References
- Anthropic. (2024b). Prompt engineering overview. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from
https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/overview - Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., Checchi, K. D., & Munier, V. (2023). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students' argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 761–806.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21816 - Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (Eds.). (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Sense Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7 - Bahr, J. L., Höft, L., Lipnevich, A., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2025). Exploring students' receptivity to feedback: A latent profile analysis. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2025.2467676 - Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 23.
- Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402 - Bouwer, R., & van der Veen, C. (2024). Write, talk and rewrite: the effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education. Reading and Writing, 37(6), 1435–1456.
- Chen, W., Han, Y., Tan, J., Chai, A. S. C., Lyu, Q., & Lyna. (2024). Exploring students' computer-supported collaborative argumentation with socioscientific issues. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3324–3337.
- Chen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024). The role of individual preparation before collaboration: An exploratory study on students' computer-supported collaborative argumentation in a primary classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(4–5), 757–798.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2397761 - Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally-Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253–277.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560944 - Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967.
- Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school Students' Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870 - Eemeren, F. H. van, Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (2015). Argumentation (pp. 3–25). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_1 - Eggert, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Students' use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: An application of the Rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94(2), 230–258.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20358 - Friedrichsen, P., Sadler, T., Graham, K., & Brown, P. (2016). Design of a socio-scientific issue curriculum unit: Antibiotic resistance, natural selection, and modeling. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(1).
- Graham, S., Skar, G. B., & Falk, D. Y. (2021). Teaching writing in the primary grades in Norway: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 34, 529–563.
- Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students' argumentation skills and task motivation. Computers & Education, 203, 104862.
- Heitmann, P., Hecht, M., Schwanewedel, J., & Schipolowski, S. (2014). Students' Argumentative Writing Skills in Science and First-Language Education: Commonalities and differences. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3148–3170.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.962644 - Hoffmann, M. H., & Lingle, J. A. (2015). Facilitating problem-based learning by means of collaborative argument visualization software. Teaching Philosophy, 38(4), 371–398.
- Höft, L., Meyer, J., Bernholt, S., & Jansen, T. (2025). A situated perspective on CONIC: Evidence of compensatory effects of conscientiousness and situational interest on the task level. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 81, 102375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102375 - Huang, C. J., Chang, S. C., Chen, H. M., Tseng, J. H., & Chien, S. Y. (2015). A group intelligence-based asynchronous argumentation learning-assistance platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1408–1427.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1016533 - Hubbart, J. A. (2025). Why We Must Argue: A Critique of the Essence, Purpose, and Craftsmanship of Argumentation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 231–250.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.133016 - Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015). The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1), 32–58.
- Jansen, T., Höft, L., Bahr, L., Kuklick, L., & Meyer, J. (2025) Constructive feedback can function as a reward: Students' emotional profiles in reaction to feedback perception mediate associations with task interest. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102030.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102030 - Jansen, T., Höft, L., Bahr, L., Fleckenstein, J., Möller, J., Köller, O., & Meyer, J. (2024) Comparing Generative AI and Expert Feedback to Students' Writing: Insights from Student Teachers. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 71(2), 80–92.
- Keller, S. D., Fleckenstein, J., Krüger, M., Köller, O., & Rupp, A. A. (2020). English writing skills of students in upper secondary education: Results from an empirical study in Switzerland and Germany. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100700.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100700 - Keller, S. D., Lohmann, J., Trüb, R., Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., & Möller, J. (2024). Language quality, content, structure: What analytic ratings tell us about EFL writing skills at upper secondary school level in Germany and Switzerland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101129 - Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849–871.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200707 - Klaver, L. T., M. Sins, P. H., & F. Guérin, L. J. (2023). Students' engagement with Socioscientific issues: Use of sources of knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 1125–1161.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21828 - Kuhn, D., & Moore, W. (2015). Argumentation as core curriculum. Learning: Research and practice, 1(1), 66–78.
- Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and instruction, 15(3), 287–315.
- Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child development, 74(5), 1245–1260.
- Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019). Counter-arguing during curriculum-supported peer interaction facilitates middle-school students' science content knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 453–482.
