Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Environmental Education Open Inquiry Learning Kits on the Environmental Literacy of Pre-service Biology Teachers Cover

The Effect of Environmental Education Open Inquiry Learning Kits on the Environmental Literacy of Pre-service Biology Teachers

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Adler, I., Schwartz, L., Madjar, N., & Zion, M. (2018). Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education, 102(4), 820–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21445
  2. Adler, I., Zion, M., & Rimerman-Shmueli, E. (2019). Fostering teachers’ reflections on the dynamic characteristics of open inquiry through metacognitive prompts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 763–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1627060
  3. Alghamdi, A. K. H., & El-Hassan, W. S. (2020). Interdisciplinary inquiry-based teaching and learning of sustainability in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0020
  4. Amalia, A., & Saíadah, N. (2020). Dampak Wabah Covid-19 Terhadap Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Di Indonesia [The impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on teaching and learning activities in Indonesia]. Jurnal Psikologi, 13(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.35760/psi.2020.v13i2.3572
  5. Amirshokoohi, A. (2010). Elementary pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy and views toward Science, Technology, and Society (STS) issues. Science Educator, 19(1), 56–63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ874154
  6. Apriana, E. (2017). Pengaruh Program Perkuliahan Biologi Konservasi dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Aceh terhadap Peningkatan Literasi Lingkungan [The influence of the conservation biology lecture program with a contextual approach based on local wisdom of Aceh on increasing environmental literacy]. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 18(1), 59–67. http://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/serambi-ilmu/article/view/1032
  7. Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia [Systematic review: The impact of online lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic on Indonesian students]. PLACENTUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.20961/placentum.v8i2.43008
  8. Arnon, S., Orion, N., & Carmi, N. (2015). Environmental literacy components and their promotion by institutions of higher education: An Israeli case study. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.966656
  9. Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2213632
  10. Bissinger, K., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Environmental literacy in practice: Education on tropical rainforests and climate change. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(5), 2079–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9978-9
  11. Bjønness, B., & Kolstø, S. D. (2015). Scaffolding open inquiry: How a teacher provides students with structure and space. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.878
  12. Chacko, C. P. C. (2000). The nature and measurement of environmental literacy for sustainability (Dissertation, University of South Africa). University of South Africa, Pretoria. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43175641.pdf
  13. Cheng, I. N. Y., & So, W. W. M. (2015). Teachers’ environmental literacy and teaching – Stories of three Hong Kong primary school teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.967111
  14. Clair, R. st. (2003). Words for the world: Creating critical environmental literacy for adults. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(99), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.111
  15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th edition). Routledge.
  16. Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44. http://www.cyberbee.com/inquiryprimer.pdf
  17. Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. In The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation (Vol. 1). The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522820
  18. Dada, D. O., Eames, C., & Calder, N. (2017). Impact of environmental education on beginning preservice teachers’ environmental literacy. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.27
  19. Derman, A., Sahin, E., & Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Does outdoor education make any difference in environmental literacy of pre-service classroom teachers? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 8491–8506. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1118368.
  20. Dvoryatkina, S. N., Zhuk, L. V., Smirnov, E. I., Khizhnyak, A. V., & Shcherbatykh, S. V. (2021). Open innovation model of student’s research activities. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0018
  21. Echegoyen-Sanz, Y., & Martín-Ezpeleta, A. (2021). A holistic approach to education for sustainability: Ecofeminism as a tool to enhance sustainability attitudes in pre-service teachers. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0002
  22. Ekantini, A., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). The development of science student worksheet based on education for environmental sustainable development to enhance scientific literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060625
  23. Erol, H. (2021). Reflections on the 21st century skills into the curriculum of social studies course. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.2p.90
  24. Farwati, R., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., & Suhery, T. (2017). Potret Literasi Lingkungan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia di Universitas Sriwijaya [Portrait of environmental literacy of Chemistry teacher candidate students at Sriwijaya University]. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v1i1.376
  25. Gitomer, D. H., Martínez, J. F., Battey, D., & Hyland, N. E. (2021). Assessing the assessment: Evidence of reliability and validity in the edTPA. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219890608
  26. Goldman, D., Yavetz, B., & Peíer, S. (2006). Environmental literacy in teacher training in Israel: Environmental behavior of new students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.3-22
  27. Goulgouti, A., Plakitsi, A., & Stylos, G. (2019). Environmental literacy: Evaluating knowledge, affect, and behavior of pre-service teachers in Greece. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6287
  28. Grondlund, N. E. (1977). Constructing achievement tests (second edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  29. Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2019). Environmental literacy for all: Innovating environmental education for teacher education majors and non-education majors. In International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education (pp. 161–178). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25016-4_10
  30. Haerurahman, Moh., Rochman, C., & Nasrudin, D. (2017). Profil Literasi Lingkungan Hidup Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Fisika [Environmental literacy profile of physics education study program students]. Seminar Nasional Dan Aplikasinya, 17–21.
