Fig. 1:

Fig. 2:

Fig. 3:

Fig. 4:

Fig. 5:

Fig. 6:

Fig. 7:

Fig. 8:

Fig. 9:

Fig. 10:

Fig. 11:

Fig. 12:

Fig. 13:

Description of general models calculated for the effect of interrow and fallow management on field bindweed abundance_
| Dependant variable/Factors | Wald χ2 | p | df | Pairwise comparison (LSD) of treatments (estimated marginal means) |
| Bindweed density according to classification scheme | ||||
| Green cover treatment | 16.48 | <0.001 | 3 | Vetch-rye (1.21)a, winter rape (1.27)ab, cereal straw (1.60)bc, natural green cover (1.90)c |
| Date of visual scoring | 14,20 | 0.003 | ||
| Dependant variable/Factors | Wald χ2 | p | df | Pairwise comparison (LSD) of treatments (estimated marginal means) |
| Bindweed density according to classification scheme | ||||
| Green cover treatment | 91.83 | <0.001 | 2 | Alfalfa (0.09)a, natural green cover mulched 1x per year (0.89)b, natural green cover, regularly muched (2.21)c |
| Date of visual scoring | 43.99 | <0.001 | 3 | |
Description of general models calculated for the under-vine experiments_
| Description of model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under-vine experiments | ||||
| Dependant variable/Factors | Wald χ2 | p | df | Pairwise comparison (LSD) of treatments (estimated marginal means) |
| Rate of total green cover (%) | ||||
| Treatment | 114.27 | <0.001 | 5 | Tourneso1a (25.19%), inter-vine bladeab (26.49%), Zassob (35.17%), Chem-synth.c (56.79%), Grasskillerc (58.33%), Controld (93.90%) |
| Vineyard | 36,84 | <0.001 | 1 | Vineyard 1a: (56.97%), vineyard 2b (34.05%) |
| Date of visual scoring | 19.94 | <0.001 | 4 | |
| Height of green cover (cm) | ||||
| Treatment | 166.58 | <0.001 | 5 | Tournesola (16.77cm), inter-vine bladea (18.93 cm), Grasskillera (19.32cm), Zassoa (20.41 cm), Chem-synth.b (28.67cm), Controlc (54.49 cm) |
| Vineyard | 16.02 | <0.001 | Vineyard 1a: (27.31cm), vineyard 2b (21.25 cm) | |
| Date of visual scoring | 2.40 | n.s. | ||
| Bindweed density according to classification scheme | ||||
| Treatment | 16.34 | 0.006 | 5 | Controla (0.82), Chem-synth.ab (0.98), Zassob (1.13), inter-vine bladebc (1.21), Grasskillerc (1.39), Tournesolc (1.32). |
| Vineyard | 131.60 | <0.001 | 1 | Vineyard 1a: (1.98), vineyard 2b (0.64) |
| Date of visual scoring | 75.34 | <0.001 | 4 | |
Treatment variants in the under-vine area
| Treatment | Manufacturer | Driving speed | Dates of application | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter-vine blade | Clemens, Wittlich, Germany | 2 km/h | Due to a technical default, only 2 applications, May 23, July 26 | |
| Tournesol: Undervine weeder | Pellenc, Santa Rosa, CA, USA | 2 km/h | May 02, June 02, July 25 | |
| Graskiller: High pressure water jet weeder | Grasskiller, Caffini, Verona, I | 2 km/h | April 20, June 06, July 19 | |
| Zasso XPS: High voltage electric weeder | Zasso XPS, Zug, CH | 2.5 km/h | April 28, June 13, July 24 | |
| Chemical synthetic control (usual farm practice) |
|
| Spraying device: Bauer, Obermarkersdorf Schrattenthal, A, Volume of spray liquid: 200 l/ha | |
| Untreated control | ||||
Treatment variants in the vineyard interrows
| Green cover management in interrows | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Green cover | Sowing/spreading date | Sowing rate/amount | Date of bending |
| Winter rape | November 2021 and 2022 | 15 kg/ha | Beginning of June 2022 and 2023. |
| Winter vetch/winter rye | November 2021 and 2022 | 100 kg/ha rye, + 20 kg/ha winter vetch | Beginning of June 2022 and 2023. |
| Cereal straw |
| 22 t/ha | |