Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Chemotaxis responses of the different strains to various components of the Daqing crude oil and their respective relativedegradation rates_
| Attractants1 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6-1B | Rhodococcus erythropolis T7-2 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotaxis response2 | Oil degrading rate (%)3 | Chemotaxis response2 | Oil degrading rate (%)3 | Chemotaxis response2 | Oil degrading rate (%)3 | |
| Dodecane | + | 63.22 | – | 78.17 | – | ND |
| Tridecane | + | 56.18 | – | 75.62 | – | ND |
| Tetradecane | + | 54.28 | – | 67.57 | – | ND |
| Pentadecane | + | 57.97 | – | 62.84 | – | ND |
| Hexadecane | + | 55.54 | – | 59.73 | – | ND |
| Liquid paraffin | + | 58.13 | – | 65.11 | – | ND |
| Crude oil | + | 60.09 | – | 75.43 | – | ND |
| Naphthalene | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND |
| Diphenyl | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND |
| Sulfur | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND |
The characteristics of the strains used in this study_
| Strain characteristics | Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6-1B | Rhodococcus erythropolisT7-2 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimum temperature (°C) | 42 | 30 | 37 |
| Fermentation product2 | Rhamnolipid | Saccharides, protein, lipid | ND |
| Emulsification index (EI24) | 100% | 100% | ND |
| Cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH%)1 | 38% | 85% | 16% |
| Degradation range of n-alkenes | C8-C20 | C12-C36 | ND |
| Degradation rate of crude oil3 | 60.09% | 75.43% | ND |