Critical Junctures, Reform Sustainability, and Judicial Performance in Portugal: A Longitudinal Study of Civil Enforcement Actions
References
- Ambach, Philipp, and Rackwitz, Klaus U. “A Model of International Judicial Administration? The Evolution of Managerial Practices at the International Criminal Court”. Law and Contemporary Problems 76, no. 3–4 (2013): 119–161.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24244675 . - Basílio, João. “Noções Básicas de Ação Executiva.” Conferência do Conselho Regional de Lisboa da Ordem dos Advogados (2020).
https://crlisboa.org/wp/publicacao/nocoes-basicas-de-acao-executiva/ . - Burke, Kevin, and Steve, Leben. “Procedural Fairness: A Key Ingredient in Public Satisfaction”. Court Review 44, nos. 1–2 (2007): 4–25.
https://irlaw.umkc.edu/faculty_works/269 . - Capoccia, Giovanni.
“Critical Junctures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam. Oxford University Press, 2016, 89–106. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.5 - Capoccia, Giovanni.
“Critical Junctures and Institutional Change.” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. Cambridge University Press, 2015, 145–179. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316273104.007 - Capoccia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, Daniel R. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 341–369. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887100020852
- CEPEJ. European Judicial Systems: CEPEJ Evaluation Report. 2024.
https://rm.coe.int/cepej-evaluation-report-part-1-en-/1680b272ac . - Cohen, Edward S. “Hector Fix-Fierro, Courts, Justice & Efficiency: A Socio-Legal Study of Economic Rationality in Adjudication. Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing, 2003, 268 Pages.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 19, no. 2 (2004): 173–176. DOI: 10.1017/S082932010000819X
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro. “Sobre o SIADAP, a Teoria Institucional e o Ministério da Justiça em Portugal”. Scientia Iuridica 60, no. 325 (2011): 101–130.
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, Ireneu Oliveira Mendes, Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira, and Inês Subtil. “The Combat Against COVID-19 in Portugal: How State Measures and Data Availability Reinforce Some Organizational Values and Contribute to the Sustainability of the National Health System”. Sustainability 12, no. 18 (2020a): 7513. DOI: 10.3390/su12187513
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, Ireneu Oliveira Mendes, Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira, and Inês Subtil. “The Combat Against COVID-19 in Portugal Part II: How State Measures and Data Availability Reinforce Some Organizational Values and Contribute to the Sustainability of the National Health System”. Sustainability 12, no. 20 (2020b): 8715. DOI: 10.3390/su12208715
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, Mariana Teles Viegas Cruz Dias, Débora Lopes Gonçalves, Zinga Daniela Joaquim Novais, and Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira. “Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part III: MoU Results Based on an Empirical Study of Special Revitalization Procedure Performance.” Paper presented at EnAJUS (Econtro de Administração da Justiça), 2018.
https://enajus.org.br/2018/assets/sessoes/005_EnAjus.pdf . - Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, and Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira. “O Impacto da Pandemia COVID-19 no Desempenho das Ações Executivas Cíveis: O que nos Dizem os Dados até ao Momento?”. Solicitadoria e Ação Executiva 8 (2022): 216–34.
https://issuu.com/camara_dos_solicitadores/docs/coletanea8/8?ff . - Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, and Susana Antas Videira. “Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment; An Empirical Study on the Success Story of the Civil Enforcement Actions”. International Journal for Court Administration 7, no. 1 (2015): 37–49. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.180
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, and Susana Antas Videira. “Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued Positive Results for Civil Enforcement Actions in Troika’s Aftermath”. International Journal for Court Administration 8, no. 1 (2016): 20–31. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.215
- Correia, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro, Susana Antas Videira, and Ireneu Oliveira Mendes. “Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results”. Pensamiento Americano 12, no. 24 (2019): 40–53. DOI: 10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309
- Creutzfeldt, Naomi, and Richard Kirkham. “Understanding How and When Change Occurs in the Administrative Justice System: The Ombudsman/ Tribunal Partnership as a Catalyst for Reform?” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 42, no. 2 (2020): 253–273. DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2020.1751931
- DGPJ. Estatísticas da Justiça – Alguns Indicadores Estatísticos Sobre os Processos nos Tribunais Judiciais de 1a Instância, 2007–2015. Ministério da Justiça, 2016.
- Eom, Seok-Jin, and Jooho Lee. “Editorial. Digital Government Transformation in Turbulent Times: Responses, Challenges, and Future Direction”. Government Information Quarterly 39, no. 2 (2022), 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690
- Fabri, Marco, and Philip M. Langbroek. The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems: Developing a Public Administration Perspective. IOS Press, 2000.
- Fix-Fierro, Hector. Courts, Justice, and Efficiency: A Socio-Legal Study of Economic Rationality in Adjudication. Hart Publishing, 2003.
- Frederickson, H. George, Kevin B. Smith, Christopher W. Larimer, and Michael J. Licari. The Public Administration Theory Primer. 2nd ed. Westview Press, 2012.
- Garoupa, Nuno. O governo da justiça. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2011.
https://ffms.pt/pt-pt/livraria/o-governo-da-justica . - Gomes, Conceição. “The Transformation of the Portuguese Judicial Organization: Between Efficiency and Democracy”. Utrecht Law Review 3, no. 1 (2007): 101–111. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.39
- Gouveia, Mariana França, Nuno Garoupa, and Pedro Magalhães. O Sistema Judiciário: Justiça Económica em Portugal. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2012.
