Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps Cover

From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. A Cutting-Edge House in the Heartland (2007, July 1). Journal of Light Construction. https://www.jlconline.com/how-to/in-the-news-13_o
  2. Agapiou, A. (2022). Barriers to offsite construction adoption: A quantitative study among housing associations in England. Buildings, 12(3), 283. 10.3390/buildings12030283
  3. Ahlqvist, T., Valovirta, V., & Loikkanen, T. (2012). Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 178–190. 10.1093/scipol/scs016
  4. Alhawamdeh, M., & Lee, A. (2025). A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the barriers of offsite construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(9), 1087–1099. 10.1080/15623599.2024.2397287
  5. Buntrock, D. (2017). Prefabricated housing in Japan. In R. E. Smith & J. D. Quale (Eds.), Offsite architecture. First edition. (pp. 190–213). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315743332-12
  6. Carroll, B. W. (1989). Post-war trends in Canadian housing policy. Urban History Review/Revue d’histoire Urbaine, 18(1), 64–74.
  7. CCCS – Built with IBS, Inspired by Sarawak Cultures (2018). Heights, 4. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Web-use_Heights_Vol-4_final_compressed.pdf
  8. CDBB (n.d.). The approach to develop the foundation data model for the Information Management Framework. The Centre for Digital Built Britain (CDBB), University of Cambridge, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/files/250221_the_choice_of_start_point_for_the_foundation_data_model_for_the_information_management_framework_1.pdf
  9. CDBB (2020, May). The pathway towards an Information Management Framework—A ‘commons’ for Digital Built Britain. Centre for Digital Built Britain. https://digitaltwinhub.co.uk/download/the-pathway-towards-an-information-management-framework/
  10. CIDB (2010). Roadmap for Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Malaysia 2011–2015. Construction Industry Development Board, Ministry of Works, Malaysia. https://architecturemalaysia.com/Files/Pool/267_240815_145504554_ibs_roadmap_v5.pdf
  11. CIDB (2012). Transforming the construction industry, 2012 annual report. Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/annualReport2012_compressed.pdf
  12. CIDB (2013). Enhancing productivity – managing sustainability, 2013 annual report. Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/annual_report_2013_compressed.pdf
  13. CIDB (2015). 20 years leading construction industry transformation, 2015 annual report. Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CIDB-Annual-Report-2015_compressed.pdf
  14. CIDB (2016). Protesting the hike. Heights, 3. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Heights3-compressed.pdf
  15. CIDB (2017). Spearheading construction transformation, 2017 annual report. Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CIDB-Annual-Report-2017-final_compressed.pdf
  16. CIDB (2021). Industry revival, post pandemic, 2021 annual report. Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CIDB-Laporan-Tahunan-2021_compressed.pdf
  17. CIH (2024, March 21). The product platform rulebook. Construction Innovation Hub. https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/media/rp2i3lfb/the-product-platform-rulebook_edition-1.pdf
  18. Code for Construction Product Information (2021, February 4). https://www.cpicode.org.uk/
  19. Dawkins, C. J., Koebel, C. T., Cavell, M., Hullibarger, S., Hattis, D. B., & Weissman, H. (2011). Regulatory barriers to manufactured housing placement in urban communities. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/Publications/pdf/mfghsg_HUD_2011.pdf
  20. DOE (n.d.). Home upgrades. US Department of Energy. Energy.Gov. https://www.energy.gov/save/home-upgrades
  21. DOE (2010). Energy-efficient manufactured homes. United States Department of Energy. Energy.Gov. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/energy-efficient-manufactured-homes
  22. DOE (2013). Moisture and ventilation solutions in hot, humid climates: Florida manufactured housing (PNNL-SA-90557; Building Technologies Program). United States Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/articles/moisture-and-ventilation-solutions-hot-humid-climates-florida-manufactured
  23. DOE (2014). Southern energy homes: First DOE zero energy ready manufactured home Russellville, AL (PNNL-SA-105453). United States Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/09/f18/DOE_ZEH_SouthernHomesDivision_09-20-14_0.pdf
  24. Energy Efficient Mortgages (n.d.). Energy Star. https://www.energystar.gov/newhomes/energy-efficient-mortgages
  25. EPA (2006, April). Energy Star qualified manufactured homes. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://e1.nmcdn.io/assets/advancedenergy/wp-content/uploads/imported-files/Energy20Star20Manufactured20Home20Brochure-English.pdf
  26. Featherston, C., & O’Sullivan, E. (2014). A review of international public sector strategies and roadmaps: A case study in advanced materials. Centre for Science Technology and Innovation, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.
