Examining the Factors Related to Learners’ Intention and Usage Continuity of Online Learning
By: Abdulvahap Sönmez and Nilgün Özdamar
References
- Aksu, G., Eser, M. T., & Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
- Attard, A. (2010). Student Centered Learning: An Insight Into Theory And Practice. European Students Union. Education and Culture DG. Bucharest: Lifelong Learning Programme
https://www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2010-T4SCL-Stakeholders-Forum-Leuven-An-Insight-Into-Theory-And-Practice.pdf - Ayre, C., & Scally A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. DOI: 10.1177/0748175613513808
- Baraz, A. B., Atik, E., & Atik, E. (2021). Öğrenme Yönetim Sistemi Kullanımının Teknoloji Kabul Modeli Kapsamında İncelenmesi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Örneği. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13 (24), 503–522. DOI: 10.38155/ksbd.886333
- Brains, C., Willnat, L., Manheim, J., & Rich, R. (2011). Empirical Political Analysis (8th edition). Longman.
- Brinkman, W.-P. (2009). Design of a questionnaire instrument. Handbook of mobile technology research methods. pp. 31–57. Nova Publisher.
- Chen, I. Y. (2007). The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communities – a longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451–67. DOI: 10.1177/0165551506075323
- Chen, J. (2022). Applying TAM to the Adoption of E-learning Platform. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2022).
Atlantis Press . DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220704.207 - Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J. H., Kinshuk & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.018
- Cheng, Y. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390. DOI: 10.1108/10662241211235699
- Chin, W. W. (1998).
The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling . In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. - Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Pfeiffer.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. MA Pearson.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. DOI: 10.2307/249008
- Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron Press.
- Farmer, L. S. (2019).
Globalization and Localization in Online Settings . In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, & E. Ntuli (Eds.), Care and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in Online Settings. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7802-4 - Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
- Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(2), 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
- Hair, J. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
- Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS ve Amos 23 Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler. Nobel.
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.
- Koçdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., & Büyük, K. (2017). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Sorularla Zenginleştirilmiş Etkileşimli Video Kullanımı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(2), 93–113. DOI: 10.17494/ogusbd.371441
- Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563–575. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
- Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and Results. Computers & Education, 53(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
- Lee, Ming-C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
- Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Ma, C. Y. (2011). A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 355–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005
- Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
- Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2018). Reconceptualising Learning in the Digital Age The [Un]democratising Potential of MOOCs. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8893-3
- Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A model of business school students’ acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 7–26. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2004.12436815
- Mayers, A. (2013.) Introduction to Statistics and SPSS in Psychology. Pearson.
- Moksony, F. (1999). Small is beautiful. The Use and Interpretation of R2 in Social Research. Szociologiai Szemle, Special İssue, 130–138.
- Nielsen, J. (2010). Ten Usability Heuristics,
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ . Retrieved September 20, 2023. - Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–9. DOI: 10.1177/002224378001700405
- Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
- Özdamar, K. (2017). Ölçek ve Test Geliştirme Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi IBM SPSS, IBM SPSS Amos ve Minitab Uygulamalı. Nisan Kitapevi.
- Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online Learning: Adoption, Continuance, and Learning Outcome—A Review of Literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
- Saade, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42, 317–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
- Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. (2018). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9786-3
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11),
2322 . DOI: 10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189 - Sonmez, H. (2018). Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Sistemindeki öğrencilerin ders çalışma alışkanlıklarının betimsel değerlendirilmesi. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 171–188. Retrieved from
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/36759/419621 - Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A. & Hakim, H. (2020) Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education Inc.
- Tawafak, R., Iqbal Malik, S., Mathew, R., Ashfaque, M., Jabbar, J., Al-Nuaimi, M., Eldow, A., & Alfarsi, G. (2021). A Combined Model for Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning System. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 15(3), 113–129. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v15i03.18953
- Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2011). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Detay Yayıncılık.
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. DOI: 10.2307/3250981
- Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45, 197–210. DOI: 10.1177/0748175612440286
- Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K., & Wang, Z. (2012). Promoting the intention of students to continue their participation in e-learning systems: The role of the communication environment. Information Technology & People, 25(4), 356–375. DOI: 10.1108/09593841211278776
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.570 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 195 - 207
Submitted on: Jun 23, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 20, 2023
Published on: Apr 3, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Abdulvahap Sönmez, Nilgün Özdamar, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.