Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review Cover

Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

Open Access
|Apr 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Societal biases categorization.

#CATEGORIESDESCRIPTION
1gender/sexualityGender reflects societal roles and traits associated with individuals based on their perceived sex, e.g., associating “care” and “emotions” with females and “strong” or “brave” with males. Sexuality involves how individuals experience and express their sexual and romantic identities.
2professione.g., viewing certain profession as “clean”, “well-respected”, “successful” and certain jobs as “dirty”, “unwanted”
3racee.g., associating black or brown race with distrust
4religionvaluing certain religions as superior
5nationalityprejudice or discrimination based on an individual’s country of origin or affiliation
6other societal biasesother societal biases that support certain cultural, ethnic, or other values over other types of cultures
7genericall of these algorithmic biases without specifying which one
Table 2

Final search terms and results by platforms.

DATABASESEARCH TERMSRESULTS
ScopusTITLE-ABS-KEY (“Chatgpt” OR “generative AI” OR “GAI”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“higher education” OR “university” OR “college” OR “education” AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“bias” OR “discrimination”))116
arXivclassification: computer science (cs); include cross list: True; terms: AND abstract = “Chatgpt” OR “generative AI” OR “GAI”; AND abstract = “education” OR “higher education” OR “university administration”; AND abstract = “bias” OR “discrimination”13
CiNiiTITLE-ABS-KEY (“Chatgpt” OR “生成AI”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“教育” OR “高等教育”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“偏見” OR “差別” OR“バイアス”)0
CNKITITLE-ABS-KEY (“Chatgpt” OR “生成 AI”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“教育” OR “高等教育”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“歧视”)13
Figure 1

Data extraction processes.

Table 3

Articles included in the review (authors’ information and the description of main content including focus area and types of biases* mentioned).

AUTHOR(S) DESCRIPTIONCONTENT DESCRIPTION
#AUTHORSREGIONINSTITUTIONLANGUAGECOUNTRY/REGIONEDUCATION LEVELAREAS/DISCIPLINESFOCUS AREA (TEACHING, LEARNING, RESEARCH, ADMINISTRATION)SOCIETAL BIASES*
Scopus
1Abd-Alrazaq et al.,Middle East and Northern AmericaREnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationlearning, teaching7
2Bannister et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarylanguage educationlearning, teaching5, 6
3Corsello et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationlearning, research6
4Dwivedi et al.,Europe and multinationalURHEnglishgenerictertiarygeneralteaching, learning, research, administration1,3,6
5Farrokhnia et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarygeneralteaching, learning6
6Hidayat-ur-Rehman & IbrahimMiddle EastUEnglishMiddle Easttertiarygeneralteaching, learning7
7Karabacak et al.,Northern AmericaRHEnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationresearch3,4,6
8Kasneci et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarygeneralteaching, learning6
9Leung et al.,Northern AmericaUEnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationadministration1
10Lin et al.,Oceania and East AsiaUEnglishOceaniatertiarymedical educationlearning6
11MastersMiddle EastUEnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationteaching, adiministration1,3,4,6
12MohamedMiddle EastUEnglishMiddle Easttertiarymedical educationteaching7
13Najafali et al.,Northern AmericaUEnglishgenericgenericmedical educationteaching,research1
14QadirMiddle EastUEnglishgenerictertiarylanguage educationteaching, learning7
15Rasul et al.,OceaniaUEnglishgenerictertiaryengineering educationteaching, learining,research, administration6
16Smith et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarymedical educationteaching, learning6
17Tong et al.,East Asia and EuropeUEnglishEast Asiagenericmedical educationteaching6
18Tülübaş et al.,EuroasiaUEnglishgenericgenerichigher educationteaching6
19Vartiainen & TedreEuropeUEnglishEuropetertiaryArt educationteaching1,3,5,6
20Witte et al.,EuropeHEnglishgenerictertiaryhigher educationteaching, learning, research1,2,3
ArXiv
21Belgodere et al.,Northern AmericaREnglishNorthern Americatertiaryhigher educationadministration1,3,5
22Caines et al.,EuropeUEnglishgenerictertiarylanguage educationteaching7
23Derner et al.,EuropeUREnlgishgenericgenericpsychology educationresearch1,6
24Fecher et al.,EuropeREnglishgenerictertiarygeneralresearch7
25Goyal et al.,Northern AmericaUEnglishgenerictertiarygeneralteaching, learning, research6
26Liang et al.,Northern AmericaUEnglishgenerictertiarylanguage educationteaching, learning, research6
27ŁodzikowskiNorthern AmericaUEnglishgenericgeneric
general
teaching, learning7
28ZhouEast AsiaUEnglishgenericgenericlanguage educationteaching, learning1, 6
CNKI
29Cui et al.East AsiaUChinesegenerictertiaryhigher educationteaching, learning, research, administration3
30Wang et al.East AsiaUChinesegenericgenerichigher educationteaching, learning, research7
31Zhu & YangEast AsiaUChineseEast Asiagenericgeneralteaching, learning1,2,3,6

[i] *The numbers refer to the categories of bias outlined in Table 1.

Language: English
Page range: 79 - 94
Submitted on: Sep 13, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 21, 2024
Published on: Apr 15, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Fei Cheng, Lilan Chen, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.