Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Generation and Experiencing Daily Routines on Educators’ Training Cover

The Influence of Generation and Experiencing Daily Routines on Educators’ Training

By: Jens Hepper  
Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. Ahlberg, M. (2009). Sustainable development in Sweden – A success story. Discourse analysis. L’Europe en Formation, 2(352), 157–179.10.3917/eufor.352.0157
  2. Alkhawaldeh, A. (2017). School-based teacher training in Jordan: Towards on-school sustainable professional development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(2), 51–68.10.1515/jtes-2017-0014
  3. Anderson, J. (2004). Educating generation Zzz.... Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Bd. 84, Aug. 4, 59–60.
  4. Anyolo, E. O., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinone, T. (2018). Implementing education for sustainable development in Namibia: School teachers’ perceptions and teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 64–81.10.2478/jtes-2018-0004
  5. Dysin, M., & Zink, R. (2007). Educating generation Y in alternate settings: What seems to work. In Annual Conference of AARE, Freemantle, WA, Australia, November 2007.
  6. dpa Hrsg. (2015). Flexibel und fit, digital und öko – Jugend im Wandel. [Adaptive and fit, digital and eco – changing youth]. Retrieved from http://www.sueddeutsche.de/news/leben/familie-flexibel-und-fit-digital-und-oeko---jugend-im-wandel-dpa.urnnewsml-dpa-com-20090101-150522-99-04696, 11 July 2018.
  7. Eckleberry-Hunt, J., & Tucciarone, J. (2011). The challenges and opportunities of teaching “Generation Y”. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 458–461.10.4300/JGME-03-04-15
  8. Eisner, S. P. (2005). Managing Generation Y. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(4), 4–15.
  9. Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Iliško, D., & Ivanova, O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the Anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157–179.10.2478/jtes-2018-0010
  10. Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20–45.10.2478/jtes-2018-0002
  11. Günther, M. (2009). Seelsorge mit jungen Menschen. [Religious counseling with young people]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  12. Helferich, C. (2005). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews. [Quality of qualitative data: A manual for qualitative interviews]. VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
  13. Hepper, J. (2015). Learning by designing learning objects in zoo and wildlife education. International Zoo Educator’s Journal, 70–71.
  14. Hepper, J. (2016). ‹ber die Notwendigkeit eines Paradigmenwechsels der didaktische Betrachtung des Lernorts Bauernhof. [On the neccesity of changing paradigmas of agricultural didactics]. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft, 94(3).
  15. Hepper, J. (2017). Eine Bildungsregion entwickeln und aufbauen. [Developing and building educational areas]. Conference paper, Hochschultage Köln.
  16. Hobar, B. (2008). Understanding generation Y, What you need to know about the millennials. Princeton One White Paper, Solutions, 21, 1–11.
  17. Horx, M. (2015). Selbstbewusster, technikaffiner, verwöhnter. [Self-confident, technicaffine, spoiled]. Retrieved from http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/menschenwirtschaft/studie-ueber-die-jugend-der-generationen-y-und-z-13606504.html, 11 July 2018.
  18. Howe, N. (2016). Meet Mr. and Mrs. Gen X: A new parent generation. Strategies for school leaders when dealing with customer-service expectations, self-interest and stealth-fighter tactics. Retrieved from http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=11122, 18 July 2018.
  19. Iliško, D., Oļehnoviča, E., Ostrovska, I., Akmene, V., & Salīte, I. (2018). Meeting the challenges of ESD competency-based curriculum in a vocational school setting. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 103–113.10.1515/dcse-2017-0019
  20. Kaufmann, M. (2015). Generation Z: Wie Daimler sich auf junge Mitarbeiter vorbereitet. [Generation Z: how Daimler prepares for young employees]. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/karriere/generation-z-wie-daimler-sich-auf-junge-mitarbeitervorbereitet-a-1039136.html, 11 July 2018.
  21. Kunze, J. (2010). Einsatz der Methode Lernen durch Lehren in alters- und stufenhomogenen und heterorgenen Lerngruppe der Berufsschule im Ausbildungsberuf “Tierpfleger/Tierpflegerin” Fachrichtung “Zootierpflege”. [Using the method “learning by teaching” in heterogeneous classes of zoo-keepers]. Written thesis for the teacher state certificate, Hildesheim.
  22. Langner, F. (2011). Fallanalyse. [Case studies]. In S. Reinhardt, & D. Richter (eds.), Politik Methodik. Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.
