Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metacognitive Competences and Implicit Theories of Intelligence in Relation with School Achievement Cover

Metacognitive Competences and Implicit Theories of Intelligence in Relation with School Achievement

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. 1. Adamsone, I., Gudakovska, N., & Svence, G., (2020), Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: Review of two studies in Latvia, „Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century”, 14(1), 7-17
  2. 2. Akin, E.,(2016), Examining the relation between metacognitive understanding of what is listened to and metacognitive awareness levels of secondary school students, „Educational Research and Reviews”, 11(7), 390-401
  3. 3. Ames, C., (1992), Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate, in D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), „Student perceptions in the classroom”, 327-348, Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  4. 4. Ashdown, D. M., & Bernard, M. E., (2012), Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skills benefit the social-emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of young children?, „Early Childhood Education Journal”, 39(6), 397-405
  5. 5. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S., (2007), Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention, „Child Development”, 78(1), 246-263
  6. 6. Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I., (2020), Teachers matter for metacognition: Facilitating metacognition in the primary school through teacher-pupil interactions, „Thinking Skills and Creativity”, 38, 10071810.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718
  7. 7. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.), P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), „Handbook of child psychology 4th ed. Cognitive development”, 3 (77-166), New York: John Wiley & Sons
  8. 8. Cedeño, L.F., Martínez-Arias, R., & Bueno, J.A., (2016), Implications of Socioeconomic Status on Academic Competence: A Perspective for Teachers, „International Education Studies”, 9, 257-26710.5539/ies.v9n4p257
  9. 9. Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., & Kardash, C. M., (2020), A metacognitive retrieval practice intervention to improve undergraduates’ monitoring and control processes and use of performance feedback for classroom learning, „Journal of Educational Psychology”. Advanced online publication, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2124443276, link accessed on January 2021
  10. 10. Costa, A., & Faria, L., (2018), Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review, „Frontiers in Psychology”, vol. 9, Article 829, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829 /full, link accessed on January, 2021
  11. 11. Daher, W., Anabousy, A. & Jabarin, R., (2018), Metacognition, positioning and emotions in mathematical activities, „International Journal of Research in Education and Science”, 4(1), 292-303
  12. 12. Destin M, Hanselman P, Buontempo J, Tipton E, Yeager DS, (2019), Do Student Mindsets Differ by Socioeconomic Status and Explain Disparities in Academic Achievement in the United States?, „Advances in Developing Human Resources”, 5 (3), 1–1210.1177/2332858419857706
  13. 13. Dolean, D., Melby-Lervåg, M., Tincas, I., Damsa, C., & Lervåg, A., (2019), Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty, „Learning and Instruction”, 63, 101218, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475218308703, link accesed on December, 2020
  14. 14. Dupeyrat, C. & Mariné, C., (2005), Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, Vol. 30 (1), 43-59
  15. 15. Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S., (1983), Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (eds.), „Handbook of chid psychology”,Vol. IV. „Social and personality development”, 643-691, New York: Wiley
  16. 16. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L., (1988), A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, „Psychological Review”, 95(2), 256-273
  17. 17. Dweck, C.S., (2006), „Mindset. The New Psychology of Succes”, New York: Random House
  18. 18. Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y, (1995), Implicit Theories: Elaboration and Extension of the Model, „Psychological Inquiry”, 6, 322-33310.1207/s15327965pli0604_12
  19. 19. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T. & Rennie D.L, (1999), Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields, „British Journal of Clinical Psychology”, 38, 215-22910.1348/014466599162782
  20. 20. Flavell, J., (1979), Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry, „American Psychologist”, 34, 906-91110.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  21. 21. Hackman, D., Farah, M. & Meaney, M., (2010), Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research., „Nature Reviws Neuroscience”, 11, 651-65910.1038/nrn2897
  22. 22. Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S., (2016), What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure, „Psychological Science”, 27(6), 859-869
