Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review Cover

Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Abd-Alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M., Latifi, S., Aziz, S., Damseh, R., Alabed Alrazak, S., & Sheikh, J. (2023). Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. JMIR medical education, 9, e48291. 10.2196/48291
  2. Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., … & Farhan, L. (2021). Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. Journal of Big Data, 8, 174. 10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8
  3. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 1932. 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  4. Bannister, P., Peñalver, E. A., & Urbieta, A. S. (2023). Transnational higher education cultures and generative AI: A nominal group study for policy development in English medium instruction. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1/2), 173191. 10.1108/JME-10-2023-0102
  5. Belgodere, B., Dognin, P., Ivankay, A., Melnyk, I., Mroueh, Y., Mojsilovic, A., … & Young, R. A. (2023). Auditing and generating synthetic data with controllable trust trade-offs. arxiv Preprint arXiv:2304.10819. 10.1109/JETCAS.2024.3477976
  6. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Cambridge and Medford: Polity Press.
  7. Bordia, S., & Bowman, S. R. (2019). Identifying and reducing gender bias in word-level language models. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (pp. 715). Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.48550/arXiv.1904.03035
  8. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  9. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 18771901. Retrieved on 12th November 2024 from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html
  10. Caines, A., Benedetto, L., Taslimipoor, S., Davis, C., Gao, Y., Andersen, O., … & Buttery, P. (2023). On the application of Large Language Models for language teaching and assessment technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08393. 10.48550/arXiv.2307.08393
  11. Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., … & Fiedel, N. (2022). Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311. Retrieved on 12th November 2024 from https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v24/22-1144.html
  12. Chung, H. W., Hou, L., Longpre, S., Zoph, B., Tay, Y., Fedus, W., … & Wei, J. (2022). Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416. Retrieved on 12th November 2024 from https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0870.html
  13. Corsello, A., & Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10(4), 757. 10.3390/children10040757
  14. Crawford, K. (2017). The trouble with bias. Keynote at NeurIPS. Retrived from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggzWIipKraM
  15. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
  16. Cui, Y. H., Bai, F., & Zhang, R. X. (2023). ChatGPT zai gao deng jiao yu ling yu de ying yong feng xian ji ying dui [Applications, risks, and countermeasures of ChatGPT in higher education]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science), 5, 1625.
  17. Curtis, N. (2023). To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT? The impact of Artificial Intelligence on academic publishing. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 42(4), 275. 10.1097/INF.0000000000003852
  18. Derner, E., Kučera, D., Oliver, N., & Zahálka, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT read who you are?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16070. 10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100088
  19. Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., … & Gardner, M. (2021). Documenting large webtext corpora: A case study on the colossal clean crawled corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08758. 10.48550/arXiv.2104.08758
  20. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  21. Equality Challenge Unit. (2013). Unconscious bias and higher education. Retrieved from https://diversity.caltech.edu/documents/19785/unconscious-bias-and-higher-education-compressed.pdf
  22. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 115. 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
  23. Fecher, B., Hebing, M., Laufer, M., Pohle, J., & Sofsky, F. (2023). Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of Large Language Models on the science system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09928. 10.48550/arXiv.2306.09928
  24. Fischer, I. (2023). Evaluating the ethics of machines assessing humans. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases. 10.1177/20438869231178844
  25. Garvey, J. C., Mobley, S. D., Summerville, K. S., & Moore, G. T. (2018). Queer and trans* students of color: Navigating identity disclosure and college contexts. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(1), 150178. 10.1080/00221546.2018.1449081
  26. Goyal, A., Siddique, M., Parekh, N., Schwitzky, Z., Broekaert, C., Michelotti, C., … & Kumar, N. (2023). ChatGPT and bard responses to polarizing questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12402. 10.48550/arXiv.2307.12402
  27. Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. 10.3390/educsci13070692
  28. Harrad, R., Keasley, R., & Jefferies, L. (2024). Academic integrity or academic misconduct? Conceptual difficulties in higher education and the potential contribution of student demographic factors. Higher Education Research & Development, 115. 10.1080/07294360.2024.2339833
