Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Framework for Establishing Social Presence Through the Combination of AI-generated Text with Human-created Video Cover

A Framework for Establishing Social Presence Through the Combination of AI-generated Text with Human-created Video

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Aksoy, D. A., & Kursun, E. (2024). Behind the scenes: A critical perspective on GenAI and Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 16(3), 457470. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.3.674
  2. Aloni, M., & Harrington, C. (2018). Research based practices for improving the effectiveness of asynchronous online discussion boards. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 271289. 10.1037/stl0000121
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 117. 10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
  4. Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/54615/; 10.9743/JEO.2009.1.1
  5. Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548
  6. Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021) Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
  7. Bahula, T., & Kay, R. (2021). Exploring student perceptions of video-based feedback in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(4), 248258. 10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4224
  8. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Electronic Journal, 7, 5262. 10.2139/ssrn.4337484
  9. Barbaro, M. (Host). (2023, June 28). Suspicion, cheating and bans: AI hits America’s schools [Audio podcast episode]. In The Daily. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/28/podcasts/the-daily/ai-chat-gpt-schools.html?
  10. Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369385. 10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
  11. Black, A. (2005). The use of asynchronous discussion: Creating a text of talk. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1), 524. http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss1/languagearts/article1.cfm
  12. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195203. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001
  13. Borup, J., West, R. E., Thomas, R. A., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 232256. 10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1821
  14. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., & Honeychurch, S., et al. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487513. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777
  15. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 2847. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
  16. Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 5(3). 10.34105/j.kmel.2013.05.021
  17. Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: Survey analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, 111. 10.2196/47184
  18. Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 4869. 10.24059/olj.v19i3.668
  19. Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 323325. 10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00100
  20. Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies : A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228241. 10.1080/08923647.2013.837651
  21. Delmas, P. M. (2017). Using VoiceThread to create community in online learning. TechTrends, 61, 595602. 10.1007/s11528-017-0195-z
  22. Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
  23. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. V. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 842849. 10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013
  24. Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135153. 10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
  25. Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., & Lameras, P. (2023, September). Designing educational escape rooms with Generative AI: A framework and ChatGPT prompt engineering guide. 17th European Conference on Games Based Learning. 10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1870
  26. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87105. 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  27. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 321). Pfeiffer.
  28. Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 1333). New York: Routledge.
  29. Griffiths, M. E., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Using asynchronous video in online classes: Results from a pilot study. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(3), 6576.
  30. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1(2), 147166.
  31. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 826. 10.1080/08923649709526970
  32. Guo, C., Shea, P., & Chen, X. (2022). Investigation on graduate students’ social presence and social knowledge construction in two online discussion settings. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 27512769. 10.1007/s10639-021-10716-8
  33. Haerawan, H., Cale, W., & Barroso, U. (2024). The Effectiveness of Interactive Videos in Increasing Student Engagement in Online Learning. Journal of Computer Science Advancements, 2(5), 244258. 10.70177/jsca.v2i5.1322
  34. Harasim, L. (1986). Educational applications of computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 1(1), 5970. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/305
  35. Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(2), 117135. 10.21432/T2TK6K
  36. Harasim, L. M. (Ed.). (1993). Global networks: Computers and international communication. MIT press. 10.7551/mitpress/3304.001.0001
  37. Hörnemalm, A. (2023). ChatGPT as a software development tool: The future of development (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-209909.
  38. Howard, C. D., & Myers, R. D. (2010). Creating video-annotated discussions: An asynchronous alternative. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 116. 10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.853
  39. Huallpa, J. J., Flores Arocutipa, J. P., Panduro, W. D., Huete, L. C., Flores Limo, F. A., Herrera, E. E., Alba Callacna, R. A., Ariza Flores, V. A., Medina Romero, M. Á., Quispe, I. M., & Hernández Hernández, F. A. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105115. 10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
  40. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. 10.30935/cedtech/13605
  41. Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia: A conceptual analysis. Authorea. 10.22541/au.167712329.97543109/v1
  42. Jansson, M., Hrastinski, S., Stenbom, S., & Enoksson, F. (2021). Online question and answer sessions: How students support their own and other students’ processes of inquiry in a text-based learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100817. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100817
  43. Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Nadolny, L. (2023). Willingness to communicate and oral communicative performance through asynchronous video discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 123. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73521
  44. Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670
  45. Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. Educational Technology.
  46. Kleftodimos, A., & Triantafillidou, A. (2023). The use of the Video Platform FlipGrid for Practicing Science Oral Communication. TechTrends, 67, 294314. 10.1007/s11528-022-00801-1
  47. Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. Language Education and Technology, 3(1), 5572. https://bit.ly/43en7e1
  48. Lackmann, S., Léger, P. M., Charland, P., Aubé, C., & Talbot, J. (2021). The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 128. 10.3390/brainsci11020128
  49. Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261270. 10.5334/pme.1072
  50. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4). 10.3390/educsci13040410
  51. Love, S., & Marshall, D. (2022). Video feedback and instructor social presence in an asynchronous online course. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 4358. 10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324
  52. Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383391. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216192/
  53. Lowenthal, P. R. (2022). Exploring student perceptions of asynchronous video in online courses. Distance Education, 43(3), 369387. 10.1080/01587919.2022.2088479
  54. Lowenthal, P. R., Fiock, H. S., Shreaves, D., & Belt, E. (2022). Investigating students’ perceptions of screencasting style of video feedback in online courses. TechTrends, 66, 265275. 10.1007/s11528-021-00665-x
  55. Lowenthal, P. R., & Moore, R. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4), 2841. 10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335
  56. Lowenthal, P. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., Borup, J., & Belt, E. (2021). Faculty perceptions of using synchronous video-based communication technology. Online Learning, 25(4), 4978. 10.24059/olj.v25i4.2890
  57. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 2629. 10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
  58. Maddix, M. A. (2012). Generating and facilitating effective online learning through discussion. Christian Education Journal, 9(2), 372385. 10.1177/073989131200900209
  59. Maimaiti, G., Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. (2023). Student disengagement in web-based videoconferencing supported online learning: an activity theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 48834902. 10.1080/10494820.2021.1984949
  60. Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(October), 100296. 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
  61. McDonald, J. K., West, R. E., Rich, P. J., & Hokanson, B. (2020). Instructional design for learner creativity. In M. J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen, & V. Svihla (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology: learning design (pp. 375399). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_17
  62. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework forteacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 10171054. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  63. Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023) TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and Generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
  64. Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 100050. 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050
  65. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 16. 10.1080/08923648909526659
  66. Moore, N. S., & Filling, M. L. (2012). iFeedback: Using video technology for improving student writing. Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 38, 314.