  27. FEMA (2009). Protecting manufactured homes from floods and other hazards: A multi-hazard foundation and installation guide. Second edition. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), United States Department of Homeland Security. https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo59646
  28. Friedman, A. (1995). The evolution of design characteristics during the post-Second World War housing boom: The US experience. Journal of Design History, 8(2), 131–146.
  29. Garcia, M. L., & Bray, O. H. (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping (SAND--97-0665, 471364; p. SAND--97-0665, 471364). 10.2172/471364
  30. Geum, Y., & Park, Y. (2012). The state-of-the-art of public-sector technology roadmaps: A taxonomical approach to energy technology roadmaps. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 327–339.
  31. Godin, K., Stapleton, J., Kirkpatrick, S. I., Hanning, R. M., & Leatherdale, S. T. (2015). Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Systematic Reviews, 4, 138. 10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0.
  32. Green, S. D. (2022). Modern methods of construction: Reflections on the current research agenda. Buildings & Cities, 3(1). 10.5334/bc.265
  33. Hart, D. (2019). Roadmapping. In P. E. V. de Miranda (Ed.), Science and engineering of hydrogen-based energy technologies (pp. 357–382). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814251-6.00007-1
  34. HUD (2009). Performance and accountability report, fiscal year 2009. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://archives.hud.gov/reports/par/2009par.pdf
  35. IPA (2020, June 16). National infrastructure and construction procurement pipeline 2020/21. Infrastructure and Projects Authority and HM Treasury. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-infrastructure-and-construction-procurement-pipeline-202021
  36. IPA (2021a, March 24). Government launches new Projects Academy. Infrastructure and Projects Authority and Cabinet Office. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-launches-new-projects-academy
  37. IPA (2021b, September 13). Transforming Infrastructure Performance (TIP): Roadmap to 2030. Infrastructure and Projects Authority. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/transforming-infrastructure-performance-roadmap-to-2030
  38. IPA (2021c, December 22). Project routemap – Setting up projects for success. Infrastructure and Projects Authority. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6297200fe90e0703a2fed794/Handbook__-_FINAL.pdf
  39. IPA (2022, December 14). IPA benchmarking data service. Infrastructure and Projects Authority. GOV.UK. https://ipa-benchmarking-data.service.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/
  40. IPA (2024a, February 2). National infrastructure and construction pipeline 2023. Infrastructure and Projects Authority and HM Treasury. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-infrastructure-and-construction-pipeline-2023
  41. IPA (2024b, March 18). Mind the gap! Lessons learned from Crossrail as a project delivery advisor. Infrastructure and Projects Authority. GOV.UK. https://ipa.blog.gov.uk/2024/03/18/mind-the-gap-lessons-learned-from-crossrail-as-a-project-delivery-advisor/
  42. Jeffrey, H., Sedgwick, J., & Robinson, C. (2013). Technology roadmaps: An evaluation of their success in the renewable energy sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(5), 1015–1027. 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.016
  43. Kendall, J. (2021). National digital twin—Integration architecture pattern and principles. The Centre for Digital Built Britain, University of Cambridge, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 10.17863/CAM.68207
  44. Kerr, C. & Phaal, R. (2020). Technology roadmapping: Industrial roots, forgotten history and unknown origins. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119967. 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119967
  45. Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2013). Roadmapping as a responsive mode to government policy: A goal-orientated approach to realising a vision. In M. G. Moehrle, R. Isenmann, & R. Phaal (Eds.), Technology Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation (pp. 67–87). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3_5
  46. Kerr, N., Gouldson, A., & Barrett, J. (2017). The rationale for energy efficiency policy: Assessing the recognition of the multiple benefits of energy efficiency retrofit policy. Energy Policy, 106, 212–221. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.053
  47. Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, C. (2011). An empirical analysis of the determinants of technology roadmap utilization. R&D Management, 41(5), 485–508. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00657.x
  48. Levy, E., Dentz, J., Ansanelli, E., Barker, G., Rath, P., & Dadia, D. (2016). Field evaluation of advances in energy-efficiency practices for manufactured homes (NREL/SR-5500-65436). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/building_america/65436.pdf
  49. Manufactured Housing Research Alliance (2003, July). Technology roadmapping for manufactured housing. Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing, US Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/MANUFHSG/tech_roadmap.html
  50. Manufactured Housing Research Alliance (2005). Manufactured homes: Saving money by saving energy. Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/saveenergy_savemoney.pdf
  51. Manufactured Housing Research Alliance (2006, January). Factory Built Housing Roadmap (including recommendations for energy research). Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing, US Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/destech/roadmapping.html
  52. Manufactured Housing Research Alliance (2007). Pilot study—Applying lean to factory home building. Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. https://www.huduser.gov/portal//Publications/pdf/pilotstudy.pdf
  53. Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 5(2), 145–174.