  31. Hariyadi, E., Maryani, E., & Kastolani, W. (2021). Analisis literasi lingkungan pada mahasiswa pendidikan geografi [Analysis of environmental literacy in geography education students]. Gulawentah: Jurnal Studi Sosial, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25273/gulawentah.v6i1.6685
  32. Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski J., T., McBeth C., W., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. In North American Association for Environmental Education. http://www.naaee.net
  33. Hsu, S.-J. (2004). The effects of an environmental education program on responsible environmental behavior and associated environmental literacy variables in Taiwanese college students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.35.2.37-48
  34. Irdalisa, I., Paidi, P., & Djukri, D. (2020). Implementation of technology-based guided inquiry to improve TPACK among prospective Biology teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1323a
  35. Jones, M. T., & Eick, C. J. (2007). Implementing inquiry kit curriculum: Obstacles, adaptations, and practical knowledge development in two middle school science teachers. Science Education, 91(3), 492–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20197
  36. Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
  37. Kapenieks, J., & Kapenieks, J. (2020). Spaced E-learning for sustainable education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0016
  38. Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2019). Developing teachers’ environmental literacy through inquiry-based practices. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103065
  39. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  40. Kuruppuarachchi, J., Sayakkarage, V., & Madurapperuma, B. (2021). Environmental literacy level comparison of undergraduates in the conventional and ODLs universities in Sri Lanka. Sustainability, 13(3), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031056
  41. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  42. Liang, S.-W., Fang, W.-T., Yeh, S.-C., Liu, S.-Y., Tsai, H.-M., Chou, J.-Y., & Ng, E. (2018). A nationwide survey evaluating the environmental literacy of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Sustainability, 10(6), 1730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061730
  43. Lloyd-Strovas, J., Moseley, C., & Arsuffi, T. (2018). Environmental literacy of undergraduate college students: Development of the environmental literacy instrument (ELI). School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12266
  44. Loubser, C. P., Swanepoel, C. H., & Chacko, C. P. C. (2001). Concept formulation for environmental literacy. South African Journal of Education, 21(4). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/24922
  45. Maknun, J., Barliana, M. S., & Cahyani, D. (2017). The level of environmental literacy toward vocational high school students in West Java province. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i2.6205
  46. Mashfufah, A., Nurkamto, J., Sajidan, & Wiranto. (2018). Environmental literacy among biology pre-service teachers: A pilot study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014 (September), 020040. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054444
  47. Meilinda, H., Prayitno, B. A., & Karyanto, P. (2017). Student’s environmental literacy profile of Adiwiyata Green School in Surakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.11591/EDULEARN.V11I3.6433
  48. Moseley, C. (2000). Teaching for environmental literacy. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(1), 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2000.11478633
  49. National Science Foundation. (2001). Foundations: A monograph for professionals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education: Inquiry – Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5 Classroom. Virginia: Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zzsWHQAACAAJ
  50. NEEF. (2015). Environmental literacy in the United States: An agenda for leadership in the 21st century. https://blueskyfundersforum.org/sites/blueskyfundersforum.org/files/resource/attachment/10/NEEFEnvironmentalLiteracyReport072015.pdf
  51. Nismalasari, Santiani, & Rohmadi, M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis [Application of the learning cycle learning model to science process skills and student learning outcomes on the subject of harmonic vibration]. Edusains, 4(2), 83.
  52. Ogunyemi, B., Ifegbesan, A., Benedict, H. T., Ogunsanya, A. O., Iyunade, O. T., Olubela, A., Ö Edewor, K. (2022). Knowledge, perceptions and readiness of Nigeria’s beginning teachers for sustainability education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0024
  53. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. P21 Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21), 2. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf
  54. Peregrym, M., Turisová, I., Tashev, A., Kónya, E. P., Matsai, N., & Havryliuk, Y. (2022). Using citizen science tools for distance field study of botanical cycle disciplines in times of pandemic and beyond. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0014
  55. Prawestri, S., Nyeneng, I., & Abdurrahman, A. (2016). Pengembangan Sintaks Model Pembelajaran Fisika berbasis Inkuiri dalam Melatih Kemampuan Ilmiah [Development of inquiry-based Physics learning model syntax in training scientific ability]. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, 4(1), 21–30. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4682
  56. Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990’s. Columbus OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. 51.
  57. Sachi, T., Ryuich, W., Hideaki, S., Hiroyuki, M., Masaki, N., & Kimihiro, M. (2022). Development of an educational program and rubric for environmental education in pre-service teacher training: A case study in Japan. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, (16), 320–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.50928/0002000835
  58. Saiful, J. A., & Setyorini, A. (2022). Ecocriticism course: Development of English pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0013
  59. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., Butlere, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). More personal knowledge for more sustainable higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0011
  60. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2020). Does the JTES help us create deeper personal meanings for sustainable education? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0012
  61. Saribas, D., Teksoz, G., & Ertepinar, H. (2014). The relationship between environmental literacy and self-efficacy beliefs toward environmental education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3664–3668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.820
  62. Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? In Education Research and Foresight (No. ED.2015/WS/23). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242996
  63. Subkoviak, M. J. (1988). A practitioner’s guide to computation and interpretation of reliability indices for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00290.x
  64. Suratno, Umamah, N., Narulita, E., Komaria, N., & Khotimah, K. (2020). The integration of life-based learning based local wisdom in the development of innovative biotechnology learning models. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(12), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I12.15575
  65. Tavakkoli, Z., & Rashidi, N. (2020). A Study on the status of sustainability education among Iranian EFL Instructors: Developing a Glocalized Model. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0017
  66. Thiagarajan, S., S. Semmel, D., & I. Semmel, M. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
  67. Triyuni. (2016). The influence of science learning set using scientific approach and problem solving model on learning outcomes of junior high school students in the subject of heat and temperature. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7679
  68. Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003
  69. Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Peíer, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of preservice teachers in Israel: A comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902928422
  70. Yoo, S.-S., & Jeon, M. (2022). New wine needs to be put into new bottles: Legitimating education for sustainability in South Korea’s higher education institutions. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0021
  71. Yusup, F., Istiqomah, I., & Khairunnisa, K. (2021). Learning methods on environmental education to improve pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy. Journal of Biology Education Research (JBER), 2(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55215/jber.v2i2.4137
  72. Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 63
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Rifqi Rasis, Paidi, Suhartini, Heru Kuswanto, Ratna Dyah Hartanti, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.