Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Subject-didactical Typology of Social Science Teachers Cover

Subject-didactical Typology of Social Science Teachers

Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL)
Volume 8 (2025): Issue 1 (March 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Anderson J., Taner, G. (2023). Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education. <em>Educational Research Review</em>, 38. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485</a>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Blömeke, S. Jentsch, A, Ross, N., Kaiser, G. &amp; König, J. (2022): Opening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress. <em>Learning and Instruction</em>, 79. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Brühwiler, C., Helmke, A., &amp; Schrader, F.-W. (2017): Determinanten der Schulleistung. In M. Schweer (Ed.), <em>Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion</em> (3rd ed., p. 291–314). Springer VS: Wiesbaden.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Burns, A., Siegel, J. (2018): International Perspectives on teaching the four skills. Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing. Cham: Springer.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). <em>Effective Teacher Professional Development.</em> Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. <a href="https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311</a>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Edovald T., Nevill C. (2021). Working out what works: The case of the Education Endowment Foundation in England. <em>ECNU Review of Education</em>, 4(1), p. 46–64.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Engartner, T., Hedtke, R., &amp; Zurstrassen, B. (2020). <em>Sozialwissenschaftliche Bildung. Politik - Wirtschaft – Gesellschaft.</em> (1st ed.). Brill, Schöningh.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Deng, L, (2007): Subject Matter: Defining and Theorizing School Subjects. In Conelly, F.M. (Ed.), <em>The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction</em>. SAGE Publishing: London, p. 66–90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Gates Foundation (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial Findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Hartinger, A., Kleickmann, T., &amp; Hawelka, B. (2006). Der Einfluss von Lehrervorstellungen zum Lernen und Lehren auf die Gestaltung des Unterrichts und auf motivationale Schülervariablen. <em>Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9</em>(1), 110–126.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Helmke, A. (2021): <em>Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität. Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts</em> (8th ed.). Kallmeyer.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Hericks, U., Körber, A. (2007). Methodologische Perspektiven quantitativer und rekonstruktiver Fachkulturforschung in der Schule. In J. Lüders (Ed.), <em>Fachkulturforschung in der Schule</em> (p. 31–48). Barbara Budrich: Leverkusen.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Hoidn, S., Reusser, K.(2020): Foundations of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching. In: Hoidn, Sabinde, Klemencic, Manja (Eds.), <em>The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education</em> (p. 17–46). Routledge: London,
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Jamieson, S. (2004): Likert Scales: How to (Ab)use Them. <em>Medical Education, 38</em>(12), p. 1217–1218.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Goldschmidt, N., Kron, R., &amp; Rehm, M. (2024). Marktwirtschaft und Unternehmertum in Schulbüchern. Potsdam and Berlin.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Kesteloot, C., Bagnoli, L. (2021): Human and physical geography: can we learn something from the history of their relations?, <em>Belgeo,</em> 4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.52627" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.52627</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Klieme, E., Hartig, J., Rauch, D.(2008): The Concept of Competence in Educational Contexts. In Hartig, J. Klieme, E., Leutner, D. (Eds.), <em>Assessment of Competencies in Educational Contexts (p. 3–23).</em> Hogrefe: Göttingen
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. E. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., Reusser, K. (2009): The Pythagoras study. In: T. Janik, T., Seidel, T. (Eds.), <em>The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (</em>p. 137–160). Waxmann: Münster
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., &amp; Baumert, J. (2006). Lehrerbelastung und Unterrichtsqualität aus der Perspektive von Lehrenden und Lernenden. <em>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 20</em>(3), 161–173.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., &amp; Neubrand, M. (2011). <em>Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften – Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV.</em> Waxmann: Münster
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Löfström, J., &amp; Grammes, T. (2020). Outlining similarities and differences in civics education in Europe – a starter kit for transnational European research: Editorial. <em>JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, 19</em>(1). <a href="https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-3336" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-3336</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Lynch K., Hill H. C., Gonzalez K. E., Pollard C. (2019). Strengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis. <em>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis</em>, 41(3), p. 260–293.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Mattisek, A., &amp; Sakdapolrak, P. (2016). Gesellschaft und Umwelt. In T. Freytag, H. Gebhardt, U. Gerhard, D. Wastl-Walter (Eds.), <em>Humangeographie kompakt</em> (p.13–37). Springer: Wiesbaden
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Meyer, H. (2016): <em>Was ist guter Unterricht?</em> (15th ed.). Cornelsen: Berlin.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Michalik, K., Murmann, L. (2007). Sachunterricht - zur Fachkultur eines Integrationsfaches. In J. Lüders (Ed.), <em>Fachkulturforschung in der Schule</em> (p.101–116). Barbara Budrich: Leverkusen
