
Figure 1
The model of hypotheses that affect the intention to use and the continuity of usage behavior of the Anadolum e-Campus platform.
Table 1
Confirmatory factor analysis values.
| COMPATIBILITY INDEX | DESIRABLE COMPATIBILITY VALUE | COMPATIBILITY VALUE |
|---|---|---|
| X2/sd | 2≤CMIN/DF≤ 5 | 4,593 |
| RMSEA | 0≤CMIN/DF≤ 0 .10 | 0,06 |
| IFI | 0.90≤IFI≤1.00 | 0,953 |
| CFI | 0.90≤CFI≤1.00 | 0,953 |
| SRMR | 0≤SRMR≤ 0.10 | 0, 033 |
Table 2
Discriminant validity (Fornell-Lacker).
| AF | AKK | ALS | BK | KDD | KN | MMT | ONY | OYT | OZN | IZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AF | 0.896 | ||||||||||
| AKK | 0.598 | 0.894 | |||||||||
| ALS | 0.413 | 0.364 | 0.914 | ||||||||
| BK | 0.580 | 0.551 | 0.593 | 0.845 | |||||||
| KDD | 0.531 | 0.449 | 0.515 | 0.522 | 0.893 | ||||||
| KN | 0.443 | 0.523 | 0.560 | 0.588 | 0.615 | 0.933 | |||||
| MMT | 0.576 | 0.575 | 0.569 | 0.673 | 0.643 | 0.671 | 0.929 | ||||
| ONY | 0.538 | 0.514 | 0.473 | 0.604 | 0.612 | 0.537 | 0.729 | 0.937 | |||
| OYT | 0.472 | 0.547 | 0.302 | 0.303 | 0.444 | 0.398 | 0.491 | 0.506 | 0.893 | ||
| OZN | 0.370 | 0.264 | 0.528 | 0.478 | 0.406 | 0.468 | 0.421 | 0.409 | 0.189 | 0.930 | |
| IZ | 0.613 | 0.601 | 0.490 | 0.563 | 0.497 | 0.527 | 0.554 | 0.635 | 0.497 | 0.403 | 0.845 |
Table 3
Discriminant validity (HTMT).
| AF | AKK | ALS | BK | KDD | KN | MMT | ONY | OYT | OZN | IZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AF | |||||||||||
| AKK | 0.651 | ||||||||||
| ALS | 0.446 | 0.394 | |||||||||
| BK | 0.630 | 0.589 | 0.665 | ||||||||
| KDD | 0.576 | 0.487 | 0.562 | 0.577 | |||||||
| KN | 0.480 | 0.567 | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.667 | ||||||
| MMT | 0.617 | 0.618 | 0.604 | 0.721 | 0.688 | 0.717 | |||||
| ONY | 0.575 | 0.550 | 0.501 | 0.643 | 0.653 | 0.571 | 0.768 | ||||
| OYT | 0.527 | 0.611 | 0.331 | 0.330 | 0.491 | 0.442 | 0.538 | 0.554 | |||
| OZN | 0.396 | 0.284 | 0.561 | 0.523 | 0.437 | 0.498 | 0.442 | 0.428 | 0.205 | ||
| IZ | 0.681 | 0.670 | 0.545 | 0.635 | 0.552 | 0.585 | 0.607 | 0.696 | 0.566 | 0.444 |
Table 4
Path analysis.
| COEFFICIENT | STANDARD DEVIATION | t | p | f2 | VIF | R2 | Radj2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Benefit (AF) -> Intention to Use (KN) | 0.092 | 0.044 | 2.077 | 0.038 | 0.008 | 1.684 | 0.395 | 0.394 |
| Perceived Ease of Use (AKK)-> Intention to Use (KN) | 0.380 | 0.038 | 9.884 | 0.000 | 0.152 | 1.562 | ||
| Subjective Norm (OZN) -> Intention to Use KN) | 0.334 | 0.025 | 13.423 | 0.000 | 0.158 | 1.162 | ||
| Habit (ALS) -> Continuance Usage Behavior (KDD) | 0.130 | 0.026 | 4.963 | 0.000 | 0.022 | 1.628 | 0.526 | 0.524 |
| Intention to Use (KN) -> Continuance Usage Behavior (KDD) | 0.259 | 0.036 | 7.167 | 0.000 | 0.070 | 2.016 | ||
| Satisfaction (MMT) -> Continuance Usage Behavior (KDD) | 0.178 | 0.053 | 3.398 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 2.989 | ||
| Approval (ONY) -> Continuance Usage Behavior (KDD) | 0.232 | 0.044 | 5.280 | 0.000 | 0.049 | 2.302 | ||
| Self-Efficacy (OYT) -> Continuance Usage Behavior (KDD) | 0.097 | 0.034 | 2.831 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 1.415 | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use (AKK) -> Perceived Benefit (AF) | 0.274 | 0.035 | 7.855 | 0.000 | 0.086 | 1.748 | 0.499 | 0.498 |
| Cognitive Absorption (BK)-> Perceived Benefit (AF) | 0.258 | 0.033 | 7.728 | 0.000 | 0.081 | 1.633 | ||
| Content Richness (IZ)-> Perceived Benefit (AF) | 0.303 | 0.036 | 8.523 | 0.000 | 0.103 | 1.781 | ||
| Cognitive Absorption (BK) -> Perceived Ease of Use (AKK) | 0.551 | 0.021 | 26.159 | 0.000 | 0.436 | 1.000 | 0.304 | 0.303 |
