Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mediating Role of Risk Acceptance in QRIS Adoption Among Microentrepreneurs: An ISO 31000 Risk Treatment Perspective Cover

Mediating Role of Risk Acceptance in QRIS Adoption Among Microentrepreneurs: An ISO 31000 Risk Treatment Perspective

By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Akomea-Frimpong, I., Jin, X., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2024). Mitigating financial risks in sustainable public–private partnership infrastructure projects: A quantitative analysis. Systems, 12(7), Article 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12070239
  2. Aljaradat, A., & Shukla, S. K. (2025). Trust and cybersecurity in digital payment adoption: Socioeconomic insights from India. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 5(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-04-2025-0119
  3. Ashmawi, K., Hadidi, L. A., Assaf, S., Tuffaha, F. M., & Al-Ofi, K. (2018). Risk assessment and allocation in the contract for public works used in Saudi Arabia construction industry. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), Article 1490148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1490148
  4. Balea-Stanciu, M.-R., Lazea, G.-I., & Bunget, O.-C. (2025). Human risk mitigators: A bibliometric and thematic analysis of financial advisors in household resilience. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100548
  5. Barraza de la Paz, J. V., Rodríguez-Picón, L. A., Morales-Rocha, V., & Torres-Argüelles, S. V. (2023). A systematic review of risk management methodologies for complex organizations in Industry 4.0 and 5.0. Systems, 11(5), Article 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11050218
  6. Becker, H. (2025). Comparison of the risk management systems ISO 31000:2018 and COSO ERM framework with regard to their ability to capture the error culture. In H. Becker (Ed.), Using artificial intelligence (AI) to minimize errors in business enterprise management (pp. 85–170). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47243-6_3
  7. Bland, E., Changchit, C., Changchit, C., Cutshall, R., & Pham, L. (2024). Investigating the components of perceived risk factors affecting mobile payment adoption. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(6), Article 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17060216
  8. Bouzguenda, M., & Jarboui, A. (2025). Navigating the green frontier: Dynamic risk and return transmission between clean energy ETFs and ESG indexes in emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100557
  9. Chen, Y., Kho, M. Y., & Mohamed, O. (2024). Developing a conceptual model for promoting risk management for public–private partnerships projects. Sustainability, 16(18), Article 8221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188221
  10. Čirjevskis, A. (2025). Exploring AI-ESG-driven synergies in M&A transactions: Open innovation and real options approaches. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100561
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  12. Díaz-Arancibia, J., Hochstetter-Diez, J., Bustamante-Mora, A., Sepúlveda-Cuevas, S., Albayay, I., & Arango-López, J. (2024). Navigating digital transformation and technology adoption: A literature review from small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 5946. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145946
  13. Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
  14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
  15. Feng, R. (2023). Economics of risk and insurance. In R. Feng (Ed.), Decentralized insurance: Technical foundation of business models (pp. 55–84). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29559-1_3
  16. Feng, R., & Liu, P. (2025). Spatio-temporal risk sharing and transfer: A unified theory of multi-period decentralized insurances and annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 92(3), 765–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70001
  17. Ferrara, M., Bertozzi, G., Di Fazio, N., Aquila, I., Di Fazio, A., Maiese, A., Volonnino, G., Frati, P., & La Russa, R. (2024). Risk management and patient safety in the artificial intelligence era: A systematic review. Healthcare, 12(5), Article 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12050549
  18. Franco, G., Lemke-Verderame, L., Guidotti, R., Yuan, Y., Bussi, G., Lohmann, D., & Bazzurro, P. (2024). Typology and design of parametric cat-in-a-box and cat-in-a-grid triggers for tropical cyclone risk transfer. Mathematics, 12(11), Article 1768. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12111768
  19. Gómez-Hurtado, C., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., Prados-Peña, M. B., & Ortíz-Zamora, A. F. (2025). Adoption of e-wallets: Trust and perceived risk in Generation Z in Colombia. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 29(4), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-01-2024-0017
  20. Government Regulation Number 7 Year 2021 regarding the ease, protection, and empowerment of cooperatives and micro, small, and medium enterprises. (2021).