- Greenberg, Michael D., and Geoffrey McGovern. An Early Assessment of the Civil Justice System After the Financial Crisis: Something Wicked This Way Comes? RAND Corporation, 2012.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt3fh0gv . - Guimarães, Tomas de Aquino, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, Luiz Akutsu, and João Abreu de Faria Bilhim. “Governança em Tribunais de Justiça de Portugal: Adaptação e Validação de Escala de Medida”. Ciências e Políticas Públicas 1, no. 1 (2015): 25–46. DOI: 10.33167/2184-0644.CPP2015.VIN1/pp.25-46
- Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”. Political Studies 44, no. 5 (1996): 936–957. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
- Hathaway, Oona A. “Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System.” Law, Economics, and Public Policy Working Papers, Paper 270, 2003. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.384595
- Kickert, Walter J. M., and Frans-Bauke van der Meer. “Small, Slow, and Gradual Reform: What Can Historical Institutionalism Teach Us?” International Journal of Public Administration 34, no. 8 (2011): 475–485. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2011.583768
- Lane, Jan-Erik. New Public Management: An Introduction. Routledge, 2000.
- Langer, Máximo. “Revolution in Latin American Criminal Procedure: Diffusion of Legal Ideas from the Periphery”. The American Journal of Comparative Law 55, no. 4 (2007): 617–676. DOI: 10.1093/ajcl/55.4.617
- Martelotte, Marcela Cohen, Reinaldo Castro Souza, and Eduardo Antônio Barros da Silva. “Design of Seasonal Adjustment Filter Robust to Variations in the Seasonal Behaviour of Time Series.” Journal of Official Statistics 33, no. 1 (2017): 155–186. DOI: 10.1515/jos-2017-0009
- McAuslan, Patrick. “Path dependency, law and development.” Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education 1, no. 1 (2001): 51–68. DOI: 10.1080/14760400108522887
- Nascimento, Dahan da Cunha, Cristiane Rocha Silva, and Jonato Prestes. “Procedimentos Post Hoc: Orientação para Praticantes de Estatística em Ciências da Saúde.” Arquivos de Ciência do Esporte 6, no. 2 (2018): 45–49. DOI: 10.17648/aces.v6n2.2783
- Ng, Gar Yein, Marco Velicogna, and Cristina Dallara. “Monitoring and Evaluation of Courts Activities and Performance.” International Journal for Court Administration 1, no. 1 (2008): 58–64. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.129
- Patrick, Jeremy. “Path dependency, the High Court, and the Constitution.” Journal of Judicial Administration 30, no. 2 (2020): 51–63.
https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20210128042854 . - Pedroso, João, and Cristina Cruz.
“A Acção Executiva: Caracterização, Bloqueios e Propostas de Reforma.” Observatório Permanente da Justiça Portuguesa. Centro de Estudos Sociais, 2001.https://crlisboa.org/docs/publicacoes/on-line/acao-executiva-caracterizacao-bloqueios-propostas-reforma.pdf . - Pekkanen, Petra, Maija Eronen, Pauliina Seppälä, and Timo Pirttilä. “Designing and Implementing Delay Reduction Projects in Courts.” International Journal for Court Administration 4, no. 3 (2012): 94–103. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.89
- Pereira, Sandra Patrícia Marques, and Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia. “Sustainability of Portuguese Courts: Citizen Satisfaction and Loyalty as Key Factors.” Sustainability 12, no. 23 (2020): 10163. DOI: 10.3390/su122310163
- Pereira, Sandra Patrícia Marques, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, and João Abreu de Faria Bilhim. “Research of Innovation and Digital Transformation in Justice: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 2, no. 1 (2024): 221–250. DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2024.12
- Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (2000): 251–267. DOI: 10.2307/2586011
- Portugal. Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. 2011.
https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/mou/2011-05-18-mou-portugal_en.pdf . - Reiling, Abeline Dorothea.
“Technology for Justice: How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2009.https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/42181632/completepercent20dissertation.pdf . - Resende, Sérgio André Lopes, and Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia. “Resistance to Change in the Public Sector: A Modern Concept?” European Journal of Applied Business and Management 10, no. 3 (2024): 1–17. DOI: 10.58869/EJABM10(3)/01
- Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. “Os Tribunais e as Novas Tecnologias de Comunicação e de Informação”. Sociologias 7, no. 13 (2005): 82–109. DOI: 10.1590/s1517-45222005000100004
- Shah, Attaullah, Hamid Ali Shah, Jason Smith, and Giuseppe Labianca. “Judicial Efficiency and Capital Structure: An International Study.” Journal of Corporate Finance 44 (2017): 255–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.012
- Smith, B. “Models of Judicial Administration and the Independence of the Judiciary: A Comparison of Romanian Self-Management and the Czech Executive Model.” Public Administration and Development 28, no. 2 (2008): 85–93. DOI: 10.1002/pad.483
- Torfing, Jacob. “Rethinking Path Dependence in Public Policy Research.” Critical Policy Studies 3, no. 1 (2009): 70–83. DOI: 10.1080/19460170903158149
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.693 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Published on: Jun 12, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, Susana Antas Videira, Sandra Marques Pereira, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.