Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stance-taking in Spanish-speaking Preschoolers’ Argumentative Interaction Cover

Stance-taking in Spanish-speaking Preschoolers’ Argumentative Interaction

Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. Berman, R. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route to language acquisition. In R. Berman (Ed.), <em>Language development across childhood and adolescence</em> (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.3.05ber" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/tilar.3.05ber</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  2. Blum-Kulka, S., &amp; Snow, C. (2004). Introduction: The potential of peer-talk. <em>Discourse Studies</em>, <em>6</em>(3), 291–306.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604044290" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1461445604044290</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  3. Blum-Kulka, S., Huck-Taglicht, D., &amp; Avni, H. (2004). The social and discursive spectrum of peer talk. <em>Discourse Studies</em>, <em>6</em>(3), 307–328.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604044291" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1461445604044291</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  4. Blum-Kulka, S., Hamo, M., &amp; Habib, T. (2010). Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function, thematic scope, and contribution to the development of discursive skills. <em>First Language</em>, <em>30</em>(3–4), 440–460.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710370528" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0142723710370528</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  5. Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., &amp; Haynes, O. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: stability and gender considerations. <em>First Language</em>, <em>24</em>, 267–304.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723704045681" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0142723704045681</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  6. Bova, A., &amp; Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. <em>Discourse Studies</em>, <em>15</em>(6), 713-734.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613490013" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1461445613490013</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  7. Brown, P., &amp; Levinson, S. (1987). <em>Politeness: Some universals in language usage</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511813085</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  8. Burdelski, M. (2010). Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment in a Japanese preschool. <em>Journal of Pragmatics</em>, 42, 1606–1621.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  9. Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing, (pp. 261–272). In W. Chafe and J. Nichols (Eds.), <em>Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology</em>. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  10. Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S., &amp; Farrell, A. (2009). Young children as rule markers. <em>Journal of Pragmatics</em>, <em>41</em>, 1477–1492.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  11. Dersley, I., &amp; Wootton, A. J. (2000). Observations about complaint sequences within antagonistic arguments. <em>Research on Language and Social Interaction</em>, <em>33</em>, 375–406.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  12. Dersley, I., &amp; Wootton, A. J (2001). In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk. <em>Language in Society</em>, <em>30</em>, 611–638.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501004043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0047404501004043</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  13. Du Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.). <em>Stancetaking in discourse</em> (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/pbns.164.07du</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  14. Dunn, J., &amp; Munn, P. (1987). Development of justification in disputes with mother and siblings. <em>Developmental Psychology</em>, <em>23</em>(6), 791–798.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.791" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.791</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  15. Eisenberg, A. (1987). Learning to argue with parents and peers. <em>Argumentation</em>, <em>1</em>(2), 113–125.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182256" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/BF00182256</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  16. Eisenberg, A. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their young children. <em>Merrill-Palmer Quarterly</em>, <em>38</em>(1), 21–43.
  17. Eisenberg, A., &amp; Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. <em>Discourse Processes</em>, <em>4</em>, 149–170.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544512" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01638538109544512</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  18. Goetz, P. J. (2010). The development of verbal justifications in the conversations of preschool children and adults. <em>First Language</em>, <em>30</em>(3-4), 403–420.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710370522" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0142723710370522</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  19. Goetz, P. J., &amp; Shatz, M. (1999). When and how peers give reasons: justifications in the talk of middle-school children. <em>Journal of Child Language</em>, <em>26</em>, 721–48.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999003980" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0305000999003980</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  20. Goffman, E. (1967). <em>Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior</em>. Garden City: Doubleday.
  21. Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. <em>Text &amp; Talk</em>, <em>26</em>(4-5), 443–461.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.018" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/TEXT.2006.018</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  22. Goodwin, C., &amp; Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Interstitial argument. In A. Grimshaw (Ed.), <em>Conflict talk</em> (pp. 85–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Goodwin, M. H., &amp; Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. U. Philips, S. Steele, &amp; C. Tanz (Eds.), <em>Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language. Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective</em> (pp. 200–248). New York: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  24. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., &amp; Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</em>, <em>33</em>, 61–135.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0140525X0999152X</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  25. Heritage, J. (1984). <em>Garfinkel and ethnomethodology</em>. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Heritage, J., &amp; Sorjonen, M. L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. <em>Language in Society</em>, <em>23</em>, 1–29.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0047404500017656</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  27. Köymen, B., Rosenbaum, L., &amp; Tomasello, M. (2014). Reasoning during joint decision-making by preschool peers. <em>Cognitive Development,</em> 32, 74–85.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.09.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.09.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  28. Köymen, B., Schmidt, M., Rost, L., Lieven, E., &amp; Tomasello, M. (2015). Teaching versus enforcing game rules in peer interactions. <em>Journal of Experimental Child Psychology</em>, <em>135</em>, 93–101.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.005</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  29. Küntay, A., Nakamura, K., &amp; Sen, B. A. (2014). Crosslinguistic and crosscultural approaches to pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), <em>Pragmatic development in first language acquisition</em>, (pp. 317–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.18kun" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/tilar.10.18kun</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  30. Kyratzis, A., Ross, T. S., &amp; Köymen, B. S. (2010). Validating justifications in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk: implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. <em>Journal of Child Language</em>, <em>37</em>(1), 115–144.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009069" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0305000908009069</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  31. Leitão. S. (2007). Argumentação e desenvolvimento do pensamento reflexivo. <em>Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica</em>, <em>20</em>(3), 454–462.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722007000300013" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1590/S0102-79722007000300013</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  32. Linell, P. (1998). <em>Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives</em>. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/impact.3</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  33. MacWhinney, B. (2000). <em>The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Volume I: Transcription format and programs</em>. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2000.26.4.657" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1162/coli.2000.26.4.657</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  34. Matsui, T. (2014). Children’s understanding of certainty and evidentiality. In D. Matthews (Ed.), <em>Pragmatic development in first language acquisition</em>, (pp. 295–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.17mat" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/tilar.10.17mat</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  35. Maynard, D. W. (1985). How children start arguments. <em>Language in Society</em>, <em>14</em>, 1–30.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010915" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0047404500010915</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  36. Migdalek, M. J., &amp; Rosemberg, C. R. (2013). Construcción multimodal de los argumentos de niños pequeños en disputas durante situaciones de juego. <em>Papeles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano</em>, <em>9</em>(4), 1–16.
