Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How rural schools in Czechia respond to parental preferences: Different approaches to students’ well-being Cover

How rural schools in Czechia respond to parental preferences: Different approaches to students’ well-being

Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. Bagley, C., & Hillyard, S. (2015). School choice in an English village: living, loyalty and leaving. Ethnography and Education, 10(3), 278–292.
  2. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (2014). Multifaceted concept of child well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes, & J. E. Korbin, Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (pp. 1–28). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht.
  3. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools [Online]. Index, Bristol, England: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. Retrieved August, 20, 2022 from https://www.eenet.org.uk/resources/docs/Index%20English.pdf
  4. Burke, J., & Minton, S. J. (2019). Well-being in post-primary schools in Ireland: the assessment and contribution of character strengths. Irish Educational Studies, 38(2), 177–192.
  5. Butler, T., & van Zanten, A. (2007). School choice: A European perspective. Journal of Educational Policy, 22(1), 1–5.
  6. Chromý, P., Jančák, V., Marada, M., & Havlíček, T. (2011). Venkov – žitý prostor: Regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v Česku. Geografie, 116(1), 23–45.
  7. Cucchiara, M. B., & Horvat, E. M. N. (2014). Choosing selves: The salience of parental identity in the school choice process. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 486–509.
  8. Cuervo, H. (2016). Understanding social justice in rural education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Dvořák, D., Starý, K., & Urbánek, P. (2015). Škola v globální době: proměny pěti českých základních škol. Prague, Czechia: Charles University, Karolinum.
  10. Edwards, D. S. (2021). Over the river and through the woods: The role of distance in participation in rural school choice. Journal of School Choice, 15(4), 624–654.
  11. Frugoli, P. A., Almeida, C. M. V. B., Agostinho, F., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Can measures of well-being and progress help societies to achieve sustainable development?. Journal of Cleaner Production, (90), 370–380.
  12. Gottau, V. (2020). Private school choice and post-materialism: What values are at stake?. In A. W. Wiseman (Ed.), Annual review of comparative and international education 2019: (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 39), (pp. 305–319). Bingley, England: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  13. Gristy, C., Hargreaves, L., & Kučerová, S. R., (Eds.) (2020). Educational research and schooling in rural Europe: An engagement with changing patterns of education, space, and place. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  14. Gulosino, C., & Liebert, J. (2020). Examining variation within the charter school sector: Academic achievement in suburban, urban, and rural charter schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(3), 300–329.
  15. Gulosino, C., & Yoon, E.S. (2020). School choice policies shaping neighborhoods, school locations, and destinies. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(3), 203–210.
  16. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2018). Well-being and success: Opposites that need to attract. Retrieved November 13, 2022, from EdCan Network website: https://www.edcan.ca/articles/well-being-and-success/
  17. Havlínová, M. (Ed.). (1998). Program podpory zdraví ve škole: rukověť projektu Zdravá škola (1st ed.). Prague, Czechia: Portál.
  18. Jennings, J. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.
  19. Jessen, S. B., & DiMartino, C. (2020). Rearranging the chairs on the deck or true reform? Private sector bureaucracies in the age of choice – an analysis of autonomy and control. Educational Policy, 34(1), 239–260.
  20. Kučerová, S. R., Bláha, J. D., & Pavlasová, Z. (2015). Malé venkovské školy na trhu se základním vzděláváním: Jejich působnost a marketing na příkladu Turnovska. Sociologický časopis, 51(4), 607–636.
  21. Kučerová, S. R., Dvořák, D., Meyer, P., & Bartůněk, M. (2020). Dimensions of centralization and decentralization in the rural educational landscape of post-socialist Czechia. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 280−293.
  22. Kučerová, S. R., Meyer, P., Kučera, Z., Rybová, K., & Šmíd, J. (2022). Venkovská základní škola: Rozmanitost typů v různorodých venkovech. Geografie, 127(1), 67–90.
  23. Le Feuvre, L., Hogan, A., Thompson, G., & Mockler, N. (2021). Marketing Australian public schools: the double bind of the public school principal. Asia Pacific Journal of Education.
  24. Lubienski, C. (2006). School diversification in second-best education markets: international evidence and conflicting theories of change. Educational Policy, 20(2), 323–344.
  25. Majerová, V. (2005). Teoretické přístupy k rozvoji venkova. In V. Majerová (Ed.), Český venkov 2005: Rozvoj venkovské společnosti (pp. 9–18). Prague, Czechia: Czech University of Life Sciences.
  26. Mareš, J. (2010). Kvalita života žáků a škola. Pedagogika SK, 1(1), 47–72.
  27. Nejedlá, M., & Reissmannová, J. (2015). Program Škola podporující zdraví. Prague, Czechia: First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University.
