Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Second Language Acquisition of the English Dative Alternation by Native Speakers of Arabic Cover

Second Language Acquisition of the English Dative Alternation by Native Speakers of Arabic

Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions, Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/oso/9780195091342.001.0001
  2. Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Issues in Second Language Research, ERIC.
  3. Gil, K. H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 117-149.10.1075/lab.3.2.01gil
  4. Goad, H. & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22, 243-268.10.1191/0267658306sr268oa
  5. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The emergence of language, 197-212.
  7. Green, G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity, Indiana University Press.
  8. Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. & Wilson, R. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 203-257.10.2307/415332
  9. Hamdan, J. (1997). The acquisition of the dative alternation UG markedness or L1 transfer? Dirasat. Human and social sciences, 24.
  10. Hawkins, R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 20-55.10.1177/026765838700300104
  11. Ibn S-Saraaj, M. B. S. (1996). Al-Aušool fi Al-Nahwi, Beirut, Al-Resalah Publishers.
  12. Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐ Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English. Language Learning, 47, 637-669.10.1111/0023-8333.00024
  13. Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition, Routledge.10.4324/9780203935927
  14. Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In: Liceras J, Zobl H and Goodluck, H. (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum, 106-40.10.4324/9781315085340-5
  15. Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173-227.10.1177/0267658308100283
  16. Lardiere, D. (2013). Linguistic approaches to second language morphosyntax. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 106-126). Routledge.
  17. Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry, 335-391.
  18. Lefebvre, C., White, L. & Jourdan, C. 2006. L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: dialogues, John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lald.42
  19. Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language learning, 34, 91-108.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00997.x
  20. Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 7, 15-35.10.1017/S0272263100005131
  21. Miyagawa, S. & Tsujioka, T. (2004). Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 1-38.10.1023/B:JEAL.0000007345.64336.84
  22. Oehrle, R. T. (1976). The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  23. Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 407-439.10.1177/0267658310365786
  24. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition : the acquisition of argument structure, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  25. Sawyer, M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1996. 646-657.
  26. Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research, 12, 40-72.10.1177/026765839601200103
  27. Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22-47.10.1177/026765839300900102
  28. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527678
  29. Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4
  30. White, L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies, 1, 189-207.10.1017/S0959269500000983
  31. Whong-Barr, M. & Schwartz, B. D.(2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579-616.10.1017/S0272263102004035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2018-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1339-4584 | Journal ISSN: 1339-4045
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 88
Published on: Sep 18, 2018
Published by: SlovakEdu, o.z.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Anwar S. Aljadani, published by SlovakEdu, o.z.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.