Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Medical Students’ General Beliefs and Specific Perceptions about Patient Feedback Before and after Training in a Clinical Context Cover

Medical Students’ General Beliefs and Specific Perceptions about Patient Feedback Before and after Training in a Clinical Context

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

pme-13-1-1261-g1.png
Figure 1

Study context and data collection.

The study context was a 12-week clerkship consisting of 4 weeks gynecology, 4 weeks pediatrics and 4 off-ward weeks. The feedback training consisted of (1) a preparatory feedback assignment, (2) feedback conversations with patients and (3) a facilitated reflection session. Group A participated in the facilitated reflection session in week 5, group B participated in week 12. The questionnaires students completed during their clerkship are displayed in blue.

BPFQ = beliefs about patient feedback questionnaire, FPQ = feedback perception questionnaire.

Table 1

Beliefs about patient feedback questionnaire.

1.Involving patients in my learning process through the use of patient-feedback is meaningful
2.Patient-feedback within ‘this’ clerkship is useful
3.Feedback should only be provided by clinical supervisors
4.In general, I am confident that the feedback I receive from patients is of good quality
5.In general, I am confident that the feedback I receive from patients helps me to improve my performance
6.Being capable of dealing with critical patient-feedback is an important skill
7.Being capable of improving one’s work based on received patient-feedback is an important skill

[i] This questionnaire was developed by building on the Beliefs about peer-feedback questionnaire [17].

Table 2

Feedback perception questionnaire (in context of patient feedback).

SCALEITEM
PERCEIVED ADEQUACY OF FEEDBACK
1.I am satisfied with this feedback
2.I consider this feedback fair
3.I consider this feedback justified
4.I consider this feedback useful
5.I consider this feedback helpful
6.This feedback provides me a lot of support
7.I accept this feedback
8.I dispute this feedback
9.I reject this feedback
Willingness to improve
10.Based on this feedback, I am willing to improve my performance
11.I am willing to invest a lot of effort in improving the skills I received feedback on
12.I am willing to, during my clerkships, work on further developing the skills I received feedback on

[i] This questionnaire was developed by building on the Feedback Perception Questionnaire for peer-feedback. [31] All items answered on a bi-polar scale from 0 (fully disagree) to 10 (fully agree).

pme-13-1-1261-g2.png
Figure 2

Flowchart of study participants and participant responses.

BPFQ = beliefs about patient feedback questionnaire; FPQ = feedback perception questionnaire.

Table 3

Change in general beliefs and message perceptions of patient feedback after training.

nPRE MEAN (SD)POST MEAN (SD)Δ MEAN (SD)dfpd
Beliefs about patient feedback questionnaire
BPF794.22(.45)3.95(.53)–0.27 (.43)78<0.01.63
Feedback message perceptions questionnaire
FPPAF697.97 (1.66)7.32 (2.00)0.65 (1.63)68<0.01.40
FPWI697.32 (2.42)7.12 (2.34)0.20 (1.78)680.35

[i] Δ = difference; n = number of students, SD = standard deviation, d = Cohen’s d, BPF = Beliefs about patient feedback, FPPAF = Perceived adequacy of feedback, FPWI = Willingness to improve.

Table 4

Correlations between Perceived feedback adequacy and Willingness to improve.

CORRELATION COEFFICIENTp
Δ FPPAF – Δ FPWI.47*<0.001
pre FPPAF – pre FPWI.50*<0.01
post FPPAF – post FPWI.78*<0.01

[i] Δ = difference, FPPAF = Perceived adequacy of feedback, FPWI = Willingness to improve.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1261 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 14, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 4, 2024
Published on: May 8, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 M. Charlotte L. Eijkelboom, Renske A. M. de Kleijn, Joost Frenkel, Marieke F. van der Schaaf, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.