  28. Nekorjak, M., Souralová, A., & Vomastková, K. (2011). Uvíznutí v marginalitě: Vzdělávací trh, „romské školy“ a reprodukce sociálně prostorových nerovností. Sociologický časopis, 47(4), 657–680.
  29. OECD. (2017). Are students happy?: PISA 2015 Results: Students’ Well-Being [Online] (Vol. 2015). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved November, 15, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-in-Focus-No-71-Are-students-happy.pdf
  30. OECD. (2019). CORE FOUNDATIONS FOR 2030: OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework [Online]. OECD. Retrieved August, 20, 2022, from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/core-foundations/Core_Foundations_for_2030_concept_note.pdf
  31. Polouček, O. (2020). Kontinuity v období „revolučních proměn“ a „soumraku selského stavu“ (příspěvek ke studiu života na venkově v socialistickém Československu). Slovenský národopis, 68(1), 29–46.
  32. Potterton, A. U., Edwards, D. B., Yoon, E. S., & Powers, J. M. (2020). Sociological contributions to school choice policy and politics around the globe: Introduction to the 2020 PEA Yearbook. Educational Policy, 34(1), 3–20.
  33. Prokop, D., & Dvořák, D. (2019). Analýza výzev vzdělávání v České republice (1st ed.). Prague, Czechia: Eduzměna - nadační fond. Retrieved from https://www.eduzmena.cz/src/Frontend/Files/FileExtend/source/file1629457367.pdf
  34. Ramos Lobato, I., Bernelius, V., & Kosunen, S. (2018). Looking for the ordinary? Parental choice and elite school avoidance in Finland and Germany. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(3), 156–167.
  35. Raveaud, M., & van Zanten, A. (2007). Choosing the local school: Middle class parents‘ values and social and ethnic mix in London and Paris. Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 107–124.
  36. Ribchester, Ch., & Edwards, B. (1999). The centre and the local: Policy and practice in rural education provision. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(1), 49–63.
  37. Roberts, P., & Green, B. (2013). Researching rural places: On social justice and rural education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 765−774.
  38. Rodríguez-Rosa, M., Gallego-Álvarez, I., Vicente-Galindo, M. P., & Galindo-Villardón M. P. (2017). Are social, economic, and environmental well-being equally important in all countries around the world? A study by income levels. Social Indicators Research, 131, 543–565.
  39. Savage, G. C. (2012). Being different and the same? The paradoxes of “tailoring” in education quasi-markets. Journal of Pedagogy, 3(2), 279–302.
  40. Simonová, J. (2017). Charakteristiky dobré základní školy z pohledu rodičů. Pedagogická orientace, 27(1), 136–159.
  41. Smith Slámová, R. (2021). Únik ze spádových škol: Obavy rodičů z „běžné školy“ při nástupu dítěte do 1. třídy. Pedagogika, 71(3), 457–482.
  42. Solstad, K. J., & Andrews, T. (2020). From rural to urban to rural to global: 300 years of compulsory schooling in rural Norway. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 294−303.
  43. Straková, J., & Simonová, J. (2015). Výběr základní školy v ČR a faktory, které jej ovlivňují. Sociologický časopis, 51(4), 587–606.
  44. Tam, C. W. L. (2002). Parental choice of private primary schools in Hong Kong (Doctoral dissertation). Leicester, England.
  45. Woods, M. (2010). Rural (1st ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  46. Yoon, E.-S., Grima, V., E., Barrett DeWiele, C., & Skelton. L. (2022). The impact of school choice on school (re)segregation: Settler-colonialism, critical geography and Bourdieu. Comparative Education, 58(1), 52–71.
  47. Young, I., St Leger, L., & Buijs, G. (2013). School health promotion: evidence for effective action. Background paper SHE Factsheet 2. Retrieved December, 15. 2012 from CBO website: https://www.schoolsforhealth.org/sites/default/files/editor/fact-sheets/she-factsheet-2-school-health-promotion-evidence.pdf
  48. Zancajo, A. (2020). Schools in the marketplace: Analysis of school supply responses in the Chilean education market. Educational Policy, 34(1), 43–64.
  49. van Zanten, A. (2009). Competitive arenas and schools’ logics of action: A European comparison. Compare, 39(1), 85–98.
  50. Zilcher, L., & Svoboda, Z. (2019). Inkluzivní vzdělávání: Efektivní vzdělávání všech žáků. Prague, Czechia: Grada.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2022-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 105 - 127
Published on: Jan 14, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Zdeněk Svoboda, Dominik Dvořák, Ladislav Zilcher, Jan Šmíd, Silvie R. Kučerová, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.