Open Science in Undergraduate Medical Education: An International Framework for Transparency, Responsibility, and Professional Identity Formation
References
- Moher D, Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Nasser M, Bossuyt PMM, Korevaar DA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who’s listening? Lancet. 2016;387:1573–1586. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00307-4
- Cobey KD, Ebrahimzadeh S, Page MJ, Thibault RT, Nguyen PY, Abu-Dalfa F, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLoS Biol. 2024;22. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870
- Bicchieri C, Fatas E, Aldama A, Casas A, Deshpande I, Lauro M, et al. In science we (should) trust: expectations and compliance across nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021;16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252892
- Romanello M, Walawender M, Hsu SC, Moskeland A, Palmeiro-Silva Y, Scamman D, et al. The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: facing record-breaking threats from delayed action. Lancet. 2024;404:1847–1896. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01822-1
- Thoma B, Abbott C, Snell L. The future of the CanMEDS physician competency framework. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14:
1 . DOI: 10.36834/CMEJ.77098 - Ahmadi SF, Baradaran HR, Ahmadi E. Effectiveness of teaching evidence-based medicine to undergraduate medical students: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2015;37:21–30. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.971724
- Moreira F, Teixeira P, Leão C. Effectiveness of medical ethics education: a systematic review. MedEdPublish. 2021;10:
175 . DOI: 10.15694/MEP.2021.000175.1 - Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348:1422–1425. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab2374
- Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:
160018 . DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 - Ernstmeyer KE, Christman EI. Adopting open educational resources as an equity strategy. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2023;44:
306 . DOI: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001170 - International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations. IFMSA policy document on Open Science. 2023 [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://ifmsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/IFMSA-Policy-Document-on-Open-Science.pdf - Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC, Masuzzo P, Collister LB, Hartgerink CHJ. The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: an evidence-based review. F1000Research. 2016;5:
632 . DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 - Asukile MT, Zunt JR, Thakur KT. Building equitable neuroscience research collaborations in resource-limited settings. Semin Neurol. 2024;44:159–167. DOI: 10.1055/S-0043-1778640
- Farrow R. Open science and epistemic equity: opportunities and challenges in the contemporary research ecosystem. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:
504 . DOI: 10.1186/S13104-025-07608-2 - UNESCO. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. DOI: 10.54677/MNMH8546
- Hothersall EJ. Modernizing undergraduate medical education by bringing public health into focus. Front Public Health. 2024;12:
1451155 . DOI: 10.3389/FPUBH.2024.1451155 - Di Salvo I, Mwoka M, Kwaga T, Rukundo PA, Ernest DS, Osaheni LA, et al. Open access, open education resources and open data in Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.129.6325
- Altenberger S, Leischik R, Vollenberg R, Ehlers JP, Strauss M. A comparative analysis of the doctoral regulations at the medical faculties in Germany. Int J Med Sci. 2024;21:
732 . DOI: 10.7150/ijms.92167 - Houtkoop BL, Chambers C, Macleod M, Bishop DVM, Nichols TE, Wagenmakers EJ. Data sharing in psychology: a survey on barriers and preconditions. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018;1:70–85. DOI: 10.1177/2515245917751886
- O’Dea RE, Parker TH, Chee YE, Culina A, Drobniak SM, Duncan DH, et al. Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biol. 2021;19. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3
- Casimo K. Teaching and training with open science: from classroom teaching tool to professional development. Neuroscience. 2023;525:6–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.07.013
- Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:2–8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- Crüwell S, Van Doorn J, Etz A, Makel MC, Moshontz H, Niebaum JC, et al. Seven easy steps to open science: an annotated reading list. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 2019;227:237–248. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000387
- Sebok-Syer SS, Smirnova A, Duwell E, George BC, Triola MM, Feddock CA, et al. Sharing is caring: helping institutions and health organizations leverage data for educational improvement. Perspect Med Educ. 2024;13:486–495. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1081
- Toelch U, Ostwald D. Digital open science: teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLoS Biol. 2018;16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006022
- Gibson JP, Mourad T. The growing importance of data literacy in life science education. Am J Bot. 2018;105:1953–1956. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1195
- Drevenšek M, Tajnšek I. Open Science and Open Education: bringing social and technical disciplines into dialogue. Cambridge: SSH Centre; 2023 [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://sshcentre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/03-Literature-Briefs_Open-Science.pdf - Hassall C, Lewis DI. Institutional and technological barriers to the use of open educational resources (OERs) in physiology and medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41:77–81. DOI: 10.1152/ADVAN.00171.2016
- De Knecht S, Van der Meer M, Brinkman L, Kluijtmans M, Miedema F. Reshaping the academic self: connecting education and Open Science. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 2021. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5345573
- Bansal A. Expanding free open-access medical education. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:
794667 . DOI: 10.3389/FMED.2021.794667 - Sielemann K, Hafner A, Pucker B. The reuse of public datasets in the life sciences: potential risks and rewards. PeerJ. 2020;8:
