Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Relationship Between Teachers' Evaluations and Students' Learning Outcomes Using Multimedia Drills in Primary Education Cover

The Relationship Between Teachers' Evaluations and Students' Learning Outcomes Using Multimedia Drills in Primary Education

By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2011

References

  1. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001).(3rd ed.). Boston: Ally and Bacon.
  2. Boyle, T. (1997).Essex. England: Pearson Education Limited.
  3. Bos, M. (2003). Experienced teachers' expectations about the potential effectiveness of spelling exercises., 104-127.
  4. Diederen, J., Gruppen, H., Hartog, R., & Voragen, A. G. J. (2005). Design and evaluation of digital learning material to support acquisition of quantitative problem-solving skills within food chemistry.(5/6), 495-507.
  5. Herring, D. F., Notar, C. E., & Wilson, J. D. (2005). Multimedia software evaluation form for teachers.(1), 100-111.
  6. Higgins, K. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education.(2), 109-115.
  7. Hughes, I. E. (1998). "Horses for courses" - categories of computer-based learning program and their uses in pharmacology courses.(1/2), 35-44.
  8. Jacobson, E. (2006). Computer homework effectiveness in developmental mathematics.(3), 2-8.
  9. Kurz, T. L., & Middleton, J. A. (2006). Using a functional approach to change pre-service teachers' understanding of mathematics software.(1), 45-65.
  10. Luik, P. (2007). Characteristics of drills related to development of skills.(1), 56-68.
  11. Luik, P. (2009). Effective characteristics of learning multimedia. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.),(pp. 167-188). New York, London: IGI Global.
  12. Mei-Yan, L., Walker, D. F., & Huang, J. (1999). Do they look at educational multimedia differently than we do? A study of software evaluation in Taiwan and the United States.(1), 31-42.
  13. Mikk, J., & Luik, P. (2003). Characteristics of multimedia textbook that affect post-test scores.(4), 528-537.
  14. Ngu, B. H., & Rethinasamy, S. (2006). Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English prepositions.(1), 41-55.
  15. Nurmi, S., & Lehti, S. (2003). European teachers' expectations and opinions about learning objects.August 29, 2003; Padova, Italy.
  16. Phillips, R. (1997).London: Kogan Page
  17. Rana, P. K. (2002). Evaluation of Web-Based Learning Systems used in the primary education sector. Unpublished Master's thesis, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom. Retrieved May 15, 2004, from
  18. Trotter, A. (1998).Retrieved July 20, 2004, from
  19. Van den Bergh, O., & Vrana, S. R. (1998). Repetition and boredom in a perceptual fluency/attributional model of affective judgements.(4), 533-553.
  20. Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform.(2/3), 127-132.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-009-0054-x | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 69
Published on: Feb 21, 2011
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2011 Piret Luik, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.