Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Cross-Cultural Study on Teachers’ Views on Using Plagiarism Detection Tools for Sustainable Education in the Czech and Turkish Contexts Cover

A Cross-Cultural Study on Teachers’ Views on Using Plagiarism Detection Tools for Sustainable Education in the Czech and Turkish Contexts

Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Ahmad, T. S. A. S., Abedin, N. F. Z., Ahmad, I., Paramasivam, S., & Mustapha, W. Z. W. (2022). Awareness and attitudes of undergraduate students towards plagiarism: Are there any differences between genders? Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18947
  2. Alharthi, M. (2020). Students’ attitudes toward the use of technology in online courses. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 3(1), 14–23.
  3. Arkan, K.S.S., & Görgülü, A. (2017). Plagiarism detection in the learning management system. Proceedings of the 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) (pp. 495–500).
  4. Awasthi, S. (2019). Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13622
  5. Awasthi, S. (2019). Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13622
  6. Barrett, R., & Malcolm, J. (2006). Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment process. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(1), 38–45.
  7. Bailey, J. (2020). 5 Ways COVID-19 is changing academic plagiarism. Plagiarism today. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2020/10/26/5-ways-covid-19-is-changing-academic-plagiarism/
  8. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  9. Chua, H. W., & Lin, C. Y. (2020). The effect of task-based language teaching in learning motivation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 2(1), 41–48.
  10. Clarke, O., Chan, W.Y.D., Bukuru, S., Logan, J., & Wong, R. (2023). Assessing knowledge of and attitudes towards plagiarism and the ability to recognize plagiaristic writing among university students in Rwanda. Higher Education, 85, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00830-y
  11. Ersan, C., & Uslu, B. (2020). Can plagiarism detected by software be prevented through education? An experimental study with preschool teacher candidates. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(2), 118–132.
  12. Ersoy, A., & Özden, M. (2011). Öğretmen Adaylarının Ödevlerinde İnternetten İntihal Yapmalarında Öğretim Elemanının Rolüne İlişkin Görüşleri [Preservice teachers‘ views on plagiarism from internet in their homework]. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 608–619.
  13. Farooq, R., & Sultana, A. (2022) Measuring students’ attitudes toward plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 32(3), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1860766
  14. Fraser, R. (2014). Collaboration, collusion, and plagiarism in computer science course work. Informatics in Education, 13(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.10
  15. Gunwoo, L., Jindae, K., Myung-seok, C., Rae-Young, J., & Ryong, L. (2023). Review of code similarity and plagiarism detection research studies, Applied Sciences, 13(20), 11358. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011358
  16. Halgamuge, M. N. (2017). The use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21842
  17. Jurgena, I., Cēdere, D., Keviša, I., Szerlag, Ó. A., & Jedrzejowska, A. (2021). Opinion of pre-service preschool teachers on responsiveness: A comparative study of Latvian and Polish students in the aspect of sustainable education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0013
  18. Kabadayi, A. (2010). Investigating demographic characteristics and teaching perceptions of Turkish preschool teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 180(6), 809–822.
  19. Karnalim, O., Chivers, S., & Chivers, W. (2023). Reporting less coincidental similarity to educate students about programming plagiarism and collusion. Computer Science Education, 34(3), 442–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2178063
  20. Keinonen, T., Åbo, M. S., Vilkonis, R., Persson, C., & Åbo, I. P. (2014). Environmental issues in the media- students’ perceptions in the three Nordic-Baltic countries. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0002
  21. Lancaster, T. & Culwin, F. (2004). Using freely available tools to produce a partially automated plagiarism detection process. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D.
