Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences Cover

An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Abdi, R., 2002. Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139-145.10.1177/14614456020040020101
  2. Akbas, E., 2012. Exploring metadiscourse in masters’ dissertation abstracts: Cultural and linguistic variation across postgraduate writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-26.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.1p.12
  3. Alexandrov, A. and Hennerici, M., 2006. Writing good abstracts. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2007 (23), pp. 256-259.10.1159/000098324
  4. Alotaibi, H., 2014. Metadiscourse in Arabic and English research article abstracts. World Journal of English Language, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-8.10.5430/wjel.v5n2p1
  5. Bal-Gezegin, B., 2016. A Corpus-based investigation of metadiscourse in academic book reviews. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232 (2016), pp. 713-718.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.097
  6. Cao, F. and Hu, G., 2014. Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 66, pp. 15-31.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
  7. Carrió-Pastor, M.L., 2021. The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language. Assessing Writing, vol. 50, n.p.10.1016/j.asw.2021.100560
  8. Creswell, J. W., 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 4th Ed. SAGE.
  9. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steffensen, M., 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of text written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39-7110.1177/0741088393010001002
  10. Estaji, M. and Vafaeimehr, R., 2015. A comparative analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of mechanical and electrical engineering research papers. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37-56.
  11. Farahani, M. V., 2019. Metadiscourse in academic English texts: A corpus-based probe into British academic written English corpus. Studies about Languages, no. 34, pp. 56-73.10.5755/j01.sal.0.34.21816
  12. Farahani, M. and Sabetifard, M., 2017. Metadiscourse features in English news writing among English native and Iranian writers: A comparative corpus-based inquiry. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1249-1260.10.17507/tpls.0712.12
  13. Farzannia, S. and Farnia, M., 2016. Metadiscourse markers in introduction sections of Persian and English mining engineering articles. English for Specific Purposes World, vol. 17, no. 49, pp. 1-16.
  14. Fu, X. and Hyland, K., 2014. Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Constuction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 122-144.10.1075/etc.7.1.05fu
  15. Gillaerts, P. and Velde, F., 2010. Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstract. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 128-139.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
  16. Hyland, K., 1998. Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal for Study Discourse, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 349-382.10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  17. Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
  18. Hyland, K. and Tse, P., 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  19. Kan, M.O., 2016. The use of interactional metadiscourse: A comparison of articles on Turkish education and literature. Eductional Science: Theory & Practice, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1639-1648.
  20. Karimi, K., Maleki, M. and Farnia, M., 2017. Metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of Persian and English law articles. International Journal of Foreign Language & Research, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 69-83.
  21. Kawase, T., 2015. Metadiscourse in the introduction of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 114-124.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006
  22. Khedri, M., Chan, S. and Ebrahimi, S., 2013. An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 319-331.10.1177/1461445613480588
  23. Kuhi, D. and Mojood, M., 2014. Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian editorials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 98, pp. 1046-1055.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515
  24. Kuhi, D. and Mousavi, Z., 2015. A diachronic study of interpersonality in research articles’ discussion sections: The field of applied linguistics. International Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 6-13.
  25. Kumar, R., 2011. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. 3rd ed. SAGE.
  26. Lo, Y.Y., Othman, J. and Lim, J.W., 2020. The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 271-282.10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25069
  27. Mansouri, S., Najafabadi, M. and Boroujeni, S., 2016. Metadiscourse in research article abstract: A cross lingual and disciplinary investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 296-307.
  28. McGrath, L. and Kuteeva, M., 2012. Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 161-173.10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002
  29. Mocanu, M., 2015. An empirical analysis of metadiscourse in the abstracts of Romanian accounting research articles. Accounting and Management Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 362-377.
  30. Moghadam, F., 2017. Persuasion in journalism: A study of metadiscourse in texts by native speaker of English and Iranian EFL writers. Theory and Practice in English Studies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 483-495.10.17507/tpls.0706.11
  31. Ozdemir, N. and Longo, B., 2014. Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141 (2014), pp. 59-63.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.011
  32. Pooresfahani, A., Khajavy, G. and Vahidnia, F., 2012. A contrastive study of metadiscourse elements in research articles written by Iranian applied linguistics and engineering writers in English. English Linguistics Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 88-96.10.5430/elr.v1n1p88
  33. Salar, S. and Ghonsooly, B., 2016. A comparative analysis of metadiscourse features in knowledge management research articles written in English and Persian. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15-27.10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1154
  34. Samar, R. and Yazdanmehr, E., 2013. Comparing interpersonal metadiscourse in English and Persian abstracts of Iranian applied linguistics journals. International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1090-1101.
  35. Vande Kopple, W., 1985. Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 82-93.10.2307/357609
  36. Wang, L. and Zhang, Y., 2016. An analysis of metadiscourse in the abstract of English academic papers. Global Journals Inc., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 8-15.
  37. Williams, J., 1981. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  38. Xin, J. and Yan, S., 2016. Analyzing metadiscourse in the English abstracts of BA theses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 210-215.10.17507/jltr.0701.24
  39. Yüksel, H.G. and Kavanoz, S., 2018. Dimension of experience: Metadiscourse in the texts of novice non-native, novice native and expert native speaker. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 104-112.10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.104
  40. Zhou, Q., 2014. A contrast study of metadiscourse in abstract. Foreign Language Research, vol. 3, pp.
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 49
Published on: Dec 26, 2022
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Lin Ruonan, Ghayth Kamel Shaker Al-Shaibani, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.