  37. Migdalek, M.J, Rosemberg, C. R. &amp; Arrúe, J. E. (2015). Argumentación infantil en situaciones de juego: diferencias en función del contexto. <em>Propuesta Educativa</em>, <em>44</em>(2), 79–88.
  38. Migdalek, M. J., Rosemberg, C. R., &amp; Santibáñez Yáñez, C. (2014a). La génesis de la argumentación. Un estudio con niños de 3 a 5 años en distintos contextos de juego. <em>Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura</em>, <em>19</em>(3), 251–267.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v19n3a03" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.17533/udea.ikala.v19n3a03</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  39. Migdalek, M. J., Santibáñez Yáñez, C., &amp; Rosemberg, C. R. (2014b). Estrategias argumentativas en niños pequeños: Un estudio a partir de las disputas durante el juego en contextos escolares. <em>Revista Signos</em>, <em>47</em>(86), 435–462.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342014000300005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4067/S0718-09342014000300005</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  40. Nelson, K. (1996). <em>Language in cognitive development. The emergence of the mediated mind</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174619" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9781139174619</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  41. Nelson, K. (2007). <em>Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory</em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041400" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4159/9780674041400</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  42. Ninio, A., &amp; Snow, C. (1996). <em>Pragmatic development</em>. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  43. Ochs, E. (1986). Introduction. In B. B. Schieffelin, E. Ochs (Eds.), <em>Language socialization across cultures</em>, (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620898.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511620898.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  44. Peronard, M. (1991). Antecedentes ontogenéticos de la argumentación. In E. L. Traill (Eds.), <em>Scripta philologica: in honorem Juan M. Lope Blanch, 3</em> (pp. 417–443). México: UNAM.
  45. Phinney, J. S. (1986). The structure of 5-year-olds’ verbal quarrels with peers and siblings. <em>The Journal of Genetic Psychology</em>, <em>147</em>(1), 47–60.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1986.9914479" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00221325.1986.9914479</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  46. Rosemberg, C. R, Arrúe J. E., &amp; Alam, F. (2005-2012). Home language environments of 4-year old Argentinean children from different socio-cultural groups. Buenos Aires: CONICET.
  47. Rosemberg, C. R., Silva, M. L., &amp; Stein, A. (2011). Narrativas infantiles en contexto: un estudio en hogares de barrios urbano marginados de Buenos Aires. <em>Revista del Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación Universidad de Buenos Aires</em>, <em>28</em>, 135–154.
  48. Sacks, H., Schegloff. E. A., &amp; Jefferson G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. <em>Language</em>, <em>50</em>, 696–735<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1353/lan.1974.0010</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  49. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. <em>American Anthropologist</em>, <em>70</em>, 1075–1095.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  50. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), <em>Conversational organization and its development</em>, (pp.51–77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  51. Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. <em>Child Development</em>, <em>58</em>, 283–305.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1130507" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/1130507</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  52. Shiro, M. (2003). Genre and evaluation in narrative development. <em>Journal of Child Language</em>, <em>30</em>(1), 165–194.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005500" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0305000902005500</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  53. Shiro, M. (2004). Expressions of epistemic modality and construction of narrative stance in Venezuelan children’s narratives. <em>Psychology of Language and Communication</em>, <em>8</em>(2), 35–56.
  54. Shiro, M. (2007). <em>La construcción del punto de vista en los relatos orales de niños en edad escolar: un análisis discursivo de la modalidad</em>. Caracas: UCV.
  55. Shiro, M. (2008). Narrative stance in Venezuelan children’s stories. In A. McCabe, A. Imbaley, &amp; G. Melzi (Eds.), <em>Spanish language narration and literacy: Culture, cognition and emotion</em>, (pp. 213–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815669.012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511815669.012</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  56. Shiro, M. (2012). “Y entonces le dijo….“ Representación del habla en las narraciones orales de niños venezolanos. <em>Boletín de Lingüística</em>, <em>37-38</em>, 119–143.
  57. Sprott, R. A. (1992). On giving reasons in verbal disputes: The development of justifying. <em>Argumentation &amp; Advocacy</em>, <em>29</em>(2), 61–76.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1992.11951556" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00028533.1992.11951556</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  58. Stein, N., &amp; Albro, E. R. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. <em>Discourse Processes</em>, <em>32</em>(2-3), 113–133.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3202&amp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S15326950DP3202&amp</a>;3_02</dgdoi:pub-id>
  59. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). <em>The uses of argument</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511840005</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  60. Watts. R. (2003). <em>Politeness</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511615184</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  61. Zadunaisky Ehrlich, S., &amp; Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. <em>Discourse &amp; Society</em>, <em>21</em>(2), 211–233.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353847" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0957926509353847</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2019-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 184 - 211
Published on: Oct 5, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2019 Martha Shiro, Maia Migdalek, Celia Rosemberg, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.