  22. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 520529). Perth. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/lancaster.html
  23. Landau, J.D., Druen, P.B., & Arcuri, J.A. (2002). Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 29(2), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2902_06
  24. Lim, M. S., & Huh, S. (2019). Korean medical students’ knowledge about and attitudes towards plagiarism according to their commission of plagiarism. Science Editing, 6, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.170
  25. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  26. Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). Course curricular design and development of the M.Sc. programme in the field of ICT in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0007-7
  27. Marsh, R.L., Landau, J.D., & Hicks, J.L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 886–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.886
  28. Maslen, G. (2003, June 10). Dirty marks. The Bulletin, 18–22.
  29. McBurnie, C., Adam, T., Kaye, T., & Haßler, B. (2020). Zero-rating educational content in low- and middle-income countries (Helpdesk Response No. 8). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0004
  30. McCabe, D. 2001. While cheating helps some, it’s harder to stop others. Newsday, November 25.
  31. Mgeni, M. S., Ismail, M. J., Yunus, S. A., & Haji, H. A. (2019). The contribution of LMS to the learning environment: Views from the State University of Zanzibar. In G. Mendy, S. Ouya, I Dioum, & O., Thiaré (Eds), e-infrastructure and e-services for developing countries. AFRICOMM 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16042-5_27
  32. Mirķe, E., Cakula, S., & Tzivian, L. (2019). Measuring teachers-as-learners’ digital skills and readiness to study online for successful e-learning experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0013
  33. Miškolci, J., Armstrong, D., & Spandagou, I. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the relationship between inclusive education and distributed leadership in two primary schools in Slovakia and New South Wales (Australia). Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0014
  34. McLeod, S. A. (2019, July 30). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research. Simply Psychology. http://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html.
  35. Mtebe, J., & Gallagher, M. (2022). Continued usage intentions of digital technologies post-pandemic through the Expectation-Confirmation Model: The case of a Tanzanian university. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 18(1), 125–145.
  36. Nurmilaakso, M. (2015). How children can support their learning to write and read by computer in the early years of school. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2015-0008
  37. O’Connor, S. (2002, October 6). Electronic plagiarism and its impact on educational quality. CAVAL electronic plagiarism conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  38. Pipere, A., Kravale-Pauliņa, M., & Oļehnoviča, E. (2022). Present and future of teacher education admission: Perspectives from Europe. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0011
  39. Purg, P., & Zakrajsek, S. (2009). New technologies for sustainable teaching and learning: A case study from Slovenia on diminishing student workload and increasing motivation through ICT. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-009-0038-x
  40. Quah, C. H., Stewart, N., & Lee, J. W. C. (2012). Attitudes of business students toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9157-4
  41. Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether the text has been plagiarized? Psychological Record, 47, 113–122.
  42. Russell C. K., & Gregory D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 6(2), 36–40.
  43. Soobik, M. (2014). Teaching methods influencing the sustainability of the teaching process in technology education in general education schools. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0005
  44. Subaveerapandiyan, A., & Nandhakumar, R. (2023). Awareness of plagiarism among student teachers of Indian teacher educational institutions. Indian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 44–54. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4536909
  45. Tenner, E. (2005, June). Rise of the plagiosphere: How new tools to detect plagiarism could induce mass writer’s block. Technology Review, 50–53. https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472031955-ch4.pdf
  46. Vehviläinen, S., Löfström, E., & Nevgi, A. (2018). Dealing with plagiarism in the academic community: Emotional engagement and moral distress. Higher Education, 75, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0112-6
  47. Veisson, M., & Kabadayi, A. (2018). Exploring the preschool teachers‘ views on professionalism, quality of education and sustainability: International study in Estonia and Turkey. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0011
  48. Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902912994
  49. Whittle, S. R., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. G. (2008). Learning about plagiarism using Turnitin detection software. Medical Education, 42(5), 528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03058.x
  50. Yaşar, E. (2018). Akademik intihal, nedenleri ve çözüm önerileri [Academic plagiarism, reasons and suggestions for solutions]. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 1(1), 34–44.
  51. Zobel, J., & Hamilton, M. (2002). Managing student plagiarism in large academic departments. Australian Universities Review, 45(2), 23–30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2024-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 73
Published on: Jan 22, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Abdülkadir Kabadayı, Martin Skutil, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.