  23. Lenz, K. (2006). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung – III. Komplex: Qualitative Forschungsmethoden. [Methods of empirical social sciences – III. Qualitative research]. Scriptum, University of Dresden.
  24. Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W. (2006). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung I. [Methods of empirical research]. Scriptum, University Siegen.
  25. Mangels, R. (2003). Die Fikitivtät der Stunde Null, oder: Was tun mit unterschiedlich leistungsstarken Kindern?! [The ficition of the lesson zero, or: what shall we do with students, having various abilities?!]. Scriptum, Institute for Mathematics and Informatics, University of Hanover.
  26. Marotzki, W. (2003). Ausgewählte Methode der Datenerhebung. [Methods of gathering data]. Scriptum, University Magdeburg.
  27. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. [Qualitative content analysis]. Scriptum, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung.
  28. Patel, D. (2017). How to influence Generation Z through education. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/deeppatel/2017/11/30/how-to-influence-generation-z-through-education/#4644970bee50, 11 July 2018.
  29. Pfaff, P., & Köhler, R. (1996). Nicht dem Alltag entfliehen. Alltagsseminare als neue Form geistlichen und gemeinschaftlichen Lebens. [Do not flee everyday life: Everyday-seminars as a new form of spiritual and community living]. Loccumer Pelikan, 40–42.
  30. Rost, J. (2002). Umweltbildung – Bildung fur nachhaltige Entwicklung. Was macht den Unterschied? [Environmental education – Education for Sustainable Development: What is the difference]. ZEP: Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 25, 7–12.
  31. Schleiffer, R. (2014). Der heimliche Wunsch nach Nähe. Bindungstheorie und Heimerziehung. [The secret wish for acceptance: Binding and education in foster homes]. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim und Basel.
  32. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Severing, E. (2001). Modellversuchsforschung und Erkenntnisgewinn – methodische Anmerkungen. [Model research and gaining knowledge]. In Albrecht et al. (eds.), Verankerung von Innovationen in der Modellversuchsroutine – Zur Nachhaltigkeit von Modellversuchen. [Anchoring innovations in model research – The sustainability of model research]. Bonn. Retrieved from https://www.f-bb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Modellversuchsforschung_und_Erkenntnisgewinn__methodische_An.pd, 11 July 2018.
  34. Sit, M. (2008). “Resilienz” – Was Kinder stark macht. [Resilience – strengthening children]. Vienna: Dorner.
  35. Smith, P. (2014). Perceptions of education as an avenue to life course success: Study of millenials. Master Thesis, University of Central Florida.
  36. Tempel, R. (2001). Global denken – lokal handeln. [Think globally – act locally]. Umwelterziehung praktisch, 44, Bad Kreuznach (Germany).
  37. UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education. Towards a global common good? France: UNESCO Publication.
  38. Voigt, M. (2013). Schulentwicklungsprojekte aus neo-institutionalistischer und mikropolitischer Perspektive; eine theorieorientierte Modellentwicklung am Beispiel einer Einzelfallstudie. [Developing schools from a neo-institutional perspective: A theory based model on the base of a single case study]. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
  39. Weihberg, A. (2013). Steigerung des Lernerfolgs durch Unterrichtsverlagerung an einen auflerschulischen Lernort am Beispiel der Bodenansprache in der Einjährigen Fachschule – Agrarwirtschaft. [Increasing the learning success through visiting out of school learning sites]. Written thesis for the teacher state certificate, Hildesheim.
  40. Wilderer, P. A. (2013) Nachhaltigkeit und Resilienz. [Sustainability and resilience]. Emeriti of Excellence Publication, Munich. Retrieved from https://www.emeriti-JensHepperof-excellence.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bpl/www/Vortraege_Highlights-der-Forschung/2013_01_17_Wilderer_Resilienz_Zusammenfassung.pdf, 11 July 2018.
  41. Wolkenhauer, S. (2012) Planung, Durchführung und Evaluation einer Exkursion zum Thema “Freilaufhaltung von Legehennen unter den Bedingungen des ökologischen Landbaus” in der Makrosequenz “Tierische Produkte marktgerecht erzeugen” in einer Berufsfachschule – Agrarwirtschaft – Schwerpunkt Landwirtschaft. [Planning, teaching and evaluating out of school training for free-range keeping of hens under the aspects of ecological agriculture]. Written thesis for the teacher state certificate, Hildesheim.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 100
Published on: Feb 15, 2019
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Jens Hepper, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.