Anti-Salmonella Potential of New Lactobacillus Strains with the Application in the Poultry Industry

KOWALSKA, JUSTYNA D.; NOWAK, ADRIANA; ŚLIŻEWSKA, KATARZYNA; STAŃCZYK, MAŁGORZATA; ŁUKASIAK, MAGDALENA; DASTYCH, JAROSŁAW

doi:10.33073/pjm-2020-001

Abstract

Probiotics are considered an alternative to antibiotics in the prevention and treatment of Salmonella diseases in poultry. However, to use probiotics as proposed above, it is necessary to evaluate their properties in detail and to select the most effective bacterial strains in the application targeted. In this study, probiotic properties of new Lactobacillus sp. strains were investigated and their antimicrobial activity against 125 environmental strains of Salmonella sp. was determined using the agar slab method. Furthermore, their survival in the presence of bile salts and at low pH, antibiotics susceptibility, aggregation and coaggregation ability, adherence to polystyrene and Caco-2 cells, and cytotoxicity were investigated. Each strain tested showed antagonistic activity against at least 96% of the environmental Salmonella sp. strains and thus representing a highly epidemiologically differentiated collection of poultry isolates. In addition, the probiotic properties of new Lactobacillus strains are promising. Therefore, all strains examined showed a high potential for use in poultry against salmonellosis.