e9954 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9954 - Thayer EK, Rathkey D, Miller MF, Palmer R, Mejicano GC, Pusic M, et al. Applying the institutional review board data repository approach to manage ethical considerations in evaluating and studying medical education. Med Educ Online. 2016;21. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v21.32021
- Iskander R, Kane P, Sharp M, Kimmelman J. Weighing open science against research participation burden in informed consent: a randomized pilot study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025;20:311–322. DOI: 10.1177/15562646251384573
- Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89:1446–1451. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427
- Sarraf-Yazdi S, Teo YN, How AEH, Teo YH, Goh S, Kow CS, et al. A scoping review of professional identity formation in undergraduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36:3511–3521. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07024-9
- Désilets V, Graillon A, Ouellet K, Xhignesse M, St-Onge C. Reflecting on professional identity in undergraduate medical education: implementation of a novel longitudinal course. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11:232–236. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-021-00649-W
- Hafferty FW, Castellani B. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med. 2010;85:288–301. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c85b43
- Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Percie du Sert N, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:
0021 . DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 - Stubbing E, Helmich E, Cleland J. Authoring the identity of learner before doctor in the figured world of medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:40–46. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-017-0399-0
- Al-Eyd G, Achike F, Agarwal M, Atamna H, Atapattu DN, Castro L, et al. Curriculum mapping as a tool to facilitate curriculum development: a new school of medicine experience. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18. DOI: 10.1186/S12909-018-1289-9
- Al Jundi A, Sakka S. Protocol writing in clinical research. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:
ZE10 . DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21426.8865 - Evans TR, Branney P, Clements A, Hatton E. Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: barriers and recommendations. Account Res. 2023;30:88–108. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1969233
- Lvovs D, Creason AL, Levine SS, Noble M, Mahurkar A, White O, et al. Balancing ethical data sharing and open science for reproducible research in biomedical data science. Cell Rep Med. 2025;6:
102080 . DOI: 10.1016/J.XCRM.2025.102080 - Diaz-Martinez LA, Fisher GR, Esparza D, Bhatt JM, D’Arcy CE, Apodaca J, et al. Recommendations for effective integration of ethics and responsible conduct of research education into course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;18:
mr2 . DOI: 10.1187/CBE.18-10-0203 - Tabatabaei ZS, Amini H, Khabaz Mafinejad M. Tools for assessing professional identity in health professions education: a scoping review. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2024;17. DOI: 10.18502/JMEHM.V17I13.18665
- Lewis A, Jamieson J, Smith CA. Professional identity formation in allied health: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Teach Learn Med. 2025;37:24–40. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2290608
- Rountrey C, Ford A, Brice C, Warner L, Lee SY, Koshoffer A, et al. Introducing open science in higher education settings: a case example from a college of allied health sciences. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/17489539.2025.2588200
- Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403–407. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013
- Bennett D, Solomon Y, Bergin C, Horgan M, Dornan T. Possibility and agency in figured worlds: becoming a “good doctor.” Med Educ. 2017;51:248–257. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13220
- Utrecht University. Strategic Plan 2025: open mind, open attitude, open science—improving the world sustainably together. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 2020 [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/UtrechtUniversity-StrategicPlan2025.pdf - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Open Science Center. Munich: LMU Munich; [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://fdm.ub.lmu.de/services-networks/open-science-center/ - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Open Science Initiative in Medicine. Munich: LMU Munich; [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://www.osc.lmu.de/partners/local-os-initiatives/osim.html - Berlin University Alliance. The Mission Statement for Open Science at the Berlin University Alliance. Berlin: Berlin University Alliance; 2023 [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://www.berlin-university-alliance.de/en/commitments/research-quality/open-science/Leitbild-fuer-OS/index.html - Office of Science and Technology Policy. Ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. Washington (DC): Executive Office of the President; 2022 Aug 25 [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from:
https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf - Packer AL. The SciELO open access: a gold way from the South. Can J High Educ. 2009;39(3):111–126. DOI: 10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.479
- Okafor IA, Mbagwu SI, Chia T, Hasim Z, Udokanma EE, Chandran K. Institutionalizing open science in Africa: limitations and prospects. Front Res Metr Anal. 2022;7:
855198 . DOI: 10.3389/FRMA.2022.855198 - Ipsos. Global trustworthiness index 2024: a 32-country Ipsos Global Advisor survey. Ipsos; 2024.
- Forsey J, Ng S, Rowland P, Freeman R, Li C, Woods NN. The basic science of patient–physician communication: a critical scoping review. Acad Med. 2021;96:S109–S118. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004323
- Rosman T, Bosnjak M, Silber H, Koßmann J, Heycke T. Open science and public trust in science: results from two studies. Public Underst Sci. 2022;31:1046–1062. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221100686
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2600 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 1017 - 1027
Submitted on: Mar 22, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2026
Published on: Sep 30, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2026 Haang Jeung-Maarse, Rosa L. Ecos, Luisa F. Jimenez-Soto, Philipp Linde, Mara Müssigmann, Sandra Schuh, Sarah Wahlster, Changryul Claud Yi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.