- Lin, Y., & Hung, C. (2025). The synergistic effects in an AI-supported online scientific argumentation learning environment. Computers & Education, 229, 105251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105251 - Meta. (2024b). Prompting. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from
https://www.llama.com/docs/how-to-guides/prompting/#prompting - Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students' text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199 - Meincke, L., Mollick, E., Mollick, L., & Shapiro, D. (2025). Prompting Science Report 1: Prompt Engineering is Complicated and Contingent. ArXiv.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04818 - Mikeska, J. N., Francis, D. C., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Park Rogers, M., Shekell, C., Bharaj, P. K., Howell, H., Maltese, A., Thompson, M., & Reich, J. (2025). Promoting preservice teachers' facilitation of argumentation in mathematics and science through digital simulations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 154, 104858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104858 - Mistral AI. (2024b). Prompting capabilities.
https://docs.mistral.ai/guides/prompting_capabilities/ - Naik, A., Yin, J. R., Kamath, A., Ma, Q., Wu, S. T., Murray, R. C., ... & Rose, C. P. (2025). Providing tailored reflection instructions in collaborative learning using large language models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 531–550.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13548 - Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of science education, 21(5), 553–576.
- NGSS. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/18290 - Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students' argumentative essay quality. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12757–12784.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y - Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 - Nussbaum, E. M., Winsor, D. L., Aqui, Y. M., & Poliquin, A. M. (2007). Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 479–500.
- OpenAI. (2024b). Six strategies for getting better results. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from
https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering/six-strategies-for-getting-better-results - Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.
- Osborne, J., & Pimentel, D. (2022). Science, misinformation, and the role of education. Science (New York, N.Y.), 378(6617), 246–248.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq8093 - Peltzer, K., Lira Lorca, A., Krause, U., & Busse, V. (2024). Effects of formative feedback on argumentative writing in English and cross-linguistic transfer to German. Learning and Instruction, 92, 101935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101935 - Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351 - Romero Ariza, M., Quesada Armenteros, A., & Estepa Castro, A. (2024). Promoting critical thinking through mathematics and science teacher education: the case of argumentation and graphs interpretation about climate change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 41–59.
- Ruwe, T., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023). “Your argumentation is good”, says the AI vs humans – The role of feedback providers and personalised language for feedback effectiveness. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100189 - Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21006 -
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. doi: 10.1002/tea.20009
SadlerT. D. 2004 Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 5 513 536 10.1002/tea.20009
- Schaller, N. J., Ding, Y., Horbach, A., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2024, June). Fairness in Automated Essay Scoring: A Comparative Analysis of Algorithms on German Learner Essays from Secondary Education. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024) (pp. 210–221).
- Schaller, N. J., Horbach, A., Höft, L. I., Ding, Y., Bahr, J. L., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2024, May). DARIUS: A Comprehensive Learner Corpus for Argument Mining in German-Language Essays. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (pp. 4356–4367).
- Sahoo, P., Singh, A. K., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., & Chadha, A. (2024). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.07927 - Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Büchel, D. (2025). Using the socioscientific issue approach to foster secondary students' argumentation skills, science self-efficacy beliefs and science interest. International Journal of Science Education, 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2460050 - Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4(1–2), 1–98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570 - Wambsganss, T., Kueng, T., Soellner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021, May). ArgueTutor: An adaptive dialog-based learning system for argumentation skills. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13).
- Skulmowski, A. (2024). Placebo or assistant? Generative AI between externalization and anthropomorphization. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 58.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09894-x - Tavsanli, O. F., Graham, S., & Cao, Y. (2024). The Effect of the Write, Talk, and Rewrite Dialogic Writing Treatment on Argumentative Texts: a Replication Study in Türkiye. Educational Psychology Review, 36(4), 114.
- Yang, Y., Xia, Q., Liu, C., & Chiu, T. K. (2025). The impact of TPACK on teachers' willingness to integrate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): The moderating role of negative emotions and the buffering effects of need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 154, 104877.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104877 - Yang, C., Wang, X., Lu, Y., Liu, H., Le, Q. V., Zhou, D., & Chen, X. (2023, September). Large language models as optimizers. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
https://openreview.net/pdf?id=Bb4VGOWELI - Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socio-scientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7