Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment Fit for (More Than One) Purpose? Reconciling the Dual Purposes of Assessments in Competency-Based Health Professions Education Cover

Assessment Fit for (More Than One) Purpose? Reconciling the Dual Purposes of Assessments in Competency-Based Health Professions Education

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Caretta-Weyer HA, Smirnova A, Barone MA, et al. The Next Era of Assessment: Building a Trustworthy Assessment System. Perspect Med Educ. 2024;13(1):12–23. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1110
  2. Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478–485. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
  3. Schellekens LH, Bok HGJ, de Jong LH, van der Schaaf MF, Kremer WDJ, van der Vleuten CPM. A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Stud Educ Eval. 2021;71:101094. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
  4. Carless D. Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2007;44(1):57–66. DOI: 10.1080/14703290601081332
  5. Dann R. Assessment as learning: blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 2014;21(2):149–166. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
  6. Sharif AF, Kasemy ZA, Aloshari SH. Assessment as Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study on Pre-Clinical Medical Student-Led Generation of Scenario-Based Multiple Choice Questions. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025;16:1847–1859. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S549385
  7. Ginsburg S, Stroud L, Brydges R, Melvin L, Hatala R. Dual purposes by design: exploring alignment between residents’ and academic advisors’ documents in a longitudinal program. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024;29(5):1631–1647. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10318-2
  8. Schut S, Maggio LA, Heeneman S, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Driessen E. Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(1):6–13. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00625-W
  9. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13645
  10. Kinnear B, Warm EJ, Caretta-Weyer H, et al. Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment. Acad Med. 2021;96(7S):S56. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108
  11. Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–616. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082
  12. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, et al. Clarifying students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):282–291. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12054
  13. Crommelinck M, Anseel F. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: a literature review. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):232–241. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12075
  14. Schut S, Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Heeneman S. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners’ perceptions within programmatic assessment. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):654–663. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13532
  15. Schuwirth L, Ash J. Assessing tomorrow’s learners: In competency-based education only a radically different holistic method of assessment will work. Six things we could forget. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):555–559. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.787140
  16. Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in Health Professions Education. Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. Accessed October 11, 2024. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uva/detail.action?docID=425408
  17. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, et al. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:123. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-123
  18. Heeneman S, Oudkerk Pool A, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice. Med Educ. 2015;49(5):487–498. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12645
  19. Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):73. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0912-5
  20. Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37(9):830–837. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
  21. Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol Rev. 1988;95(2):256–273. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  22. Dweck CS, Yeager DS. Mindsets: A View From Two Eras. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14(3):481–496. DOI: 10.1177/1745691618804166
  23. Nichol H, Turnnidge J, Dalgarno N, Trier J. Navigating the paradox: Exploring resident experiences of vulnerability. Med Educ. 2024;58(12):1469–1477. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15426
  24. Kennedy TJT, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard L. Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees’ requests for clinical support. BMJ. 2009;338:b128. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b128
  25. Hattie J, Timperley H. The Power of Feedback. 2007. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://journals-sagepub-com.proxy1.library.virginia.edu/doi/full/10.3102/003465430298487
  26. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205–214. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
  27. Hauer K, Goldhamer M, Amiel J, et al. The educational alliance: essential to implement competency-based health professions education. Perspect Med Educ., 2026;15(1):799–813. DOI: 10.5334/pme.2607
  28. Fuentes-Cimma J, Sluijsmans D, Riquelme A, et al. Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):440. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05439-6
  29. Govaerts M. Workplace-Based Assessment and Assessment for Learning: Threats to Validity. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):265–267. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00101.1
  30. Castanelli DJ, Weller JM, Molloy E, Bearman M. How Trainees Come to Trust Supervisors in Workplace-Based Assessment: A Grounded Theory Study. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2022;97(5):704–710. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004501
  31. Trier J, Turnnidge J, McGuire CS, Côté J, Dagnone JD. It’s a “two-way street”: resident perspectives of effective coaching relationships in the clinical learning environment. Can Med Educ J. 2022;13(3):5–12. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.72940
  32. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):855–871. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701775453
  33. Eva KW, Bordage G, Campbell C, et al. Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(4):897–913. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6
  34. Van Melle E, Frank JR, Holmboe ES, et al. A Core Components Framework for Evaluating Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education Programs. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2019;94(7):1002–1009. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002743
  35. van der Vleuten C, Lindemann I, Schmidt L. Programmatic assessment: the process, rationale and evidence for modern evaluation approaches in medical education. Med J Aust. 2018;209(9):386–388. DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00926
  36. Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478–485. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
  37. Timmerman AA, Dijkstra J. A practical approach to programmatic assessment design. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(5):1169–1182. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3
  38. Govaerts M, Van der Vleuten C, Schut S. Implementation of Programmatic Assessment: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Educ Sci. 2022;12(10):717. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12100717
  39. Wilkinson TJ, Tweed MJ. Deconstructing programmatic assessment. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:191–197. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S144449
  40. Harrison CJ, Molyneux AJ, Blackwell S, Wass VJ. How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):323–326. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.932901
  41. Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Dannefer EF, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5(5):276–284. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-016-0297-X
  42. Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Molyneux A, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? Med Educ. 2013;47(7):734–744. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12209
  43. Torre D, Rice NE, Ryan A, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment –2. Implementation and practice. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1149–1160. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1956681
  44. Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308
  45. Marty AP, Linsenmeyer M, George B, Young JQ, Breckwoldt J, Ten Cate O. Mobile technologies to support workplace-based assessment for entrustment decisions: Guidelines for programs and educators: AMEE Guide No. 154. Med Teach. Published online January 27, 2023:1–11. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2168527
  46. Ryan MS, Gielissen KA, Shin D, et al. How well do workplace-based assessments support summative entrustment decisions? A multi-institutional generalisability study. Med Educ. 2024;58(7):825–837. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15291
  47. Halman S, Rekman J, Wood T, Baird A, Gofton W, Dudek N. Avoid reinventing the wheel: implementation of the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool (OCAT) in Internal Medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):218. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1327-7
  48. Krumm AE, Marcotte K, George BC. Model-Based Operative Performance Expectations for Quantifying Competency in General Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(5):515–521. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0014
  49. Lomis K, Pusic MV, Warm EJ, et al. Leveraging AI to accelerate competency-based education in the health professions. Perspect Med Educ, under review.