  29. Heine, S. J., & Ruby, M. B. (2010). Cultural psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(2), 254266. 10.1002/wcs.7
  30. Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., & Ibrahim, Y. (2023). Exploring factors influencing educators’ adoption of ChatGPT: A mixed method approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, (ahead-of-print). 10.1108/ITSE-07-2023-0127
  31. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
  32. Huang, L., Ye, Z., Qin, J., Lin, L., & Liang, X. (2020). GRADE: Automatic graph-enhanced coherence metric for evaluating open-domain dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 92309240). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.742
  33. Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., Hanna, A., Denton, E., Greer, C., Kjartansson, O., … & Mitchell, M. (2021). Towards accountability for machine learning datasets: Practices from software engineering and infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 560575. 10.1145/3442188.3445918
  34. Jo, E. S., & Gebru, T. (2020). Lessons from archives: Strategies for collecting sociocultural data in machine learning. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 306316. 10.1145/3351095.3372829
  35. Kalhor, G., Zeraati, T., & Bahrak, B. (2023). Diversity dilemmas: Uncovering gender and nationality biases in graduate admissions across top North American computer science programs. EPJ Data Sci., 12, 44. 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00422-5
  36. Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., & Bisdas, S. (2023). The advent of generative language models in medical education. JMIR medical education, 9, e48163. 10.2196/48163
  37. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of Large Language Models for education. 10.35542/osf.io/5er8f
  38. Katirai, A., Ide, K., & Kishimoto, A. (2023a). Seisei AI Generative AI No Rinriteki Houteki Shakai-teki Kadai ELSI Ronten No Gaikan 2023-Nen 3-Gatsu Ban [Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) of Generative AI and AI in general: Overview of the discussion points as of March 2023]. ELSI NOTE, 26, 137. 10.18910/90926
  39. Katirai, A., Yamamoto, B. A., Kogetsu, A., & Kato, K. (2023b). Perspectives on artificial intelligence in healthcare from a Patient and Public Involvement Panel in Japan: an exploratory study. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1229308. 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1229308
  40. Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614. 10.3390/su15075614
  41. Latif, E., Mai, G., Nyaaba, M., Wu, X., Liu, N., Lu, G., … & Zhai, X. (2023). Artificial general intelligence (AGI) for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12479. 10.48550/arXiv.2304.12479
  42. Leung, T. I., Sagar, A., Shroff, S., & Henry, T. L. (2023). Can AI mitigate bias in writing letters of recommendation? JMIR Medical Education, 9, e51494. 10.2196/51494
  43. Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02819. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
  44. Li, M., Enkhtur, A., Cheng, F., & Yamamoto, B. A. (2024). Ethical implications of ChatGPT in higher education: A scoping review. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 13(1), 5568. 10.32674/jise.v13i1.6072
  45. Lin, C. C., Akuhata-Huntington, Z., & Hsu, C. W. (2023). Comparing ChatGPT’s ability to rate the degree of stereotypes and the consistency of stereotype attribution with those of medical students in New Zealand in developing a similarity rating test: a methodological study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20(17). 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.17
  46. Łodzikowski, K., Foltz, P. W., & Behrens, J. T. (2023). Generative AI and its educational implications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08659. 10.48550/arXiv.2401.08659
  47. Masters, K. (2023). Ethical use of artificial intelligence in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 158. Medical Teacher, 45(6), 574584. 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2186203
  48. McCowan, T. (2016). Three dimensions of equity of access to higher education, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(4), 645665. 10.1080/03057925.2015.1043237
  49. Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: perceptions of EFL Faculty Members. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 31953217. 10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z
  50. Morley, L., & Lugg, R. (2009). Mapping meritocracy: Intersecting gender, poverty and higher educational opportunity structures. Higher Education Policy, 22, 3760. 10.1057/hep.2008.26
  51. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  52. Najafali, D., Hinson, C., Camacho, J. M., Galbraith, L. G., Tople, T. L., Eble, D., … & Morrison, S. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence knowledge of evidence-based recommendations in gender affirmation surgery and gender identity: is ChatGPT aware of WPATH recommendations?. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 46(6), 11691176. 10.1007/s00238-023-02125-6
  53. Nyaaba, M., Wright, A., & Choi, G. L. (2024). Generative AI and digital neocolonialism in global education: Towards an equitable framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02966.
