Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Universal Design for Learning in Forest Education: A Conceptual Analysis Cover

Universal Design for Learning in Forest Education: A Conceptual Analysis

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56.
  2. CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning (UDL) guidelines version 2.0. Author.
  3. CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Author.
  4. Capp, M.J. (2017). The effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807.
  5. Catama, B.V. (2025). Universal Design for Learning in action: Exploring strategies, outcomes, and challenges in inclusive education. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education, 5(2).
  6. Chamblin, M. (2017). Using the ADAPT strategy to facilitate the thinking process of creating universal design-based instructional adaptations and differentiation in lesson plans for diverse learners. Open Access Library Journal, 4, 1–17.
  7. Cree, J., & McCree, M. (2012). A brief history of the roots of Forest School in the UK. Horizons, 60(Winter). Institute for Outdoor Learning. https://outdoor-learning-research.org/Portals/0/Research%20Documents/Horizons%20Archive/H60.History.of.FS.pt1.pdf
  8. Dabaja, Z.F. (2022). The Forest School impact on children: Reviewing two decades of research. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 50(5). https://educartenatureza.uab.pt/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2023/06/The-Forest-School-impact-on-children-reviewing-two-decades-of-research.pdf
  9. Edyburn, D.L. (2010). Would you recognise Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41.
  10. Forest School Association. (2002). History of Forest School. https://forestschoolassociation.org/history-of-forest-school
  11. Isaacs, S. (1929). The nursery years: The mind of the child from birth to six years. Routledge & Kegan Paul. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.221617
  12. Israel, M., Ribuffo, C., & Smith, S.J. (2014). Universal Design for Learning innovation configuration: Recommendations for preservice teacher preparation and inservice professional development. CEEDAR Center, University of Florida. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296486155
  13. King-Sears, M.E. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 69–80.
  14. Knight, S. (2013). Forest School and outdoor learning in the early years. SAGE.
  15. Leather, M.F. (2018). A critique of Forest School: Something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(2), 5–18.
  16. Murray, R., & O’Brien, L. (2005). Such enthusiasm – a joy to see: An evaluation of Forest School in England. Forestry Commission. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/02/forest-schoolenglandreport.pdf
  17. Perkowska, M., & Bajkowski, T. (2022). Projektowanie uniwersalne w przestrzeni uniwersyteckiej – idee, możliwości, dobre praktyki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
  18. Rose, D.H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 110
Published on: Dec 12, 2025
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Urszula Namiotko, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.