Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bridging Academic Research and Application: Competency Asymmetries as a Barrier to Technology Transfer in Poland Cover

Bridging Academic Research and Application: Competency Asymmetries as a Barrier to Technology Transfer in Poland

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295
  2. Bojko, M. M., Knapińska, A., & Tomczyńska, A. (2021). Academic entrepreneurship and the research productivity in Poland. Industry and Innovation, 28(4), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1753020
  3. Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, Special Issue: 30 Years After Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship, 40(8), 1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
  4. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300
  5. D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
  6. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
  7. Draghi, M. (2024). The Draghi report on EU competitiveness. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/competitiveness/draghi-report_en
  8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  9. European Commission. (2022). European Innovation Scoreboard 2022. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/309907
  10. European Commission. (2025). European Innovation Scoreboard 2025. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/3239776
  11. Fini, R., Perkmann, M., & Ross, J.-M. (2022). Attention to Exploration: The Effect of Academic Entrepreneurship on the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Organization Science, 33(2), 688–715. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1455
  12. Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, 47, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
  13. Goel, R. K., & Göktepe-Hultén, D. (2018). What drives academic patentees to bypass TTOs? Evidence from a large public research organisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9595-7
  14. Gulbrandsen, M., & Thune, T. (2017). The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9556-1
  15. Krabel, S., Siegel, D., & Slavtchev, V. (2012). The internationalization of science and its influence on academic entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(2), 192–212.
  16. Kwiek, M. (2021). Poland: A Decade of Reforms (2010–2020). International Higher Education, (106), 36–38.
  17. Lerner, J., Manley, H., Stein, C., & Williams, H. (2024). The wandering scholars: Understanding the heterogeneity of university commercialization. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2024/program/paper/HR2dndFB
  18. Łaskowska, J., Zastempowski, M., & Kalocińska-Szumska, A. (2023). Commercialization of scientific research in Poland: Process or procedure? Organizational solutions in selected Polish and foreign universities. Torun International Studies, 1(17), 65–75.
  19. Łącka, I. (2020). Barriers to using of quintuple helix model to create innovations in Polish regions. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, (146), 233–251.
  20. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., & Gianiodis, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and University-Based Technology Transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
  21. Mascarenhas, C., Mendes, T., Galvăo, A. R., Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2024). Academic researchers’ motivations to engage in university–industry collaboration in cross-border regions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6), 2104–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10082-w
  22. Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.010
  23. OECD. (2019). University-Industry Collaboration: New Evidence and Policy Options. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9c1e648-en
  24. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  25. Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
  26. Portyanko, S., Reinmoeller, P., Hussels, S., & Turner, N. (2023). Peer effects and intentional entrepreneurial behaviour: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(3), 515–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12320
  27. Rasmussen, E., & Mosey, S. (2011). The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin-Off Venture Emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1314–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x
  28. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Research on the Human Connection in Technological Innovation, 21(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
  29. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
  30. Szarek, M., & Pachciarek, H. (2021). Organizational potential of universities for commercialization–the analysis of university management models in the scope of commercialization. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4467–4477.
  31. Tartari, V., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2014). In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy, 43(7), 1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003
  32. Taxt, R. E. (2024). Motivations for academic engagement and commercialisation: A case study of actors’ collaboration in third mission activities from three European universities. Industry and Higher Education, 38(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231176511
  33. van Burg, E., Du, J., & Kers, J. G. (2021). When do academics patent outside their university? An in-depth case study. Technovation, 107, 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102287
  34. Waligóra, A., & Górski, M. (2022). Reform of higher education governance structures in Poland. European Journal of Education, 57(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12491
  35. Werker, C., & Hopp, C. (2020). Balancing act between research and application: How research orientation and networks affect scholars’ academic and commercial output. Journal of Business Economics, 90(8), 1171–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00979-x
  36. Zastempowski, M., Kalocińska-Szumska, A., & Łaskowska, J. (2024). Roles in Research Teams: The Perspective of University Commercialisation. Management, (28)1, 106–137. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/186076
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2025-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 62
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2026
Published on: Jul 30, 2026
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Rafał Muda, Rafał Sławomir Flaga, Agnieszka Marta Flaga, Anna Kos, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.