  50. Ganni S, Botden SMBI, Chmarra M, Li M, Goossens RHM, Jakimowicz JJ. Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Med Syst. 2020;44(3):56. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9
  51. Perrone KH, Yang S, Mohamadipanah H, et al. Translating motion tracking data into resident feedback: An opportunity for streamlined video coaching. Am J Surg. 2020;219(4):552–556. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.032
  52. Goldenberg MG, Jung J, Grantcharov TP. Using Data to Enhance Performance and Improve Quality and Safety in Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(10):972–973. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888
  53. Kinnear B, Caretta-Weyer H, Lam ACL, et al. Finding Medicine’s Moneyball: How Lessons From Major League Baseball Can Advance Assessment in Precision Education. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2024;99(4S Suppl 1):S35–S41. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005600
  54. Lomis K. The medical educator’s guide to projects leveraging artificial intelligence and learning analytics. American Medical Association. March 2025. Accessed January 9, 2026. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/ai-educator-guide.pdf
  55. Ten Cate TJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961–973. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435
  56. Raymond BL, Fowler LC, Robertson AC. The Impact of Converting From an “Educator-Driven” to a “Learner-Initiated” Feedback Model. J Educ Perioper Med JEPM. 2019;21(3):E627. DOI: 10.46374/volxxi-issue3-raymond
  57. Ramani S, Könings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):625–631. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1432850
  58. Ahn E, Caverzagie K, Damodaran A, et al. No Environment, No Education: Honoring the Clinical Learning Environment as the Engine of Competency-based Education – A Call To Action. Perspect Med Educ. 2026;15(1):771–782. DOI: 10.5334/pme.2548
  59. Busari JO, Chan MK, Schwartz A, et al. CBE and the missing ‘E’: Making competency-based education an equitable framework for a majority-world health professions education. Perspect Med Educ., 2026; 15(1):880–893. DOI: 10.5334/pme.2551
  60. Branfield Day L, Miles A, Ginsburg S, Melvin L. Resident Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback in Competency-Based Medical Education: A Focus Group Study of One Internal Medicine Residency Program. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2020;95(11):1712–1717. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003315
  61. Brand PLP, Jaarsma ADC, van der Vleuten CPM. Driving lesson or driving test?: A metaphor to help faculty separate feedback from assessment. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(1):50–56. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00617-W
  62. Baartman L, Baukema H, Prins F. Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 2023;48(5):598–612. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2022.2100875
  63. Hall J, Oswald A, Hauer KE, Hall AK, Englander R, Cheung WJ. Twelve tips for learners to succeed in a CBME program. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):745–750. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925233
  64. Parsons AS, Kon RH, Plews-Ogan M, Gusic ME. You can have both: Coaching to promote clinical competency and professional identity formation. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(1):57–63. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00612-1
  65. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2015;90(5):609–614. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
  66. Sargeant J, Mann K, Manos S, et al. R2C2 in Action: Testing an Evidence-Based Model to Facilitate Feedback and Coaching in Residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):165–170. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00398.1
  67. Sargeant J, Lockyer JM, Mann K, et al. The R2C2 Model in Residency Education: How Does It Foster Coaching and Promote Feedback Use? Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2018;93(7):1055–1063. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002131
  68. Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, et al. Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2). Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2015;90(12):1698–1706. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
  69. Hamza DM, Hauer KE, Oswald A, et al. Making sense of competency-based medical education (CBME) literary conversations: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 78. Med Teach. 2023;45(8):802–815. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2168525
  70. Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–616. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082
  71. Walsh K. Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. OUP Oxford; 2013. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199652679.001.0001
  72. Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, et al. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1102–1109. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2592 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 946 - 958
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2026
Published on: Sep 29, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Michael S. Ryan, Aleda M. H. Chen, Heather Nichol, Sören Huwendiek, Denyse Richardson, Benjamin Kinnear, Warren J. Cheung, Claire Touchie, Fremen Chihchen Chou, David A. Turner, Anna Oswald, As members of the International Competency-Based Health Professions Education Collaborative, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.