  54. MCIEA Catalyses Malaysia’s Construction Industry: Best of the Best (2015). Heights, 2. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Heights2-compressed.pdf
  55. McIlvaine, J., Chandra, S., Barkaszi, S., Beal, D., Chasar, D., Colon, C., Fonorow, K., Gordon, A., Hoak, D., Hutchinson, S., Lubliner, M., Martin, E., McCluney, R., McGinley, M., McSorley, M., Moyer, N., Mullens, M., Parker, D., Sherwin, J., & Wichers, S. (2006). Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership (BAIHP) final project report: September 1, 1999–June 30, 2006 (No. 921627). University of Central Florida, Florida Solar Energy Center. 10.2172/921627
  56. Meissner, D., Carayannis, E., & Sokolov, A. (2016). Key features of roadmapping for company and policy strategy making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 106–108. 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.020
  57. Miedzinski, M., McDowall, W., Fahnestock, J. Rataj, O., & Papachristos, G. (2022). Paving the pathways towards sustainable future? A critical assessment of STI policy roadmaps as policy instruments for sustainability transitions. Futures, 142, 103015. 10.1016/j.futures.2022.103015
  58. National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (2025). NISTA annual report 2024–2025. UK Government. https://ar25.nista.grid.civilservice.gov.uk/report
  59. Natural England (2023, February 2). Natural England unveils new Green Infrastructure Framework. UK Government. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/natural-england-unveils-new-green-infrastructure-framework
  60. NIMA (2023, December 18). GIIG – history. https://wearenima.im/giig-history/
  61. NIMA. (2025, May 30). New IMI framework to extend UK BIM framework. https://wearenima.im/new-imi-framework/
  62. Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Edward Elgar.
  63. Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M.-H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. First edition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108555081
  64. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2006). Handbook of public policy. SAGE Publications.
  65. Rahman, M. M. (2014). Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(1), 69–77. 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000173
  66. Siebelink, R., Halman, J. I. M., & Hofman, E. (2016). Scenario-driven roadmapping to cope with uncertainty: Its application in the construction industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 226–238. 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.030
  67. Skyline Corporation (2009, January 9). Skyline Corporation manufactured home installation manual. https://factoryexpohomes.com/assets/Skyline-Installation-Manual-1-15-09.pdf
  68. Steinhardt, D. A., & Manley, K. (2016). Adoption of prefabricated housing–the role of country context. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 126–135. 10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.008
  69. Temkin, K., Hong, G., Davis, L., Hudson, E., & Cantrell, R. (2007). Factory-built construction and the American homebuyer: Perceptions and opportunities. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/Publications/pdf/Perceptions_of_factory_construction.pdf
  70. The Comptroller General of the United States (1976). Operation Breakthrough: Lessons learned about demonstrating new technology (PSAD-76-173). U.S. Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/psad-76-173.pdf
  71. UK Geospatial Commission (2022). Measuring the economic, social and environmental value of public sector location data. UK Government Digital Service, Cabinet Office, and Geospatial Commission.
  72. UK Government Cabinet Office (2022, September). The Construction Playbook: Government guidance on sourcing and contracting public works projects and programmes. UK Government Cabinet Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6312222de90e075880923330/14.116_CO_Construction_Playbook_Web.pdf
  73. UK Government Digital Service, Geospatial Commission and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (2022, March 22). National Underground Asset Register (NUAR). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-underground-asset-register-nuar
  74. United States Department of Energy (n.d.). Office of State and Community Energy Programs. Energy.Gov. Retrieved January 21, 2026, from https://www.energy.gov/scep/office-state-and-community-energy-programs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.790 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 932 - 951
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2026
Published on: Aug 14, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Gabrielle Goldman, David Sorokine, Frank Suerich-Gulick, Carlo Carbone, Michael Jemtrud, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.