Table 1.
Comparison of periods and their relative errors obtained from various methods.
| A | TRK | TFLP Err(%) | TkLP Err(%) | TMLP Err(%) | THPM1 Err(%) | THPM2 Err(%) | TMHPM Err(%) | THBM Err(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 | 6.2871 |
| 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
| 0.3 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 | 6.3187 |
| 0.0001 | 0.0003 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | ||
| 0.5 | 6.3828 | 6.3827 | 6.3826 | 6.3829 | 6.3826 | 6.3828 | 6.3828 | 6.3827 |
| 0.0004 | 0.0024 | 0.0012 | 0.0022 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0022 | ||
| 1.0 | 6.7000 | 6.6994 | 6.6975 | 6.7014 | 6.6961 | 6.6999 | 6.6999 | 6.6971 |
| 0.0085 | 0.0362 | 0.0206 | 0.0581 | 0.0018 | 0.0015 | 0.0429 | ||
| 1.4 | 7.1523 | 7.1493 | 7.1410 | 7.1583 | 7.1222 | 7.1504 | 7.1505 | 7.1372 |
| 0.0418 | 0.1588 | 0.0833 | 0.4202 | 0.0267 | 0.0249 | 0.2110 | ||
| 1.8 | 7.8582 | 7.8456 | 7.8173 | 7.8773 | 7.6987 | 7.8419 | 7.8424 | 7.7963 |
| 0.1592 | 0.5206 | 0.2441 | 2.0296 | 0.2075 | 0.2001 | 0.7869 | ||
| 2.0 | 8.3498 | 8.3249 | 8.2758 | 8.3820 | 8.0238 | 8.3083 | 8.3094 | 8.2303 |
| 0.2978 | 0.8853 | 0.3864 | 3.9041 | 0.4963 | 0.4832 | 1.4304 | ||
| 2.5 | 10.3232 | 10.1737 | 9.9878 | 10.4237 | 8.8029 | 9.9763 | 9.9805 | 9.7238 |
| 1.4480 | 3.2487 | 0.9735 | 14.726 | 3.3597 | 3.3193 | 5.8064 | ||
| 3.0 | 16.1555 | 14.2775 | 13.4646 | 15.7941 | 9.2483 | 12.7146 | 12.7271 | 12.0333 |
| 11.6246 | 16.6565 | 2.2371 | 42.7546 | 21.2986 | 21.2217 | 25.5159 |

Fig. 1.
Comparison of the relative error with respect to amplitude for the different methods.

Fig. 2.
The variation of k with respect to amplitude A in the second location point configuration.

Fig. 3.
Comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical solution for the three types of location points with A = 0.1.

Fig. 4.
Comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical solution for the three types of location points with A = 1.

Fig. 5.
Comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical solution for the three types of location points with A = 2.

Fig. 6.
Comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical solution for the three types of location points with A = 3.