Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Desperate Call for Process and Post-Process Approach in Lithuanian ESL Classrooms Cover

A Desperate Call for Process and Post-Process Approach in Lithuanian ESL Classrooms

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Asano, E. (2017). How Much Time Do People Spend on Social Media? Infographic. Retrieved from https://www.socialmediatoday.com/marketing/how-much-time-do-people-spend-social-media-infographic.
  2. Atkinson, D. (2016). Second Language Writing and Culture. In R. M. Manchón &P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing (pp. 545–566).10.1515/9781614511335-028
  3. Arteaga-Lara, H. M. (2017). Using the Process-Genre Approach to Improve Fourth-Grade EFL Learners’ Paragraph Writing. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 10(2), 217–244.10.5294/laclil.2017.10.2.3
  4. Badger, R. &G. White. 2000. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160.10.1093/elt/54.2.153
  5. Belcher, D., &Braine, G. (1995). Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  6. Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s Blogging: A Generation 1.5 Student Enters the Blogosphere. Language Learning &Technology, 11(2), 128–141.
  7. Breuch, L. K. (2003). Post-Process ‘Pedagogy’: A Philosophical Exercise. In V. Villanueva &K. L. Arola (Eds.), Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader (pp. 97-125).
  8. Celce-Murcia, M. (2000). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed). Heinle &Heinle.
  9. Collier, V. P. (1989). How Long? A Synthesis of Research on Academic Achievement in a Second Language. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 509–531.10.2307/3586923
  10. Cummins, J. (2016). Reflections on Cummins (1980), The Cross-Lingual Dimensions of Language Proficiency: Implications for Bilingual Education and the Optimal Age Issue. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 940–944. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.339.10.1002/tesq.339
  11. Česnienė, Z. (2015). Rašymo įgūdžių tobulinimas taikant studentų tarpusavio vertinimo metodą. Pedagogy, 120(4), 61–72
  12. De Freitas Villas Boas, I. (2014). Process Writing in a Product-Oriented Context: Challenges and Possibilities. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada, 14(2), 463–490.10.1590/S1984-63982014005000011
  13. Ellis, R. (2002). The Place of Grammar Instruction in the Second/Foreign Curriculum. In E. Hinkel &S. Fotos (Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 17–34).
  14. Ferguson, G. (2012). Barbara Seidlhofer: Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford University Press, 2011. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 463–465.10.1093/applin/ams035
  15. Hairston, M. (2002). The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing. In D. Jolliffe, D. Keene, M. Trachsel, &R. Voss (Eds.), Against the Grain: A Volume in Honor of Maxine Hairston (pp. 29–44).
  16. Hashemnezhad, H. (2012). A Comparative Study of Product, Process, and Post-process Approaches in Iranian EFL Students’ Writing Skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 722–729. DOI doi:10.4304/jltr.3.4.722-729.10.4304/jltr.3.4.722-729
  17. Hakuta, K, Butler, Y.G., Witt, D. (2000). How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Proficiency? The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Policy Report 2000–2001. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/%282000%29%20-%20HOW%20LONG%20DOES%20IT%20TAKE%20ENGLISH%20LEARNERS%20TO%20ATTAIN%20PR.pdf.
  18. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410609427
  19. Hirokawa, K., &Swales, J. (1986). The Effects of Modifying the Formality Level of ESL Composition Questions. TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 343–345.10.2307/3586551
  20. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-810.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
  21. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524650
  22. Kalan, A. (2014). A Practice-Oriented Definition of Post-Process Second Language Writing Theory. TESL Canada Journal, 32(1), 1–18.10.18806/tesl.v32i1.1196
  23. Kantar TNS. (2017). Žiniasklaidos tyrimų apžvalga 2017. Retrieved from http://www.tns.lt/data/files/Metines_apzvalgos/Kantar_TNS_Metinė_žiniasklaidos_tyrimų_apžvalga_2017m.pdf.
  24. Kent, T. I. (ed. and introd.). (1999). Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm.
  25. Kroll, B. (1991). Teaching Writing in the ESL Context. In M. Celce-Murcia (Eds.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 219–232).
  26. Leki, I. (1995). Coping Strategies of ESL Students in Writing Tasks Across the Curriculum. TESOL Quaterly. 29(2), 235–260. DOI doi.org/10.2307/3587624.10.2307/3587624
  27. Lindemann, E. (1982). Rhetoric for writing teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Office of Ombudsman for Academic Ethic and Procedures of the Republic of Lithuania. (2018). Petras Baršauskas violated the law on the Adjustment of public and private interests in the civil service. Retrieved from http://www.etika.gov.lt/2018/01/2018-01-17-petras-barsauskas-violated-the-law-on-the-adjustment-of-public-and-private-interests-in-the-civil-service/.
  29. Miliūnaitė, R. (2014). Mokytojai Apie Informacinių Technologijų Poveikį Mokinių Raštingumui. Bendrinė Kalba, 87, 1–16.
  30. Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: from testing to teaching. English Language Teaching Journal, 21(1), 1–25.10.1093/elt/49.1.13
  31. Pullman, G. (1999). Stepping Yet Again into the Same Current. In T. Kent (Ed.), Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm (pp. 16–29).
  32. Scollon, S. (1999). Not to Waste Words or Students: Confucian and Socratic Discourse in the Tertiary Classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 13–27).
  33. Smith, K. (2018). 121 Amazing Social Media Statistics and Facts. Retrieved from https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/amazing-social-media-statistics-and-facts/.
  34. Sun, Y.C., Chang, Y.J. (2012). Blogging to Learn: Becoming EF Academic Writers Through Collaborative Dialogues. Language Learning &Technology, 16(1), 43–61.
  35. Ware, P., Kern, R., &Warschauer, M. (2016). The development of digital literacies. In P. K. Matsuda &R. K. Manchón (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 307–28).10.1515/9781614511335-017
  36. Xu, X., &Li, X. (2018). Teaching Academic Writing through a Process-Genre Approach: A Pedagogical Exploration of an EAP Program in China. TESL-EJ, 22(2), 1–21.
  37. Zheng, B., Yim, S., &Warschauer, M. (2016). Social Media in the writing classroom and beyond. In J. I. Liontas (ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching.10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0555
  38. Žindžiuvienė, I. (2003). Rašomosios anglų kalbos ugdymo paradigmos svarbiausios gairės. In Acta paedagogica Vilnensia, 11, 19–28.10.15388/ActPaed.2003.11.9594
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2018-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2335-2027 | Journal ISSN: 2335-2019
Language: English
Page range: 210 - 224
Published on: Dec 19, 2018
Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Vaida Misevičiūtė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.