References

Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk T, Koryszewska-Bagińska A, Grynberg M, Nowak A, Cukrowska B, Kozakova H, Bardowski J. Genomic and functional characterization of the unusual pLOCK 0919 plasmid harboring the spaCBA pili cluster in Lactobacillus casei LOCK 0919. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8(1):202–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv247
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Angelakis E. 2017. Weight gain by gut microbiota manipulation in productive animals. Microb Pathog. 106:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Belicová A, Mikulášová M, Dušinský R. Probiotic potential and safety properties of Lactobacillus plantarum from Slovak Bryndza cheese. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/760298
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bonardi S, Alpigiani I, Bruini I, Barilli E, Brindani F, Morganti M, Cavallini P, Bolzoni L, Pongolini S. Detection of Salmonella enterica in pigs at slaughter and comparison with human isolates in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;218:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.11.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borie C, Sánchez ML, Navarro C, Ramírez S, Morales MA, Retamales J, Robeson J. Aerosol spray treatment with bacteriophages and competitive exclusion reduces Salmonella enteritidis infection in chickens. Avian Dis. 2009 Jun;53(2):250–254. https://doi.org/10.1637/8406-071008-Reg.1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borowiec M, Gorzkiewicz M, Grzesik J, Walczak-Drzewiecka A, Salkowska A, Rodakowska E, Steczkiewicz K, Rychlewski L, Dastych J, Ginalski K. Towards engineering novel PE-based immunotoxins by targeting them to the nucleus. Toxins (Basel). 2016 Nov 10;8(11):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110321
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B. Salmonella nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jul;38(7):2465–2467.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carter A, Adams M, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ. Colonisation of poultry by Salmonella Enteritidis S1400 is reduced by combined administration of Lactobacillus salivarius 59 and Enterococcus faecium PXN-33. Vet Microbiol. 2017;199:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.029
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chapman CMC, Gibson GR, Rowland I. Health benefits of probiotics: are mixtures more effective than single strains? Eur J Nutr. 2011 Feb;50(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-010-0166-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chousalkar K, Gole VC. Salmonellosis acquired from poultry. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;29(5):514–519. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000296
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cukrowska B, Motyl I, Kozáková H, Schwarzer M, Górecki RK, Klewicka E, Śliżewska K, Libudzisz Z. Probiotic Lactobacillus strains: in vitro and in vivo studies. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009 Nov;54(6):533–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-009-0077-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010 Sep 01;74(3):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00016-10
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duary RK, Batish VK, Grover S. Relative gene expression of bile salt hydrolase and surface proteins in two putative indigenous Lactobacillus plantarum strains under in vitro gut conditions. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Mar;39(3):2541–2552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1006-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018;16(12). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fiorentin L, Vieira ND, Barioni W Jr. Oral treatment with bacteriophages reduces the concentration of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 in caecal contents of broilers. Avian Pathol. 2005 Jun;34(3):258–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340500112157
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaggìa F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 141(SUPPL.):S15–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gao P, Ma C, Sun Z, Wang L, Huang S, Su X, Xu J, Zhang H. Feed-additive probiotics accelerate yet antibiotics delay intestinal microbiota maturation in broiler chicken. Microbiome. 2017 Dec; 5(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0315-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Handley PS, Harty DWS, Wyatt JE, Brown CR, Doran JP, Gibbs ACC. A comparison of the adhesion, coaggregation and cell-surface hydrophobicity properties of fibrillar and fimbriate strains of Streptococcus salivarius. J Gen Microbiol. 1987 Nov;133(11): 3207–3217. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-133-11-3207
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Higgins SE, Higgins JP, Wolfenden AD, Henderson SN, Torres-Rodriguez A, Tellez G, Hargis B. Evaluation of a Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture for the reduction of Salmonella enteritidis in neonatal broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2008 Jan 01;87(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00210
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hütt P, Shchepetova J, Lõivukene K, Kullisaar T, Mikelsaar M. Antagonistic activity of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens. J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Jun;100(6): 1324–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02857.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imperial ICVJ, Ibana JA. Addressing the antibiotic resistance problem with probiotics: reducing the risk of its double-edged sword effect. Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 15;07:1983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01983
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Janković T, Frece J, Abram M, Gobin I. Aggregation ability of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Int J Sanit Eng Res. 2012;6(1):19–24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jankowska A, Laubitz D, Antushevich H, Zabielski R, Grzesiuk E. Competition of Lactobacillus paracasei with Salmonella enterica for adhesion to Caco-2 cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2008(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/357964
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaushik JK, Kumar A, Duary RK, Mohanty AK, Grover S, Batish VK. Functional and probiotic attributes of an indigenous isolate of Lactobacillus plantarum. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 1;4(12): e8099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008099
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim KH, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kwon IK, Chae BJ. Bacteriophage and probiotics both enhance the performance of growing pigs but bacteriophage are more effective. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2014;196:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, Caipo M, Crump JA, Devleesschauwer B, Döpfer D, Fazil A, Fischer-Walker CL, Hald T, et al. World Health Organization Estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015;12(12):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001920
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klewicka E, Libudzisz Z. Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria towards selected food-contaminating bacteria. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2004;13/54(2):169–174.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kos B, Šušković J, Vuković S, Šimpraga M, Frece J, Matošić S. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J Appl Microbiol. 2003 Jun;94(6):981–987. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01915.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koziel JA, Frana TS, Ahn H, Glanville TD, Nguyen LT, van Leeuwen JH. Efficacy of NH3 as a secondary barrier treatment for inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in digestate of animal carcasses: proof-of-concept. PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0176825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176825
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kristoffersen SM, Ravnum S, Tourasse NJ, Økstad OA, Kolstø AB, Davies W. Low concentrations of bile salts induce stress responses and reduce motility in Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 [corrected]. J Bacteriol. 2007 Jul 15;189(14):5302–5313. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00239-07