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (MSWWF) (1999). Sozialwissenschaften. Richtlinien und Lehrpläne für die Sekundarstufe II – Gymnasium/Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Düsseldorf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung Nordrhein-Westfalen (no date). Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialwissenschaften/Wirtschaft. Übersicht über die Operatoren. [<a href="https://www.standardsicherung.schulministerium.nrw.de/cms/zentralabitur-gost/faecher/getfile.php?file=4037" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://www.standardsicherung.schulministerium.nrw.de/cms/zentralabitur-gost/faecher/getfile.php?file=4037</a>]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Ministerium für Schule, Weiterbildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes NRW (1999). Richtlinien und Lehrpläne für die Sekundarstufe II – Gymnasium/Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Sozialwissenschaften. Düsseldorf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Neubrand, M., Jordan, A., Krauss, S., Blum, W., Löwen, K. (2013). Task Analysis in COACTIV: Examining the Potential for Cognitive Activation in German Mathematics Classrooms. In Kunter, M., Baumert, J. Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S. &amp; Neubrand, M. (Eds.), <em>Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project</em> (p. 125 – 146). Springer: New York.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. <em>Advances in Health Science Education</em>, <em>15</em>(5), p. 625–632.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Oelkers, J., Reusser, K. (2008). Qualität entwickeln – Standards sichern – mit Differenz umgehen. In <em>Bildungsforschung</em> Vol. 27. Berlin. (<a href="https://edudoc.ch/record/86369/files/expertise_oelkers_reusser_d.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://edudoc.ch/record/86369/files/expertise_oelkers_reusser_d.pdf</a>)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Raduan, N. A., Na, S. I. (2020). An integrative review of the models for teacher expertise and career development. <em>European Journal of Teacher Education</em>, <em>43</em>(3), p. 428–451. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1728740" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1728740</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Reich, K. (1996). Systemisch-konstruktivistische Didaktik. Eine allgemeine Zielbestimmung. In Voß, R. (Ed.), <em>Die Schule neu erfinden</em> (p. 70–91). Luchterhand: München.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Roth, H. (1970). <em>Pädagogische Psychologie des Lehrens und Lernens</em>. Hogrefe: Göttingen
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Scheerens, J. (2007): Conceptual framework for the PISA 2009 context questionnaires and thematic reports. Paper for the PISA Governing Board, Oslo.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Scheerens, J. (2017): Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness. A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base. Springer: Dordrecht
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Scheerens, J., Blömeke, S. (2016): Integrating teacher education effectiveness research into educational effectiveness models. <em>Educational Research Review</em>, 18, p. 70–87. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.002</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Senden, B., Nilsen, T. &amp; Blömeke, S. (2021). Instructional Quality: A Review of Conceptualizations, Measurement Approaches, and Research Findings. In Blikstad-Balas, M., Klette, K. &amp; Tengberg, M. (Eds.), <em>Ways of Analyzing Teaching Quality. Potentials and Pitfalls.</em> (p. 140–166) Scandinavian University Press. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215045054-2021-05" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215045054-2021-05</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Shulman L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. <em>Educational Researcher</em>, 15(2), p. 4–14.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Smith Crocco, M, Livingston, E. (2017). Becoming an “Expert” Social Studies Teacher. What We Know about Teacher Education and Professional Development. In McGlinn Manfra, M., Mason Bolick, Ch. (Eds.), <em>The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research (p.360 – 384).</em> Wiley: Hoboken
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., &amp; Grant, L. W. (2011). What Makes Good Teachers Good? A Cross-Case Analysis of the Connection Between Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement. <em>Journal of Teacher Education</em>, <em>62</em>(4), p. 339–355. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Unwin, T. (1993). The Place of Geography, Routledge. <a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846132" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846132</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Welniak, C. (2017). Diagnostische Kompetenz und Schülerorientierung. In V. Reinhardt, V., Lange, D. (Eds.), <em>Basiswissen Politische Bildung Forschung, Planung und Methoden,</em> 2, Schneider: Hohengehren.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Willis, J. (2021). An Evolution of a Framework for TBLT: What Trainers and Teachers Need to Know to Help Learners Succeed in Task-Based Learning. In Sudharshana, N.P., Mukhopadhyay, L. (Eds), <em>Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment (p. 63–92).</em> Springer: Singapore. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_5</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Winkler, I. (2011). <em>Aufgabenpräferenzen für den Literaturunterricht. Eine Erhebung unter Deutschlehrkräften</em>. Springer: Wiesbaden.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ristal-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2616-7697
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 17
Published on: Apr 12, 2025
Published by: Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Typology,
social sciences,
tasks,
instructional preferences,
professionalization
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Curriculum and pedagogy,
Education, other

© 2025 Marco Rehm, Ekkehard A. Köhler, published by Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 8 (2025): Issue 1 (March 2025)