  21. Habib, S., & Hamadneh, N. N. (2021). Impact of perceived risk on consumers technology acceptance in online grocery adoption amid COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(18), Article 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221
  22. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  23. Hall, B. H., & Khan, B. (2003). Adoption of new technology (NBER Working Paper No. 9730). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9730
  24. Hamzah Muchtar, E., Trianto, B., Maulana, I., Alim, M. N., Marasabessy, R. H., Hidayat, W., Junaedi, E., & Masrizal. (2024). Quick response code Indonesia standard (QRIS) e-payment adoption: Customers perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2316044. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316044
  25. Hiebl, M. R. W. (2024). The integration of risk into management control systems: Towards a deeper understanding across multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Management Control, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00373-6
  26. Hosomi, S., & Ge, G. (2025). The impact of organizational capital on cost stickiness: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100559
  27. Hosseini Shekarabi, S. A., Kiani Mavi, R., & Romero Macau, F. (2025). Supply chain resilience: A critical review of risk mitigation, robust optimisation, and technological solutions and future research directions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 26(3), 681–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-025-00458-8
  28. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Risk management—Guidelines (ISO Standard No. 31000:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
  29. Jain, R., Kumar, S., Sood, K., Grima, S., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2023). A systematic literature review of the risk landscape in fintech. Risks, 11(2), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11020036
  30. Kiettikunwong, N., & Sangsarapun, W. (2025). G-token implications and risks for the financial system under state-issued digital instruments in Thailand. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100555
  31. Kumar, R., Singh, R., Kumar, K., Khan, S., & Corvello, V. (2023). How does perceived risk and trust affect mobile banking adoption? Empirical evidence from India. Sustainability, 15(5), Article 4053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054053
  32. Kurniawan, H. (2025, November 2). Generasi muda motor utama adopsi QRIS. Investor Daily. https://investor.id/finance/415833/generasi-muda-motor-utama-adopsiqris
  33. Lachowicz, M. J., Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2018). A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000165
  34. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2008 concerning micro, small, and medium enterprises. (2008).
  35. Leng, A., Xing, G., & Fan, W. (2017). Credit risk transfer in SME loan guarantee networks. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 30(5), 1084–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-5211-z
  36. Li, W. (2025). A study on factors influencing designers’ behavioral intention in using AI-generated content for assisted design: Perceived anxiety, perceived risk, and UTAUT. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2310354
  37. Ludvigsen, J. A. L., & Parnell, D. (2023). Redesigning the games? The 2020 Olympic Games, playbooks and new sports event risk management tools. Managing Sport and Leisure, 28(4), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.1928538
  38. Makajić-Nikolić, D. (2020). ISO 31000: Risk management guidelines. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 1–4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_314-1
  39. Manippi, W. A., Amri, A., & Kasih, E. C. (2025). The impact of using the quick response code Indonesian standard (QRIS) on the income of micro small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Pangkep District. In M. Nohong, F. R. Cahaya, P. M. Tuan, A. Mannan, A. I. Anwar, R. R. H. Thaha, R. N. P. Nugraha, A. T. Harahap, M. T. Dharsana, & F. I. Hermansyah (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Accounting, Management, and Economics 2024 (ICAME 2024) (Vol. 331, pp. 1339–1359). Atlantis Press International. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-758-8_108
  40. Marhavilas, P. K., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2021). Risk-acceptance criteria in occupational health and safety risk-assessment—The state of the art through a systematic literature review. Safety, 7(4), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7040077
  41. Mitchell, V. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229
  42. Nabila, A. P., Raharso, S., & Tiorida, E. (2025). The influence of trust and transaction security on interest in using the QRIS payment system: Study: QRIS users in Bandung City. Airlangga Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.20473/ajim.v6i2.72597
  43. Osei-Kyei, R., Narbaev, T., & Ampratwum, G. (2022). A scientometric analysis of studies on risk management in construction projects. Buildings, 12(9), Article 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091342
  44. Pandey, V., & Kushwaha, G. S. (2025). From risk minimisation to trust building: An empirical study on blockchain technology in digital payment system. Journal of Modelling in Management, 20(4), 1351–1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2024-0080
  45. Panos, G. A., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2020). Financial literacy and responsible finance in the FinTech era: Capabilities and challenges. The European Journal of Finance, 26(4–5), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1717569
  46. Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
  47. Rezvani, S. M., Falcão, M. J., Komljenovic, D., & de Almeida, N. M. (2023). A systematic literature review on urban resilience enabled with asset and disaster risk management approaches and GIS-based decision support tools. Applied Sciences, 13(4), Article 2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042223
  48. Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297103500110
  49. Ruberti, M., & Calciolari, S. (2025). Environmental certifications as strategic assets? Evidence from Italian chemical and pharmaceutical firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), Article 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100562
  50. Sapountzaki, K. (2022). Risk mitigation, vulnerability management, and resilience under disasters. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063589
  51. Second amendment to Regulation of Members of the Board of Governors Number 21/18/PADG/2019 regarding implementation of the National Quick Response Code Standard for Payments. (2022).
  52. Sohn, S. (2024). Consumer perceived risk of using autonomous retail technology. Journal of Business Research, 171, Article 114389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114389
  53. Taherdoost, H. (2021). A review on risk management in information systems: Risk policy, control and fraud detection. Electronics, 10(24), Article 3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10243065
  54. Timur, Y. P., Masrizal, & Trianto, B. (2025). Factors influencing adoption of e-payments by microenterprises’ owners in Indonesia. Journal of Modelling in Management, 20(6), 2054–2085. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-09-2024-0305
  55. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
  56. Xie, J., Ye, L., Huang, W., & Ye, M. (2021). Understanding FinTech platform adoption: Impacts of perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1893–1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050106
Language: English
Page range: 232 - 253
Submitted on: Mar 26, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 22, 2026
Published on: Sep 29, 2026
Published by: Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Adrianus TIRTA, Wurong SHIH, published by Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.