Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“It’s Like a Whole Set of Things That We Do”: A Qualitative Study of the Roles of Journal Editors-in-Chief Cover

“It’s Like a Whole Set of Things That We Do”: A Qualitative Study of the Roles of Journal Editors-in-Chief

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Kwiek M. The prestige economy: journals, citations and academic publication. Higher Education. 2021;82(2):331–354. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-021-00683-1
  2. Dean KL, Forray JM. Reopening the black box of editorship: Who reviews journal editors? Journal of Management Education. 2019;43(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1177/1052562918815205
  3. Vale RD. Accelerating scientific publication in biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(44):13439–13446. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511912112
  4. Nguyen VM, Haddaway NR, Gutowsky LF, et al. How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0132557. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557
  5. Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1): 633–650. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
  6. Maggio LA, Costello JA, Brown KR, Artino AR, Jr., Durning SJ, Ma TL. Time to Publication in Medical Education Journals: An Analysis of Publication Timelines During COVID-19 (2019–2022). Perspect Med Educ. 2024;13(1):507–517. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1287
  7. Phillips KA, Horn DM. Review and Publication Times and Reporting Across Journals on Health Policy. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(5):e2512545. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12545
  8. Lone YR, Shah UU, Bhat SA, Mushtaq R, Gul S. How publication timelines effect the impact metrics: studying the influence of submission to first decision and submission to acceptance on impact factor and 5-year impact factor of journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2025;74(1–2):287–296. DOI: 10.1108/GKMC-08-2022-0201
  9. Manan MR, Nawaz I, Rahman S, Manan H. Diversity, equity, and inclusion in medical education journals: An evaluation of editorial board composition. Med Teach. 2024;46(2):280–288. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249212
  10. Sarna KV, Griffin T, Tarlov E, Gerber BS, Gabay MP, Suda KJ. Trends in gender composition on editorial boards in leading medicine, nursing, and pharmacy journals. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(4):565–570. DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.12.018
  11. Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar DP, Maggio LA. Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors’ Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):464–470. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001860
  12. Fox CW, Paine CET. Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(6):3599–3619. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4993
  13. Acker S, Rekola M, Wisker G. Editing a higher education journal: Gatekeeping or development? Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2022;59(1):104–114. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2021.2004909
  14. Moher D, Galipeau J, Alam S, et al. Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):167. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0
  15. Starfield S, Paltridge B. Journal editors: gatekeepers or custodians? In Peeler E, Badenhorst C, Guerin C, editors. Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, Mentors, Gatekeepers. Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 253–270. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_14
  16. AMEE. Applications open: Editor-in-Chief Medical Teacher. AMEE website. Published May 6, 2024. Accessed April 9, 2026. https://amee.org/news/articles/editor-in-chief-medical-teacher/
  17. Mustaine EE, Tewksbury R. Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2013;24(3):386–401. DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2012.759244
  18. Mustaine EE, Tewksbury R. A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors for Behind-the-Scenes Data on the Publication Process. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 2016;47(3):231–249. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/613574
  19. Glonti K, Boutron I, Moher D, Hren D. Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e033421. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421
  20. Cheung JJH, Balmer DF, Bierer SB, Cianciolo AT. “Making Space for More People, More Perspectives, and More Ideas”: How Medical Education Journal Editors View Their Role in Capacity Building. Acad Med. 2024;99(11):1306–1312. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005826
  21. Prager EM, Chambers CD, Ghosh SS, et al. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing. J Neurosci Res. 2019;97(4):377–390. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24340
  22. Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, Ayanian JZ, et al. Equity and the JAMA Network. JAMA. 2021;326(7):618–620. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.9377
  23. Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  24. Wong K, O’Brien BC, Kiger M, Humphrey-Murto S. Reflexive thematic analysis. Acad Med. Published online April 3, 2026. DOI: 10.1093/acamed/wvag011
  25. Maggio LA, Ninkov A, Frank JR, Costello JA, Artino AR, Jr. Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es). Med Educ. 2022;56(4):387–394. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14677
  26. LaDonna KA, Artino AR, Jr., Balmer DF. Beyond the guise of saturation: rigor and qualitative interview data. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(5):607–611. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1
  27. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315617444
  28. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  29. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  30. Sparks SC. From gatekeepers to facilitators: Understanding the role of the journal editor. College English. 2014 Nov 1;77(2):153–157. DOI: 10.58680/ce201426147
  31. Crain M, Poster WR, Cherry MA. eds. Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World. University of California Press; 2016.
  32. Ellaway RH. Where have all the reviewers gone? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024;29(3):717–720. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10350-2
  33. Belém de Oliveira Neto J. The challenge of reviewers’ scarcity in academic journals: payment as a viable solution. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024;22:eED1194. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024ED1194
  34. Springer Nature. Editor courses. Accessed April 9, 2026. https://www.springernature.com/gp/editors/editor-courses
  35. Council of Science Editors. Short courses. Accessed April 9, 2026. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/short-courses
  36. Wyatt TR, Bullock JL, Andon A, et al. Editors as Gatekeepers: One Medical Education Journal’s Efforts to Resist Racism in Scholarly Publishing. Acad Med. 2023;98(12):1406–1412. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005303
  37. Church HR, Govender L. The Inside Scoop: What We Learnt About Getting into Academic Publishing During Our Editorial Internship. Med Sci Educ. 2023;34(2):439–444. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01961-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.3277 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 1085 - 1094
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2026
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2026
Published on: Oct 15, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Lauren A. Maggio, Anthony R. Artino Jr., Joseph A. Costello, Paolo C. Martin, TingLan Ma, Kirsten R. Brown, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.