Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of Automatic Correction of Systematic Effects in Measuring Chains Cover

Effectiveness of Automatic Correction of Systematic Effects in Measuring Chains

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. [1] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st edition. JCGM 100:2008.
  2. [2] Pavese, F. (2012). On the difference of meaning of ’zero correction’: zero value versus no correction, and of the associated uncertainties. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology IX. World Scientific, 297-309.10.1142/9789814397957_0037
  3. [3] Pavese, F. (2013). Why should correction values be better known than the measurand true value? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 459, 012036.10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012036
  4. [4] Pavese, F. (2012). Corrections and input quantities in measurement models. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 3, 155-159.10.1051/ijmqe/2012024
  5. [5] Danilov, A.A., Kurchenko, Yu. (2015). Calibration method of measuring instruments in operating conditions. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology X. World Scientific, 149-155.10.1142/9789814678629_0017
  6. [6] Krilov, A., Marinko, S, Boyko, L. (2015). Considerations on the influence of test equipment instability and calibration methods on measurement uncertainty of the test laboratory. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology X. World Scientific, 219-228.10.1142/9789814678629_0026
  7. [7] Pavese, F. (2018). On the classification into random and systematic effects. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing XI. World Scientific, 58-69.10.1142/9789813274303_0006
  8. [8] Keithley Instruments. Low Level Measurements Handbook - 7th Edition : Precision DC Current, Voltage and Resistance Measurements.
  9. [9] Meijer, G.C.M. (ed.) (2008). Smart Sensor Systems. John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9780470866931
  10. [10] Tuz, Ju.M. (1976). Structural Methods to Improve the Accuracy of Measuring Devices. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. (in Rusian)
  11. [11] Bromberg, E.M. (1978). Test Methods for Improving the Accuracy of Measurements. Moscow: Energia. (in Russian)
  12. [12] Wang, G., Meijer, G.C. (2000). Accurate DEM SC amplification of small differential-voltage with CM level from ground to VDD. In Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Electronics and MEMS. SPIE, Vol. 3990. DOI: 10.1117/12.388913.10.1117/12.388913
  13. [13] Keithley Instruments. (2008). Switching Handbook: A Guide to Signal Switching in Automated Test Systems, 6th Edition.
  14. [14] Dorozhovets, M. (2015). Uncertainty of correction of the systematic effects and drifts. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 11, 300-304. (in Polish)
  15. [15] Bayley, G.V., Hammersley, G.M. (1946). The “effective” number of independent observations in an autocorrelated time-series. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 8 (2), 184-197.10.2307/2983560
  16. [16] Zhang, N.F. (2006). Calculation of the uncertainty of the mean of autocorrelated measurements. Metrologia 43 (4), 276-281.10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S15
  17. [17] Warsza, Z., Dorozhovets, M. (2008). Uncertainty type A evaluation of autocorrelated measurement observations. Biuletyn WAT, LVII (2), 143-152.
  18. [18] National Instruments Corporation. NI 6250/6251/6254/6259 Multifunction 16 bit Data Acquisition. Datasheet. http://www.ni.com.
Language: English
Page range: 132 - 143
Submitted on: Mar 20, 2019
|
Accepted on: Jul 31, 2019
|
Published on: Aug 24, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2019 Mykhaylo Dorozhovets, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.