Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Willingness to Communicate, Possible Selves, Learner Autonomy, and Academic Target Needs: Implications for Sustainable Development in L2 Pedagogy Cover

Willingness to Communicate, Possible Selves, Learner Autonomy, and Academic Target Needs: Implications for Sustainable Development in L2 Pedagogy

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2008). EAP essentials: A teacher’s guide to principals and practice. Reading UK: Garnet.
  2. Alghamdi, A. K. H., & El-Hassan, W. S. (2019). Raising Saudi students’ (energy) sustainability awareness through ESL–teachers’ thoughts. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(1), 137–154.10.2478/jtes-2019-0011
  3. Al-Murtadha, M. (2019). Enhancing EFL learners’ willingness to communicate with visualization and goal-setting activities. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 1–25.10.1002/tesq.474
  4. Basturkman, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156.10.2307/40264514
  6. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.
  7. Bojare, I. (2016). Autonomous learning for English acquisition in blended e-studies for adults within the context of sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 11–126.10.1515/jtes-2016-0009
  8. Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL program design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 63–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Broady, E., & Kenning, M. M. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy in university language teaching. London: Association for French language studies.
  10. Brown, J. D., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1990). Situation cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.10.3102/0013189X018001032
  11. Cotterall, S., & Crabbe, D. (Eds.). (1999). Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change. New York & Paris: Peter Lang.
  12. Dornyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning Journal, 53(1), 3–32.10.1111/1467-9922.53222
  13. Dornyei, Z. (2005). Motivation and self-motivation. In S. M. Gass, J. Schachter, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The psychology of the language learners (pp. 66–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Dornyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  15. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Eddy-U, M. (2015). Motivation for participation or non-participation in group task: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate. System, 50, 43–55.10.1016/j.system.2015.03.005
  17. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733031
  18. Jamil, M. G. (2010). Promoting learner autonomy on a university course of English for academic purposes: A BRAC university case study. BRAC University Journal, 7(1), 43–52.
  19. Jordan, R. R. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 69–78.10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00004-8
  20. Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292.10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
  21. Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Fatemi, A. H., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180.10.1002/tesq.204
  22. Khaki, S. (2013). The relationship between learner autonomy and willingness to communicate (WTC) in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(5), 98–109.10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.5p.97
  23. Kim, T.-Y. (2009). The sociocultural interface between ideal self and ought-to self: A case study of two Korean students’ ESL motivation. In Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 274–294). Multilingual Matters: Clevedon.
  24. Kong, J. H., Han, J. E., Kim, S., Park, H., Kim, Y. S., & Park, H. Y. (2018). L2 motivational self-system, interactional posture and competitiveness of Korean CTL and LCTL college learners: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 72, 178–189.10.1016/j.system.2017.11.005
  25. Long, M. H. (2005). Overview: A rationale for needs analysis and needs analysis research. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161–171.10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013
  27. MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388.10.1017/S0272263101003035
  28. MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion student’s willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81–96.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x
  29. MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing Willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
  30. Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277–289.10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.008
  31. Meihami, H., & Salīte, I. (2019). EFL teachers’ cultural identity development through participating in cultural negotiation: Probing EFL students’ perspective. Journal of Teacher education for Sustainability, 21(1), 115–127.10.2478/jtes-2019-0009
  32. Munezane, Y. (2015). Enhancing willingness to communicate: Relative effect of visualization and goal setting. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 175–191.10.1111/modl.12193
  33. Noels, K. A. (2003). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. In Z. Dornyei (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning (pp. 97–136). Blackwell: Oxford.
  34. Oz, H., & Bursali, N. (2018). The relationship between L2 motivational self-system and willingness to communicate in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Language and Linguistic studies, 14(4), 1–11.
  35. Oz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2014). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269–275.10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.009
  36. Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self-system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38(3), 467–479.10.1016/j.system.2010.06.011
  37. Peng, J. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 23(3), 33–59.
  38. Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self-system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: Some imagined community perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433–443.10.1007/s40299-014-0195-0
  39. Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
  40. Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioners’ guide. New York: Prentice Hall.
  41. Sato, R. (2017). Fluctuations in an EFL teacher’s willingness to communicate in an English-medium lesson: An observational case study in Japan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2) 105–117. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2017.137550610.1080/17501229.2017.1375506
  42. Scharle, A., & Szabo, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Soodmand Afshar, H., & Movassagh, H. (2016). EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 132–151.10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.002
  44. Taillefer, G. F. (2007). The professional language needs of Economics graduates: Assessment and perspectives in the French context. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 135–155.10.1016/j.esp.2006.06.003
  45. Ushioda, E. (1996). Developing a dynamic concept of motivation. In T. J. Hickey (Ed.), Language, education, and society in a changing world (pp. 239–245). Clevedon, England: Multilingual matters.
  46. Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199–210.10.1080/09588221.2010.538701
  47. Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.10.1111/1540-4781.00136
  48. Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2016). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115–137.10.1177/1362168816657851
  49. Yu, M. (2008). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in a Chinese setting (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.
  50. Yung, K. W. H. (2019). Exploring the L2 selves of senior secondary students in English private tutoring in Hong Kong. System, 80, 120–133.10.1016/j.system.2018.11.003
  51. Zarrinabadi, N., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). Using person-centered future time perspective intervention to enhance EFL learner’s willingness to communicate. RELC Journal, 1–9. doi: 10.1177/0033688217716536.10.1177/0033688217716536
  52. Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2018). To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226–239.10.1016/j.system.2018.01.003
  53. Zhang, L. X., & Li, X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4(1), 15–23.
  54. Zhou, M. (2016). The role of social anxiety, autonomy, and learning orientation in second language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. System, 63, 89–100.10.1016/j.system.2016.09.001
  55. Zygmunt, T. (2016). Language education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(1), 112–124. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0008. Retrieved from https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/dcse/7/1/articlep112.xml10.1515/dcse-2016-0008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 138
Published on: Feb 13, 2020
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Rajab Esfandiari, Sepideh Hesani, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.