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
La Ragione R, Woodward MJ. Competitive exclusion by Bacillus subtilis spores of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Clostridium perfringens in young chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2003 Jul 17;94(3):245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00077-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mokoena MP. Lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins: Classification, biosynthesis and applications against uropathogens: A mini-review. Molecules. 2017 Jul 26;22(8):1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081255
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moubareck C, Gavini F, Vaugien L, Butel MJ, Doucet-Populaire F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Jan 01;55(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh495
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Musikasang H, Tani A, H-kittikun A, Maneerat S. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chicken gastrointestinal digestive tract. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Aug; 25(8):1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0020-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nowak A, Motyl I. In vitro anti-adherence effect of probiotic Lactobacillus strains on human enteropathogens. Biotechnol Food Sci. 2017;81(2):103–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ostad SN, Salarian AA, Ghahramani MH, Fazeli MR, Samadi N, Jamalifar H. Live and heat-inactivated lactobacilli from feces inhibit Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli adherence to Caco-2 cells. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009 Mar;54(2):157–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-009-0024-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patterson J, Burkholder K. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult Sci. 2003 Apr 01;82(4):627–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prado-Rebolledo OF, Delgado-Machuca JJ, Macedo-Barragan RJ, Garcia-Márquez LJ, Morales-Barrera JE, Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Tellez G. Evaluation of a selected lactic acid bacteria-based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization and intestinal permeability in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2017 Jan 02;46(1):90–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2016.1222808
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reid G. Probiotic use in an infectious disease setting. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(5):449–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2017.1300061
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008 Jul;3(7): 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.75
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romani Vestman N, Timby N, Holgerson P, Kressirer CA, Claesson R, Domellöf M, Öhman C, Tanner ACR, Hernell O, Johansson I. Characterization and in vitro properties of oral lactobacilli in breastfed infants. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13(1):193. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-193
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryan MP, O’Dwyer J, Adley CC. Evaluation of the complex nomenclature of the clinically and veterinary significant pathogen Salmonella. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3782182
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shah DH, Paul NC, Sischo WC, Crespo R, Guard J. Population dynamics and antimicrobial resistance of the most prevalent poultry-associated Salmonella serotypes. Poult Sci. 2017 Mar 1; 96(3): 687–702. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew342
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strus M. A new method for testing antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on selected pathogenic indicator bacteria (in Polish). Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1998;50:123–130
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tellez G, Pixley C, Wolfenden RE, Layton SL, Hargis BM. Probiotics/direct fed microbials for Salmonella control in poultry. Food Res Int. 2012;45(2):628–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tinrat S, Saraya S, Traidej Chomnawang M. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus salivarius MTC 1026 as a potential probiotic. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2011;57(6):365–378. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.57.365
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toro H, Price SB, McKee S, Hoerr FJ, Krehling J, Perdue M, Bauermeister L. Use of bacteriophages in combination with competitive exclusion to reduce Salmonella from infected chickens. Avian Dis. 2005 Mar;49(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1637/7286-100404R
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tropcheva R, Georgieva R, Danova S. Adhesion ability of Lactobacillus plantarum AC131. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2011 Jan;25(sup1) SUPPL. 4:121–124. https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2011.0123
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Trzeciak M, Wolna-Murawska A, Kosicka D. Wpływ preparatów probiotycznych na stan zdrowia i cechy hodowlane zwierząt. Kosmos (Stockh). 2016;65(1):57–67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vankerckhoven V, Huys G, Vancanneyt M, Vael C, Klare I, Romond MB, Entenza JM, Moreillon P, Wind RD, Knol J, et al. Biosafety assessment of probiotics used for human consumption: recommendations from the EU-PROSAFE project. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2008 Feb;19(2):102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.07.013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Varankovich NV, Nickerson MT, Korber DR. Probiotic-based strategies for therapeutic and prophylactic use against multiple gastrointestinal diseases. Front Microbiol. 2015 Jul 14;6(JUN):685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00685
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verdenelli MC, Ghelfi F, Silvi S, Orpianesi C, Cecchini C, Cresci A. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from human faeces. Eur J Nutr. 2009 Sep;48(6):355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0021-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vicente JL, Torres-Rodriguez A, Higgins SE, Pixley C, Tellez G, Donoghue AM, Hargis BM. Effect of a selected Lactobacillus spp. based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis-infected broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 2008 Mar;52(1):143–146. https://doi.org/10.1637/7847-011107-ResNote
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang CY, Lin PR, Ng CC, Shyu YT. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese pickled cabbage. Anaerobe. 2010;16(6):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.10.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang J, Guo H, Cao C, Zhao W, Kwok LY, Zhang H, Zhang W. Characterization of the adaptive amoxicillin resistance of Lactobacillus casei Zhang by proteomic analysis. Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 20;9(FEB):292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00292
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wright K, Wright H, Murray M. Probiotic treatment for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in geriatric patients: A multicentre randomised controlled pilot study. Australas J Ageing. 2015 Mar;34(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12116
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yeo S, Lee S, Park H, Shin H, Holzapfel W, Huh CS. Development of putative probiotics as feed additives: validation in a porcine-specific gastrointestinal tract model. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016; 100(23):10043–10054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7812-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zaczek A, Wojtasik A, Izdebski R, Gorecka E, Wojcik EA, Nowak T, Kwiecinski P, Dziadek J. PCR melting profile as a tool for outbreak studies of Salmonella enterica in chickens. BMC Vet Res. 2015 Dec;11(1):137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0451-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zeraik AE, Nitschke M. Influence of growth media and temperature on bacterial adhesion to polystyrene surfaces. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2012 Aug;55(4):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132012000400012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Anti-Salmonella Potential of New Lactobacillus Strains with the Application in the Poultry Industry

Abstract

Paradigm

My account