References
- Li S, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. The cardiovascular disease landscape in China: a health systems perspective. In: Cardiovascular disease: global perspectives. Springer; 2023. p. 217–239.
- Yamashita Y, Aoyama S, Sugimura M, et al. Outcomes of a smartphone-based application with live health-coaching post-percutaneous coronary intervention. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(6): 3917–3925.
- Wang Y, Wang Q, He L, et al. Effects of the hospital-community-family trinity cardiac rehabilitation on patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10: 1132177.
- Mattioli AV, Sciomer S, Moscucci F, et al. Comparison between hybrid cardiac rehabilitation and standard care: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(7): 1115–1122.
- Quenard F, Lecoffre E, Gabet A, et al. Socio-geographical factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation participation: A mixed-methods study in rural France. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2024;31(5): 853–861.
- Fruytier L, Serban IB, Van de Sande DAJP, et al. Exploring the needs and preferences of athletes in cardiac (tele)rehabilitation to enhance rehabilitation outcome: A qualitative study. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2025;19: 685–698.
- Zhang Y, Zhao J, and Sun J. Internet-based telerehabilitation guidance brings additional benefits to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. The Heart Surgery Forum. 2023;26(6): E926–E933.
- Li X, Wang H, Liu Y, et al. Remote health management via WeChat to improve quality of life post-percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Med Inform. 2022;158: 104624.
- Cruz-Cobo C, Bernal-Jiménez MA, Calle-Pérez G, et al. Efficacy of a mobile health app (eMOTIVA) in compliance with cardiac rehabilitation guidelines in patients with coronary artery disease: Randomized controlled clinical trial. JMIR Preprints. 2023 Dec 13. E55421. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.55421.
- Lindman C, Sandberg G, Carlsson J, et al. Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction: the remote exercise SWEDEHEART study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024;31(2): 241–249.
- Pini M. Comparison between center-based cardiac rehabilitation and home-based telerehabilitation regarding short-term health outcomes. Bern, Switzerland: University of Bern; 2024.
- Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/Scoping-.pdf. [Accessed 21 May 2025].
- Sato T, Suzuki D, Sasamoto Y, et al. Impact of online support of physical activity management using a wearable device on renal function in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial protocol. PeerJ. 2025;13: e19067.
- Chen J, Lu M, Wang W, et al. Study on the management effect of chronic disease intelligent information management platform in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients. J Healthc Eng. 2023;2023:8837745.
- Hambrecht R, Walther C, Möbius-Winkler S, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A randomized trial. Circulation. 2004;109(11): 1371–1378.
- Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140(1): e69–e89.
- Thomas RJ, Balady G, Banka G, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation. 2018;137(24): e1000–e1024.
- Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corra U, et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2020;27(19): 1994–2006.