Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrating X-ray fluorescence and X-ray computed tomography for comprehensive analysis of historical ceramics from the Kraków Upland Cover

Integrating X-ray fluorescence and X-ray computed tomography for comprehensive analysis of historical ceramics from the Kraków Upland

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Location of sampling sites. 1 – Grodzisko near Skała, 2 – Jerzmanowice, 3 – Ojców, a – source clay deposits.
Location of sampling sites. 1 – Grodzisko near Skała, 2 – Jerzmanowice, 3 – Ojców, a – source clay deposits.

Fig. 2.

The analyzed pottery fragments. (a) Photographic image of the fragment; refer to GRO_275, refer to JER_135, refer to OJC_273, refer to OJC_965, refer to OJC_9668. (b) Frontal cross-section of the tomographic reconstruction of the sample. (c) Longitudinal cross-section of the tomographic reconstruction of the sample.
The analyzed pottery fragments. (a) Photographic image of the fragment; refer to GRO_275, refer to JER_135, refer to OJC_273, refer to OJC_965, refer to OJC_9668. (b) Frontal cross-section of the tomographic reconstruction of the sample. (c) Longitudinal cross-section of the tomographic reconstruction of the sample.

Fig. 3.

(a) SiO2-Al2O3-CaO and (b) SiO2-Al2O3-Na2O+K2O ternary plots showing the matrix composition of the ceramic body of the analyzed sample measured by XRF technique.
(a) SiO2-Al2O3-CaO and (b) SiO2-Al2O3-Na2O+K2O ternary plots showing the matrix composition of the ceramic body of the analyzed sample measured by XRF technique.

Fig. 4.

Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample GRO_275 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample GRO_275 (in mm).

Fig. 5.

Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample JER_135 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample JER_135 (in mm).

Fig. 6.

Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample OJC_965 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample OJC_965 (in mm).

Fig. 7.

Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample OJC_9668 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the inclusions of sample OJC_9668 (in mm).

Fig. 8.

Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample GRO_275 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample GRO_275 (in mm).

Fig. 9.

Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample JER_135 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample JER_135 (in mm).

Fig. 10.

Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_965 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_965 (in mm).

Fig. 11.

Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_9668 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_9668 (in mm).

Fig. 12.

Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_273 (in mm).
Segmented image emphasizing the voids of sample OJC_273 (in mm).

Elemental composition of the matrix of the ceramic body of the analyzed pottery samples and clay deposits in the Kraków Upland (in wt%, μg/g, and standard deviation) determined by XRF technique

ElementsClay depositsGRO_275JER_135OJC_273OJC_965OJC_9668
Determined concentration ± St.Dev. (%)

Na0.055 ± 0.0079<LOD0.15 ± 0.211.19 ± 0.910.198 ± 0.0730.36 ± 0.13
Mg0.320 ± 0.0720.17 ± 0.210.76 ± 0.0740.59 ± 0.251.08 ± 0.380.84 ± 0.19
Al3.9 ± 2.03.0 ± 2.211.6 ± 3.36.1 ± 2.63.9 ± 3.78.50 ± 0.98
Si11.8 ± 5.242.3 ± 3.231.2 ± 1.928.7 ± 2.928 ± 1831.2 ± 2.2
P0.039 ± 0.0240.106 ± 0.0120.091 ± 0.0990.25 ± 0.192.8 ± 2.70.18 ± 0.035
S0.016 ± 0.00790.030 ± 0.0120.097 ± 0.0340.56 ± 0.180.12 ± 0.0720.063 ± 0.015
K1.03 ± 0.250.88 ± 0.621.93 ± 0.483.2 ± 0.172.3 ± 2.23.3 ± 1.5
Ca1.42 ± 0.320.35 ± 0.311.04 ± 0.358 ± 814 ± 61.78 ± 0.32
Ti0.180 ± 0.0870.087 ± 0.0850.69 ± 0.320.57 ± 0.120.25 ± 0.230.78 ± 0.59
Fe2.23 ± 0.390.94 ± 0.783.05 ± 0.914.6 ± 1.42.5 ± 2.14.64 ± 0.59

Determined concentration ± St.Dev. (μg/g)

