Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analytical Modelling and Parametric Optimization of Hybrid Hydrogen-Electric Propulsion for Long-Endurance UAVs Cover

Analytical Modelling and Parametric Optimization of Hybrid Hydrogen-Electric Propulsion for Long-Endurance UAVs

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Tak YC, Abedin T, Koh SPJ, Pasupuleti J, et al. 2025. Drone endurance in hydrogen fuel cell hybrid technologies: power architectures and design strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 225:114952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116161
  2. Özbek E, ªahin M, Aksoy H, Yilmaz O. 2020. Evaluation of design methodology, limitations, and performance of a mini UAV designed for hybrid fuel cell flight. Renew Energy. 162:1134–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118757
  3. Farajollahi AH, Dincer I. 2022. A hybrid-electric propulsion system for an unmanned aerial vehicle. Energy Sources Part A. 44(8):10923–10938. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2051644
  4. Li H, Wang C, Yuan S, Zhu H, Liu Y, Sun L. 2025. Energy scheduling of hydrogen hybrid UAV based on model predictive control and deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm. Algorithms. 18(2):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18020080
  5. Matlock J, Porter S, Hargrove C. 2019. Evaluation of energy-efficient propulsion technologies for unmanned aerial vehicles. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng. 43(2):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2018-0231
  6. Amici C, Corrado A, De Luca F. 2021. Review of propulsion system design strategies for UAVs. Appl Sci. 11(11):5209. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115209
  7. Dobrokhodov V, Smearcheck M, Jones K. 2020. Achievable endurance of hybrid UAV operating in time-varying environments. In: AIAA Aviation Forum; 2020. Paper 2020-2197. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2197
  8. Ren X, Wang Y, Sun J, Liu Z. 2024. Assessment and conceptual design of a SOFC/TIG/TEG integrated propulsion configuration. Int J Energy Res. 48(7):8052–8068.
  9. Jayakumar SS, Rajendran S, Prakash R, Kumar N, et al. 2024. Design, control, aerodynamic performances, and structural optimization of small hybrid UAV. Sci Rep. 14:54174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54174-x
  10. Shen Z, Liu S, Zhu W, Ren D, Xu Q Feng Y. 2024. A review on key technologies and developments of hydrogen fuel cell multi-rotor drones. Energies. 17(16):4193. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164193
  11. Filippone A. 2008. Comprehensive analysis of transport aircraft flight performance. Prog Aerosp Sci. 44(3):192–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.10.005
  12. Lyu Y, Liem RP. 2020. Flight performance analysis with data-driven mission parameterization. Transp Eng. 2:100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2020.100035
  13. Puranik T, et al. 2020. Aircraft performance model calibration and validation for general aviation safety analysis. J Aircraft. 57(4):678–688. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C035458
  14. Camilleri W, et al. 2012. Design and validation of a detailed aircraft performance model for trajectory optimisation. In: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conf.; 2012. Paper 2012-4566. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012–4566
  15. Mason W. 1990. Analytic models for technology integration in aircraft design. In: AIAA Aircraft Design Systems and Operations Conf.; 1990. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1990-3262
  16. Mulder JA, et al. 1979. Analysis of aircraft performance, stability and control measurements. AGARD Lect Series. 104.
  17. Filippone A. 2012. Advanced aircraft flight performance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139161893
  18. Sun J. 2019. Open aircraft performance modelling: based on analysis of aircraft surveillance data. Delft: TU Delft.
  19. Welstead JR, et al. 2018. An overview of the layered and extensible aircraft performance system (LEAPS). In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting; 2018. Paper 2018–1754. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1754
  20. Rayner JMV. 2001. Thrust and drag in flying birds: applications. In: Fixed and flapping wing aerodynamics for MAV applications. p. 217–230. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600866654.0217.0230
  21. Rayner JMV. 2001. Mathematical modelling of the avian flight power curve. Math Methods Appl Sci. 24(17–18):1485–1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.196
  22. Rayner JMV. 1999. Estimating power curves of flying vertebrates. J Exp Biol. 202(23):3449–3461. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202.23.3449
  23. Raymer DP, et al. 2011. Advanced technology subsonic transport study: N+3 technologies and design concepts. NASA CR–2011.
  24. Torenbeek E. 2013. Advanced aircraft design: conceptual design, analysis and optimization of subsonic civil airplanes. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568101
  25. Torenbeek E. 2013. Synthesis of subsonic airplane design. Berlin: Springer.
  26. Torenbeek E. 1995. Optimum cruise performance of subsonic transport aircraft. Netherlands Participating Organizations.
  27. Torenbeek E. 1991. Aerodynamic performance of wing-body configurations and the flying wing. SAE Trans. p. 158–163. https://doi.org/10.4271/911019
  28. Panagiotou P, Yakinthos K. 2020. Aerodynamic efficiency and performance enhancement of fixed-wing UAVs. Aerosp Sci Technol. 99:105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105575
  29. Bliamis C, et al. 2021. Aerodynamic and stability analysis of a VTOL flying-wing UAV. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 1024:012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1024/1/012039
  30. Chen L, et al. 2020. Aerodynamic performance and transition prediction of low-speed fixed-wing UAVs. Aerosp Sci Technol. 107:106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106281
  31. Fry JM, Farhood M. 2019. A comprehensive analytical tool for control validation of fixed-wing UAVs. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 28(5):1785–1801. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2019.2923649
  32. Løw-Hansen B, et al. 2025. Modeling and identification of a small fixed-wing UAV using estimated aerodynamic angles. CEAS Aeronaut J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00816-3
  33. Karkadakattil A. 2025. Laser-based thorium processing and utilization for in-situ nuclear power generation in space exploration: a comprehensive review. Acceleron Aerosp J. 5(1):1258–1273. https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2540
  34. Karkadakattil A. 2025. AI-tuned hybrid thermal control of CubeSats using phase change material: a MATLAB-based simulation study. Adv Space. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-025-00416-3
  35. Khan W, Nahon M. 2016. Modeling dynamics of agile fixed-wing UAVs for real-time applications. In: ICUAS Conf.; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016. 7502599
  36. Götten F, et al. 2021. Full configuration drag estimation of short-to-medium range fixed-wing UAVs and its impact on initial sizing optimization. CEAS Aeronaut J. 12(3):589–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00522-w
  37. Karkadakattil A. 2025. AI-based predictive laser beam control for UAV interception in directed energy weapon systems using velocity-based trajectory prediction. Acceleron Aerosp J. 5(2):1331–1349. https://doi.org/10.61359/11.2106-2545
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 37
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 9, 2026
Published on: Mar 14, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Aswin Karkadakattil, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.