-Stephens, J. R., & Pickavance, J. (2017). Open educational resources and student course outcomes: A multilevel analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3118
  84. Witte, J., & Didelez, V. (2019). Covariate selection strategies for causal inference: Classification and comparison. Biometrical Journal, 61(5), 12701289. 10.1002/bimj.201700294
  85. Wong, A. (2023, June 18). How student loans keep some people trapped in debt. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/student-loans-debt-trap-1.6877888
  86. Yaremych, H. E., Preacher, K. J., & Hedeker, D. (2023). Centering categorical predictors in multilevel models: Best practices and interpretation. Psychological Methods, 28(3), 613630. 10.1037/met0000434
  87. Zajacova, A., & Siddiqi, A. (2022). A comparison of health and socioeconomic gradients in health between the United States and Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 306, 115099. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115099
Language: English
Page range: 326 - 348
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 28, 2025
Published on: Jul 10, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Rajiv Jhangiani, Oya Pakkal, Xiaoyang Xia, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.