References
- Blair, G. (2005). Donald Trump: Master apprentice. Simon & Schuster.
- Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Routledge.
- Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. University Press.
- Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the commodification of public discourse. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–68.
- Fairclough, N., & Wodak R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). Sage.
- Finnegan, M. (2016, September 25). Scope of Trump’s falsehoods unprecedented for a modern presidential candidate. Los Angeles Times.https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-false-statements-20160925-snap-story.html
- Freeden, M. Sargent, T., & Stears, M. (2013). The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001
- Gil Bonilla, J. (2018). A critical-cognitive analysis of Donald Trump’s discourse across time: Trump as a businessman versus Trump as a president. In M. Díaz, G. Vaamonde, A. Varela, Mª C. Cabeza, & J. M. García-Miguel e Fernando Ramallo (Eds.), XIII Congreso Internacional Lingüística Xeral (pp. 409–416). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6506563
- Hart, C. (2014). Contemporary critical discourse studies. Bloomsbury.
- Jaffe, A. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford University.
- Johnston, D. (2016). The making of Donald Trump. Melville House Publishing.
- Kitagawa, C. & Lehrer, A. (1990). Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 739–759.
- Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. In C. Ramón (Ed.), The Spanish translation (pp. 372–897). Cambridge University Press.
- O’Halloran, K. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh University Press.
- Trump, D., & Schwartz, T. (1987). The art of the deal. Random House.
- van Dijk, T. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction and cognition. Erlbaum.
- van Dijk, T. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Benjamin Publishing Company.
- van Dijk, T. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (p. 1733). Dartmouth Publishing.
- van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
- van Dijk, T. (1998a). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.
- van Dijk, T. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University.
- van Dijk, T. (2001). Levels and dimensions of Critical Discourse Analysis. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 99–101). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n5
- van Dijk, T. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140.
- van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
- van Dijk, T. (2013). News as discourse. Routledge.
- Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1, 254–261.
- Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of CDA (pp. 81–115). Sage.
- Zwick, J. (2010, April 10). Donald Trump for President? The Washington Independent. https://web.archive.org/web/20101008062443/http://washingtonindependent.com/99472/donald-trump-for-president