  23. 23. Hong, Y.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W., (1999), Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 77(3), 588-599
  24. 24. Jacobs, J., & Paris, S., (1987), Children’s metacognition about reading. Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. „Educational Psychologist”, 22, 255-278
  25. 25. Keus, K., & Haave, N. C., (2020), Using a learning philosophy assignment to capture students’ metacognition and achievement goals, „The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning”, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.815, link accesed on January, 2021
  26. 26. Khajehpour, M., & Ghazvini, S. D., (2011), The role of parental involvement affect in children’s academic performance, „Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 15, 1204-120810.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.263
  27. 27. OECD, (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris
  28. 28. OECD, (2020), Students’ self-efficacy and fear of failure, in PISA 2018 Results 3, What School Life Means for Students’ Lives (40-42), OECD Publishing, Paris
  29. 29. Oyserman, D.& Lewis, N.A., Jr., (2017), Seeing the Destination AND the Path: Using Identity-Based Motivation to Understand and Reduce Racial Disparities in Academic Achievement, „Social Issues and Policy Review”, vol. 11, 159-194
  30. 30. Padmanabha, C. H., (2020), Metacognition: Conceptual Framework, „Journal on Educational Psychology”, 14(1), 1-11
  31. 31. Park, D., Kim S., (2015), Time to Move On? When Entity Theorists Perform Better Than Incremental Theorists, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 41(5),736-748
  32. 32. Pintrich, P., (2002), The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing, „Theory Into Practice”, 4(4), 219-225
  33. 33. Rahman, F., Jumani, N.B., Chaudry, M.A., Chisti, S.U., & Abbasi, F., (2010), Impact Of Metacognitive Awareness On Performance Of Students In Chemistry, „Contemporary Issues in Education Research”, vol. 3, 39-44
  34. 34. Rhodes, M. G., (2019), Metacognition, „Teaching of Psychology”, 46(2), 168-175
  35. 35. Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J., (2014), Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories, „Emotion”, 14(2), 227-234
  36. 36. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K., (2002), The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents, in T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), „Applied metacognition”, 224-257, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511489976.011
  37. 37. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K., (2008), Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & B. Bjork (Eds.), „A handbook of memory and metacognition”, 391-409, Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum
  38. 38. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S., (1994), Assessing metacognitive awareness, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, 19(4), 460-475
  39. 39. Schraw, G., (1998), Promoting general metacognitive awareness, „Instructional Science”, 26, 113-12510.1023/A:1003044231033
  40. 40. Seo, E., Lee, H. Y., Jamieson, J. P., Reis, H. T., Beevers, C. G., & Yeager, D. S., (2019), Trait attributions and threat appraisals explain the relation between implicit theories of personality and internalizing symptoms during adolescence, „Development and Psychopathology”, 33(2), 1-11
  41. 41. Soto, C., Blume, A., Bernal, M. & Castro, M., (2020), The Role of Metacognitive Cues on the Comprehension of Proficient and Poor Readers, „Journal of Research in Reading”, 43, 272-28910.1111/1467-9817.12303
  42. 42. Soto, C., Blume, A.P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., & Kruk, R., (2019), Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills, „Cogent Education”, 6, 1565067, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067, link accesed on January, 2021
  43. 43. Tanner K. D., (2012), Promoting student metacognition, „CBE life sciences education”, 11(2), 113-12010.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
  44. 44. Thenmozhi, C., (2019), Models of metacognition, „Shanlax International Journal of Education”, 7(2), 1-4
  45. 45. Wang, Y., Wu, C.- H., Parker, S.K. & Griffin, M.A., (2018), Developing goal orientations conducive to learning and performance: An intervention study, „Journal of Occupational Organizational Psychology”, 91, 875-89510.1111/joop.12227
  46. 46. Yeager, D. S. & Dweck, C., S., (2012), Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed, „Educational Psychologist”, 47 (4), 302-31410.1080/00461520.2012.722805
  47. 47. Young, A. E., & Worrell, F. C., (2018), Comparing metacognition assessments of mathematics, academically talented students, „Gifted Child Quarterly”, 62(3), 259-275.
Language: English
Page range: 301 - 309
Published on: Jun 24, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Adina-Petronela Vechiu, Nicoleta Laura Popa, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.