References
- Adam, R. J. (2016). Education for wicked problems and the reconciliation of opposites: A theory of bi-relational development. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Anatole, E. (2013). Generation Z: Rebels with a cause. Forbes, Retrieved June 14, 2018 from https://www.forbes.com/consent/? to URL= https://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2013/05/28/generation-z-rebels-with-a-cause/.
- Aristotelis. (1985). Nikomaha ētika [Nicomachean ethics]. Ríga: Zvaigzne.
- Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first century education: transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56.
- Bogg, J., & Geyer, R. (2007). Complexity, science and society. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
- Carbach, E., & Fischer, D. (2017). Sustainability reporting at schools: challenges and benefits. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 69–81.
- Cutanda, G.-A. (2014). Analysis of Mythical-Metaphorical Narratives as a Resource for Education in the Principles and Values of Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 18–38.
- Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2000–2005). (n.d.) Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001416/141629e.pdf
- Figueroa, A. (2017). Economics of the Anthropocene age. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from https://books.google.lv/books?isbn=3319625845
- Flores, M. A., Santos P., Fernandes, S., & Pereira, D. (2014). Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Their Training: Key Issues to Sustain Quality Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 39–53.
- Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2010). Social exclusion in education: pre-service teachers’ perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12 (1), 85–99.
- Global Action Programme (2015–2020). (n.d.) Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002462/246270e.pdf
- Grišāne, O. (2008). Designing environment for research and learning in secondary school. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 17–31.
- Hauss, C. (2015). Security. 2.0: Dealing with global wicked problems. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (2012). Picturebooks, pedagogy, and philosophy. London: Routledge.
- Heikkurinen, P., Rinkinen, J., Jārvensivu, T., Wilen, K., & Ruuska, T. (2015). Organising in the Anthrocene: An ontological outline for ecocentric theorising. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–10.
- Hendry, A. P. (2017). Eco-evolutionary Dynamics. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Hildebrand, D. L. (2008). Dewey: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld.
- Holland, H. H. (2014). Complexity. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University press.
- Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
- Huckle, J. (2012). Teacher education for sustainability in network society: combining digital and sustainability literacies. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 41–53.
- Hurtman, R. J., Johnson, E., & Hill, M. (2017). Empathetic design: A sustainable approach to school change. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 38–56.
- Jurgena, I., Cēdere, D., & Keviša, I. (2018). The Prospects of transdisciplinary approach to promote learners’ cognitive interest in natural science for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 5–19. DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2018-000110.2478/jtes-2018-0001
- Kabadayi, A. (2016). A suggested in-service training model based on Turkish preschool teachers’ conceptions for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 5–15.
- Kalaitzidis, D. (2012). Sustainable school indicators: approaching the vision through the sustainable school award. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 168–180.
- Kapenieks, J. (2016). Educational action research to achieve the essential competencies of the future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 95–110.
- Kapenieks, J., & Salíte, I. (2012). Action research for creating knowledge in an e-learning environment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 111–129.
- Koopmans, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2016). Complex dynamical systems in education. Concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Kravale-Pauliņa, M., & Oļehnoviča, E. (2015). Human securitability: A participatory action research study involving novice teachers and youngsters. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 91–107.
- Kress, J. W., & Stine J. K. (2017). Living in the Anthropocene: Earth in the Age of Humans. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
- Levickaitė, R. (2010). Generations X, Y, Z: How Social Networks form the Concept of the World without Borders (The Case of Lithuania). Journal LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics, 3 (2).
- Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life to the edge of chaos. 2nd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Miedema, S., & Bertram-Troost, G. (2015). The challenges of global citizenship for worldview education. The perspective of social sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 44–52.
- Millett, D. (2015). Anthropocene: The age of man. North Charleston: A DBA of On-Demand Publishing LLC.
- Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity. A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. New York: Hamton Press.
- Niiniluoto, I. (2002). Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Norman, A. D. (2011). Living with complexity. London: The MIT Press.
- Pace, P. (2010). Self-evaluation as a tool in developing environmental responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(1), 5–26.
- Pētersons, E. (1931). Vispārígā didaktika. Ríga: A. Gulbis.
- Pipere, A., & Salite, I. (2006). Educational action research in Teacher education: Fostering research skills. Journal Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference Educational Research, Policy and Practice in an Era of Globalization. 2830, 2006/11.
- Pipere, A., Veisson, M., & Salīte, I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESD via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 5–43.
- Revonsuo, A. (2006). Consciousness as a Biological Phenomenon. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Reyes, V. C. (2018). Educational research in the age of Anthropocene. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from https://books.google.lv/books?isbn=1522553177
- Salite, I. (1998). An ecocentric paradigm: An important tool for teachers of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 81–85, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the Future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.
- Salīte, I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6, 21–29.
- Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing Education Program Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152.
- Salīte, I., Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(2), 14-30.
- Salumaa, T. (2007). Changes in organizational culture in schools and readiness of teachers for those changes. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 8, 5–13.
- Savio, J.D. (2010). Beyond cultural boundaries – Towards reasoning our mental frameworks. UK: Academy Press.
- Schlossberg, M. (2016). Teen Generation Z is being called ‘millennials on steroids’, and that could be terrifying for retailers. Business Insider UK, February 11, 2016. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from http://uk.businessinsider.com/millennials-vs-genz-2016-2
- Soobik, M. (2014). Teaching Methods Influencing the Sustainability of the Teaching Process in Technology Education in General Education Schools. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 89-101.
- Students, J. (1998). Vispārīgā pedagoģija, 2. daļa. Rīga: RaKa.
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
- Tillmans, T., Holland, C., & Filho, A. S. (2017). Design criteria for visual cues used in disruptive learning interventions within sustainability education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 5–16.
- Tønnessen, M., Oma, K. A., & Rattasepp, S. (2016). Thinking about animals in the age of the Anthropocene. London: Lexington Book.
- Turner, A., (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest, The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2). Texas: The University of Texas Press.
- UN. (1987). Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved June 13, 2018 from: http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/PoliticaExteriorCooperacion/Desarrollosostenible/Documents/Informe%20Brundtland%20(En%20ingl%C3%A9s).pdf
- UN. (2011). Learning for the future: Competences in Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved June 13, 2018 from file:///C:/Users/Dzintra/Desktop/ECE_CEP_AC13_2011_6%20COMPETENCES%20EN.pdf
- Van den Bergh, J., & Behrer, M. (2016). How cool brands stay hot: Branding to Generations Y and Z. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
- Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity. The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster paperbacks.
- Wells, J. (2013). Routledge studies in ecological economics. Complexity and sustainability. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: The Free Press.
- Zunker, V. G. (2012). Eighth edition. Career counseling. A holistic approach. Andover: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Žogla, I. (2001). Didaktikas teorētiskie pamati. Rīga: RaKa.
- Вахтеров, В. П. (1913). Основы новой педагогики. Том 1. Москва: Изданiе (Типо-графiя) Т-ва И. Д. Сытина. Retrieved June 5, 2018 from http://elib.gnpbu.ru/text/vahterov_osnovy-novoy-pedagogiki_1913/fs,1/
- Сапа, А. В. (2014). Поколение z – поколение эпохи фгос, инновационные проекты и программы в образовании. Издательство: Инновации и эксперимент в обра-зовании (Москва), том 2, 24–30 стр. ISSN: 2306-8310.