  54. Ojha, S., Narendra, A., Mohapatra, S., & Misra, I. (2023). From robots to books: An introduction to smart applications of AI in education (AIEd). arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10026. 10.36227/techrxiv.21836610.v1
  55. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Bus Econ, 52, 123125. 10.1057/s11369-017-0027-3
  56. OpenAI Report. (2019). Release strategies and the social impacts of Language Models. Retrieved from https://cdn.openai.com/GPT_2_August_Report.pdf
  57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Country digital education ecosystems and governance: A companion to digital education outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. 10.1787/906134d4-en
  58. Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., … & Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 2773027744. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash/b1efde53be364a73914f58805a001731-Abstract-Conference.html
  59. Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 19). IEEE. 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
  60. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., … & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
  61. Régis, C., Denis, J. L., Axente, M. L., & Kishimoto, A. (2024). Human-centered AI: A multidisciplinary perspective for policy-makers, auditors, and users. Taylor & Francis. 10.1201/9781003320791
  62. Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation (pp. 4779). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_5
  63. Sharma, P., Thapa, K., Dhakal, P., Upadhaya, M. D., Adhikari, S., & Khanal, S. R. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Unlocking the potential of large language models for AI-assisted medical education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00112. 10.48550/arXiv.2307.00112
  64. Sheng, E., Chang, K. W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2021). Societal biases in language generation: Progress and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04054. 10.48550/arXiv.2105.04054
  65. Smith, A., Hachen, S., Schleifer, R., Bhugra, D., Buadze, A., & Liebrenz, M. (2023). Old dog, new tricks? Exploring the potential functionalities of ChatGPT in supporting educational methods in social psychiatry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 69(8), 18821889. 10.1177/00207640231178451
  66. Solaiman, I., Brundage, M., Clark, J., Askell, A., Herbert-Voss, A., Wu, J., … & Wang, J. (2019). Release strategies and the social impacts of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09203. 10.48550/arXiv.1908.09203
  67. Tong, W., Guan, Y., Chen, J., Huang, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in global health equity: An evaluation and discussion on the application of ChatGPT, in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination. Frontiers in Medicine, 10. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1237432
  68. Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M. A., Lacroix, T., … & Lample, G. (2023). Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971. 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971
  69. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., … & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC medical research methodology, 16, 110. 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
  70. Tülübaş, T., Demirkol, M., Ozdemir, T. Y., Polat, H., Karakose, T., & Yirci, R. (2023). An interview with ChatGPT on emergency remote teaching: A comparative analysis based on human-AI collaboration. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(2), 93110. 10.22521/edupij.2023.122.6
  71. UNESCO. (2022). The right to higher education: a social justice perspective. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381750
  72. UNESCO IESALC. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. Retrieved from https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/2023/04/14/chatgpt-and-artificial-intelligence-in-higher-education-quick-start-guide-and-interactive-seminar/
  73. Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in craft education: crafting with text-to-image generative models, Digital Creativity, 34(1), 121. 10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557
  74. Venkit, P. N., Gautam, S., Panchanadikar, R., Huang, T.-H., & Wilson, S. (2023). Nationality bias in text generation. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 116122). Dubrovnik, Croatia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557
  75. Wang, Y., Wang, D., Liang, W., & Liu, C. (2023). ChatGPT jiao yu ying yong de lun li feng xian yu gui bi jin lu [Ethical risks and avoidance approaches of ChatGPT’s educational applications]. Open Education Research, 2, 2635. 10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.9
  76. Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P. S., … & Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359. 10.48550/arXiv.2112.04359
  77. Witte, H., Blatter, T., Nagabhushana, P., Schär, D., Ackermann, J., Cadamuro, J., & Leichtle, A. (2023). Statistical learning and big data applications. Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 47(4), 181186. 10.1515/labmed-2023-0037
  78. Xie, Q., Li, M., & Enkhtur, A. (2024). Exploring generative AI policies in higher education: A comparative perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08986. 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08986
  79. Zhou, P. (2023). Unleasing GPT on the metaverse: Savior or destroyer?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13856. 10.48550/arXiv.2303.13856
  80. Zhu, Y., & Yang, F. (2023). ChatGPT/Chuangshengshi rengong zhineng yu jiaoyu chuangxin: Jiyu, tiaozhan yiji weilai. [ChatGPT/AIGC and Educational Innovation: Opportunities,Challenges, and the Future]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 7, 114. 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.07.001
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 94
Submitted on: Sep 13, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 21, 2024
Published on: Apr 15, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Fei Cheng, Lilan Chen, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.