V39 ± 12210 ± 150236 ± 46140 ± 13035 ± 31121 ± 67
Cr48 ± 1194 ± 110148 ± 18100 ± 2662 ± 17180 ± 94
Mn180 ± 19560 ± 150360 ± 3001600 ± 3801610 ± 700820 ± 150
Ni23 ± 6208 ± 5433 ± 1351 ± 3565 ± 5668 ± 5
Cu15 ± 422 ± 955 ± 19369 ± 1858 ± 1547 ± 34
Zn82 ± 64<LOD318 ± 60229 ± 34330 ± 24 030256 ± 22
Ga12 ± 4<LOD33 ± 16147 ± 6739 ± 2934 ± 8
As17 ± 5120 ± 110<LOD<LOD115 ± 1935 ± 13
Rb64 ± 1073 ± 32126 ± 40184 ± 58143 ± 18165 ± 15
Sr42 ± 890 ± 2087 ± 49160 ± 21390 ± 120143 ± 15
Y34 ± 734 ± 4416 ± 7167 ± 7111 ± 634 ± 10
Zr84 ± 45270 ± 120235 ± 79269 ± 68104 ± 12411 ± 340
Nb22 ± 539 ± 563 ± 745 ± 1542 ± 1694 ± 40
Ba187 ± 32<LOD650 ± 480840 ± 3501580 ± 2001130 ± 530

The comparison of determined and known (reference) concentrations of chemical compounds in reference samples

CompoundReference AReference C

Concentration (wt%)Concentration (wt%)

ReferenceDetermined ± St.Dev.ReferenceDetermined ± St.Dev.
Na2O1.621.740 ± 0.0131.882.440 ± 0.080
MgO0.270.150 ± 0.0400.30.337 ± 0.040
Al2O334.1635.43 ± 0.3224.827.47 ± 0.27
SiO259.9755.20 ± 0.3369.5763.66 ± 0.38
K2O3.334.41 ± 0.132.934.119 ± 0.055
CaO0.530.52 ± 0.110.520.535 ± 0.012
Fe2O3nd1.35 ± 0.410.30.3800 ± 0.0023
BaO0.120.130 ± 0.021nd0.157 ± 0.012

The correlation data of the ceramic sample according to the data from XRF analysis

Na2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3K2OCaOTiO2Fe2O3VCr2O3MnONiOCuZnOGaAsRbSrOY2O3ZrNbBaOPb
Na2O1
MgO−0.031
Al2O300.321
SiO2−0.45−0.87−0.381
P2O5−0.20.67−0.45−0.451
SO30.97−0.04−0.04−0.46−0.121
K2O0.670.560.36−0.770.010.541
CaO0.260.63−0.43−0.650.90.350.281
TiO20.330.410.88−0.56−0.420.220.75−0.281
Fe2O30.690.440.53−0.71−0.220.560.970.080.871
V0.18−0.720.360.44−0.840.24−0.31−0.710.15−0.081
Cr2O3−0.060.060.79−0.03−0.66−0.230.4−0.70.830.550.271
MnO0.620.43−0.48−0.620.630.650.510.9−0.160.33−0.57−0.591
NiO−0.39−0.78−0.680.94−0.18−0.39−0.73−0.35−0.76−0.750.17−0.3−0.311
Cu0.98−0.08−0.04−0.43−0.1610.550.310.230.570.26−0.20.63−0.371
ZnO0.120.940.57−0.930.450.150.60.50.60.56−0.420.170.33−0.950.111
Ga0.980.110.06−0.59−0.070.990.660.390.340.680.14−0.150.68−0.520.990.291
As−0.58−0.15−0.820.490.56−0.54−0.610.28−0.88−0.79−0.49−0.610.10.72−0.55−0.45−0.61
Rb0.750.590.32−0.870.110.670.980.430.680.94−0.290.230.63−0.80.670.670.79−0.631
SrO−0.030.71−0.44−0.560.980.040.20.95−0.32−0.04−0.88−0.620.76−0.26−0.010.490.10.460.291
Y2O30.98−0.21−0.07−0.3−0.290.970.540.170.230.580.31−0.110.55−0.250.99−0.040.95−0.530.62−0.131
Zr0.18−0.320.360.25−0.78−0.040.38−0.720.560.490.30.83−0.420.090.03−0.280.01−0.420.19−0.680.191
Nb−0.210.660.52−0.440.08−0.380.59−0.060.670.55−0.510.69−0.12−0.48−0.370.57−0.22−0.230.430.14−0.360.441
BaO0.140.960.09−0.870.730.110.650.760.30.49−0.83−0.080.65−0.690.090.830.25−0.050.690.82−0.03−0.30.61
Pb−0.290.120.8−0.11−0.28−0.2−0.22−0.380.42−0.030.520.37−0.6−0.42−0.220.39−0.18−0.51−0.17−0.4−0.3−0.120.06−0.181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2025-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1508-5791 | Journal ISSN: 0029-5922
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 109
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2025
Published on: Oct 21, 2025
Published by: Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Romisaa Abdelrahman, Sebastian Wroński, Michał Wojenka, Jacek Tarasiuk, Lucyna Samek, published by Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.