  67. Moore, R. L. (2016). Interacting at a distance: Creating engagement in online learning environments. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli, & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses (pp. 401425). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-4666-9582-5.ch016
  68. Motoki, F., Neto, V. P., & Rodrigues, V. (2023). More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias. Public Choice, 198(1), 323. 10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2
  69. Nemorin, S., Vlachidis, A., Ayerakwa, H. M., & Andriotis, P. (2023). AI hyped? A horizon scan of discourse on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) and development. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 3851. 10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568
  70. Newstead, T., Eager, B., & Wilson, S. (2023). How AI can perpetuate – Or help mitigate – Gender bias in leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 52(4), 100998. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100998
  71. O’Connell, A. J. (2024, February). How (and why) the University of Michigan built its own closed generative AI tools. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/2/how-and-why-the-university-of-michigan-built-its-own-closed-generative-ai-tools
  72. Omiye, J. A., Lester, J. C., Spichak, S., Rotemberg, V., & Daneshjou, R. (2023). Large language models propagate race-based medicine. Digital Medicine, 6(1), 14. 10.1038/s41746-023-00939-z
  73. Paquette, P. (2016). Instructing the instructors: Training instructors to use social presence cues in online courses. The Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 80108. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1087698; 10.9743/JEO.2016.1.4
  74. Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., Williams, D. S., Estis, J. M., & Lewis, D. (2021). Fostering cognitive presence, social presence and teaching presence with integrated online—team-based learning. TechTrends, 65, 473484. 10.1007/s11528-021-00598-5
  75. Poll, K., Widen, J., & Weller, S. (2014). Six instructional best practices for online engagement and retention. Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1(1), 5672.
  76. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., Santini, F. dr O., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 2534. 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
  77. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in a. The Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 5071. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92000/
  78. Rozado, D. (2023). The political biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3). 10.3390/socsci12030148
  79. Rutner, S. M., & Scott, R. A. (2022). Use of Artificial Intelligence to Grade Student Discussion Boards: An Exploratory Study. Information Systems Education Journal, 20(4), 418. https://isedj.org/;https://iscap.info
  80. Sawyer, K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic books.
  81. Serembus, J. F., & Kemery, D. C. (2020). Creating dynamic learning with zoom. Nurse Educator, 45(6), 291293. 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000915
  82. Singer, J. B., Báez, J. C., & Rios, J. A. (2023). AI creates the message: Integrating AI language learning models into social work education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(2), 294302. 10.1080/10437797.2023.2189878
  83. Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
  84. Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 6173. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003
  85. Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 123. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222408/
  86. Uhlig, R. P., Jawad, S. J., Sinha, B., Dey, P. P., & Amin, M. N. (2023). Student use of artificial intelligence to write technical engineering papers – cheating or a tool to augment learning. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 10.18260/1-2--44330
  87. van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 4358. 10.1177/1094670516679272
  88. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
  89. Wagner, T. (2019). Forward. In K. Sawyer’s The creative classroom: Innovative teaching for 21st-century learners. Teachers College Press.
  90. Wang, Z., Xie, Q., Ding, Z., Feng, Y., & Xia, R. (2023). Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04339
  91. West, R. E., Jay, J., Armstrong, M., & Borup, J. (2017). “Picturing them right in front of me”: Guidelines for implementing video communication in online and blended learning. TechTrends, 61, 461469. 10.1007/s11528-017-0208-y
  92. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490495. 10.2307/258554
  93. Wiley, D. (2023a). AI, instructional design, and OER. Improving learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/7129.
  94. Wiley, D. (2023b). Integrating ChatGPT and other AI tools into instructional design practice. Presentation at the annual convention for the Association of Educational Communications Technology in Orlando, Fl.
  95. Wilson, B. G. (1997). Thoughts on theory in instructional design. Educational Technology, 37(1), 2227.
  96. Xiu, Y., & Thompson, P. (2020). Effects of Video Discussion Posts on Social Presence and Course Satisfaction. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5), 449459. 10.34190/JEL.18.5.007
  97. Yeh, E., Choi, G. Y., & Friesem, Y. (2022). Connecting through Flipgrid: Examining Social presence of English language learners in an online course during the pandemic. CALICO Journal, 39(1). 10.1558/cj.19647
  98. Zhang, R., Bi, N. C., & Mercado, T. (2023). Do zoom meetings really help? A comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous online learning during Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of computer assisted learning, 39(1), 210217. 10.1111/jcal.12740
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 78
Submitted on: Oct 2, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 7, 2025
Published on: Apr 15, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Jered Borup, Richard E. West, Patrick Lowenthal, Leanna Archambault, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.