Beyond Online Course Evaluations: Student-Led Focus Groups for Curricular Feedback
References
- Liaison Committee on Medical Education.
Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree . Chicago, IL: Liaison Committee on Medical Education; 2013 [accessed 2024 Nov 21]. Available from:https://lcme.org/standards-and-rules/ - Huxham M, Laybourn P, Cairncross S, et al. Collecting student feedback: A comparison of questionnaire and other methods. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2008;33(6):675–686. DOI: 10.1080/02602930701773000
- Kogan JR, Shea JA. Course evaluation in medical education. Teach Educ. 2007;23(3):251–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.020
- Brandl K, Mandel J, Winegarden B. Student evaluation team focus groups increase students’ satisfaction with the overall course evaluation process. Med Educ. 2017;51(2):215–227. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13104
- Uijtdehaage S, O’Neal C. A curious case of the phantom professor: mindless teaching evaluations by medical students. Med Educ. 2015;49(9):928–932. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12647
- Rauf A, Baig L, Jaffery T, Shafi R. Exploring the trustworthiness and reliability of focus groups for obtaining useful feedback for evaluation of academic programs. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014;27(1):28–33. DOI: 10.4103/1357-6283.134303
- Brandl K, Rabadia SV, Chang A, Mandel J. Benefit of focus group discussion beyond online survey in course evaluations by medical students in the United States: A qualitative study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:
25 . DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.25 - Wilson MW, Morreale MK, Waineo E, Balon R. The focus group: a method for curricular review. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37(4):281–282. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.12010004
- Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
- Chioncel NE, Van Der Veen RG, Wildemeersch D, Jarvis P. The validity and reliability of focus groups as a research method in adult education. Intern J Lifelong Educ. 2003;22(5):495–517. DOI: 10.1080/0260137032000102850
- Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
- Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016;50(9):933–942. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13063
- Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:
114523 . DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 - Charmaz K.
Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods . In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. pp. 509–535. - Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. DOI: 10.1177/160940690600500107
- Stalmeijer RE, McNaughton N, Van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–939. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165
- Hobson WL, Avant-Mier R, Cochella S, Van Hala S, Stanford J, Alder SC, Croskell SE. Caring for the underserved: using patient and physician focus groups to inform curriculum development. Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(2):90–95. DOI: 10.1367/A04-076R.1
- Liu I, Rabin B, Manivannan M, Laney E, Philipsborn R. Evaluating strengths and opportunities for a co-created climate change curriculum: Medical student perspectives. Front Public Health. 2022;10:
1021125 . DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1021125
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1786 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 748 - 758
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2026
Published on: Sep 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2026 David Rekhtman, Jessica Campanile, Alex F. Nisbet, Abigail Kohler, Jennifer Hong, Ish Sethi, Suzanne Rose, C. Jessica Dine, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.