Table 1
Themes identified following exit-interviews with students and faculty.
| CODE | # OF STUDENT REFERENCES | # OF FACULTY REFERENCES | PERCENT TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | 1 | 12 | 2.42 |
| Co-creation | 1 | 11 | 2.23 |
| Shared Responsibility | 0 | 1 | 0.19 |
| Engagement | 29 | 21 | 9.29 |
| Authentic interest | 9 | 1 | 1.86 |
| Honesty | 4 | 1 | 0.93 |
| Sample Size | 16 | 19 | 6.51 |
| Environment | 115 | 6 | 22.49 |
| Safety | 115 | 6 | 22.49 |
| Anonymous | 3 | 2 | 0.93 |
| Peers | 24 | 2 | 4.83 |
| Facilitators | 31 | 0 | 5.76 |
| Food | 27 | 0 | 5.02 |
| Intimate Setting | 13 | 1 | 2.60 |
| No faculty | 16 | 1 | 3.16 |
| Practices | 148 | 116 | 49.07 |
| Alignment with expectations and needs | 140 | 108 | 46.10 |
| Longitudinal feedback | 3 | 14 | 3.16 |
| Quality of feedback | 18 | 44 | 11.52 |
| Representative feedback | 61 | 41 | 18.96 |
| Focus Groups | 48 | 22 | 13.01 |
| OASIS | 12 | 18 | 5.58 |
| Thoughtful engagement with feedback | 58 | 3 | 11.34 |
| Student engagement with OASIS | 28 | 1 | 5.39 |
| Significant time or work burden | 17 | 1 | 3.35 |
| Student participation in OASIS | 13 | 1 | 2.60 |
| Student engagement in focus groups | 17 | 1 | 3.35 |
| Content delivery | 8 | 8 | 2.97 |
| Relationship | 80 | 10 | 16.73 |
| Commitment | 3 | 5 | 1.49 |
| Respect | 6 | 1 | 1.30 |
| Trust | 71 | 4 | 13.94 |
| Closed-loop communication | 21 | 0 | 3.90 |
| Course Representatives | 16 | 2 | 3.35 |
| Faculty | 30 | 1 | 5.76 |
Figure 1
Student Experience. Tree map in which the size of the box corresponds to the proportional frequency of a specific code among transcripts obtained from interviews with students. This data is also presented in tabulated form in Table 1.
Figure 2
Faculty Experience. Tree map in which the size of the box corresponds to the proportional frequency of a specific code among transcripts obtained from interviews with course directors and administrators. This data is also presented in tabulated form in Table 1.