Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of main directions within the tree canopy on fruit quality parameters in apricot cv. “Şalak” (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cover

Effects of main directions within the tree canopy on fruit quality parameters in apricot cv. “Şalak” (Prunus armeniaca L.)

Open Access
|Jan 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1:

Fruit of “Şalak” apricot variety (Doğru Çokran, 2020)

Fig. 2:

Illustration of sampling area within tree canopy. N; north, W; west, S; south, E; east.

Fig. 3:

Weather conditions: (a) monthly relative humidity, (b) monthly temperature, and (c) monthly precipitation, in the study years (2021 and 2022)

Tab. 1:

Average of fruit size (dimension), geometric mean diameter, sphericity and flesh thickness (2021–2022)

DirectionsYearsFruit width (mm)Fruit length (mm)Fruit thickness (mm)Geometric mean diameter (mm)SphericityFlesh thickness (mm)
East44.25 ab52.80 b42.29 a46.22 ab0.88 a12.60 b
West43.97 b52.66 b41.94 a45.94 b0.87 a12.48 b
North43.70 b52.39 b41.94 a45.78 b0.87 a12.48 b
South44.68 a53.49 a42.56 a46.66 a0.87 a12.94 a
202143.14 b52.46 b40.35 b45.02 b0.86 b12.92 a
202245.16 a53.21 a44.02 a47.28 a0.89 a12.33 a
F Value
Directions4.35**4.36**2.36ns4.31**0.56ns6.43***
Years100.83***11.10***356.49***147.21***236.90***47.18***
Directions x Years0.065ns0.185ns0.714ns0.962ns4.17**0.43ns

1 Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different values according to Fisher’s LSD test (p ≤ 0.05),

1** significant at p < 0.01,

1*** significant at p < 0.001, ns: not significant.

Tab. 2:

Average of fruit and stone weight, flesh/stone ratio and fruit firmness (2021-2022)

DirectionsYearsFruit weight (g)Stone weight (g)Flesh/stone ratio (%)Fruit firmness (kg/cm2)
East53.59 b1.90 a96.43 a4.78 c
West52.88 b1.95 a96.27 b5.30 b
North51.92 b1.96 a96.21 b5.79 a
South55.43 a1.96 a96.41 a4.16 d
202143.36 b1.62 b96.60 a5.60 a
202258.55 a2.27 a96.07 b4.42 b
F Value
Directions5.33***2.14ns4.56***36.48***
Years250.84***905.57***106.65***103.10***
Directions x Years0.40ns0.52ns1.01ns12.76***

1 Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different values according to Fisher’s LSD test (p ≤ 0.05),

1*** significant at p < 0.001, ns: not significant.

Fig. 4:

Interaction of directions x years for fruit sphericity (a) and fruit firmness (b). Different letters in the related visuals indicate significant differences according to the LSD test (p≤0.05).

Tab. 3:

Average of fruit colour parameters according to CIE L* a*b* (2021-2022)

DirectionsYearsL*a*b*Hue°Chroma
East81.57 a5.45 a46.47 a82.83 c47.02 a
West80.91 a2.63 c43.26 a84.74 ab43.53 a
North81.07 a3.54 bc46.88 a85.31 a47.20 a
South78.36 b4.16 b44.09 a83.81 bc44.47 a
202183.21 a2.39 b40.92 a85.63 a41.05 b
202277.74 b5.50 a49.43 b82.71 b50.06 a
F Value
Directions3.54**12.37***2.13ns7.52***2.30ns
Years50.93***85.96***48.91***54.08***55.34***
Directions x Years3.61**6.85***2.62*4.78***2.42ns

1 Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different values according to Fisher’s LSD test (p ≤ 0.05),

1** significant at p < 0.01,

1*** significant at p < 0.001, ns: not significant.

Fig. 5:

Interaction of directions x years for L* (a), a* (b), b* (c) and hue angle value (d). Different letters in the related visuals indicate significant differences according to the LSD test (p≤0.05).

Tab. 4:

Average of some chemical features in cv. “Şalak” fruit (2021-2022)

DirectionsYearsSoluble solid content (%)Titratable acidity (g 100 g-1)Ripening indexFruit juice pHAscorbic acid (mg 100 g-1)
East14.53 a0.85 b17.26 a4.37 a15.84 b
West13.10 c0.89 a15.03 c4.27 b16.97 a
North13.12 c0.83 bc16.08 b4.29 b16.25 ab
South13.97 b0.81 c17.80 a4.37 a14.88 c
202113.49 b0.89 a15.35 b4.18 b14.31 b
202213.87 a0.80 b17.76 a4.47 a17.66 a
F Value
Directions25.61***12.50***26.15***22.66***10.65***
Years7.44*129.36***102.80***680.72***156.14***
Directions x Years4.78**13.19***19.09***4.64***10.73***

1 Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different values according to Fisher’s LSD test (p ≤ 0.05),

1* significant at p < 0.05,

1** significant at p < 0.01,

1*** significant at p < 0.001, ns: not significant.

Fig. 6:

Interaction of directions x years for soluble solid content (a), acidity (b), ripening index (c), pH (d) and ascorbic acid (e). Different letters in the related visuals indicate significant differences according to the LSD test (p≤0.05).

Fig. 7:

Pearson’s rank correlation among 20 studied variables. W; fruit width, L; fruit length, T; fruit thickness, Dg; geometric mean diameter, S; sphericity, FT; flesh thickness, FW; fruit weight, SW; stone weight, F/S; flesh/stone ratio, FF; fruit firmness, SSC; soluble solid content, TA; titratable acidity, RI; ripening index, AA; ascorbic acid, H; hue°, C; chroma

Fig. 8:

PCA analysis and biplot design illustration for relation direction, years and 20 studied traits. W; fruit width, L; fruit length, T; fruit thickness, Dg; geometric mean diameter, S; sphericity, FT; flesh thickness, FW; fruit weight, SW; stone weight, F/S; flesh/stone ratio, FF; fruit firmness, SSC; soluble solid content, TA; titratable acidity, RI; ripening index, AA; ascorbic acid, H; hue°, C; chroma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mittklbg-2024-0007 | Journal eISSN: 3061-063X (formerly 0007-5922) | Journal ISSN: 3061-0621
Language: English, German
Page range: 78 - 91
Submitted on: Jan 12, 2024
Published on: Jan 9, 2026
Published by: High School and Federal Office of Viticulture and Pomology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Cumali Gümüşel, Mücahit Pehluvan, Tuncay Kaya, Berna Doğru Çokran, published by High School and Federal Office of Viticulture and Pomology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.