Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Where next for the discipline of nematology? Trends and implications for workforce sustainability, disease diagnostics, and biosecurity Cover

Where next for the discipline of nematology? Trends and implications for workforce sustainability, disease diagnostics, and biosecurity

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Genealogy of nematology training in the United States (after Webster et al., 2008). Eastern, Western, and independent branches are illustrated and the central role of mentorship networks in workforce formation is highlighted. Color codes match the connection to the founder (Image created with BioRender).

Table 1

Change in the membership of the SON by United States university between 2009 and 2024

graphic/j_jofnem-2026-0035_fx_001.jpg
graphic/j_jofnem-2026-0035_fx_002.jpg
Figure 2

Distribution of United States nematology members by cluster areas in 2024. (Created in ArcGIS Online.).

Table 2

Faculty composition and the membership of the SON change at selected United States institutions (2009–2024)

Name of institutionMembership change (in #)Name of the departmentProfessor rankAssoc. Prof. rankAss. (Research) Prof. rankEmeritus status/courtesy appt.Total
Michigan State University2–9Department of Entomology -Applied Nematology, Ecology and Acoustical Signatures00112
Oregon State University3–7Department of Botany and Plant Pathology00134
University of California Riverside17–20Department of Nematology513211
University of California Davis9–14Department of Entomology and Nematology21104
University of Arkansas3–6Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology00123
University of Florida13–28Entomology and Nematology Department24219
University of Hawaii-Manoa6–11Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences20002
University of Idaho2–10Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Nematology10001

Discrepancies between faculty numbers and membership totals highlight the extent to which some programs rely on student-heavy or emeritus-heavy structures.

Table 3

Regional coordinators for widely prevalent plant-parasitic nematodes in the United States

Regional coordinators for prevalent PPNs
No.InstitutionName of coordinatorStates covered
1New Mexico State UniversityJacqueline Beacham (retired)AZ, NM, NV
2University of TennesseeErnest C. BernardKY, TN
3University of MinnesotaSenyu ChenMN
4University of GeorgiaIntiaz ChowdhuryGA
5Montana State UniversityAlan DyerMT, WY
6Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityJonathan D. EisenbackVA
7University of ArkansasTravis FaskeAR, MO
8University of IdahoRetiredID
9Penn State UniversityMihail KantorPA
10Clemson UniversityChuramani KhanalSC
11University of DelawareAlyssa KoehlerDE
12West Virginia UniversityRetiredWV
13Mississippi State UniversityGary Lawrence (retired)MS
14Auburn UniversityKathy LawrenceAll
15The Ohio State UniversityHoracio Lopez-NicoraOH
16University of Wisconsin-MadisonAnn MacGuidwin (retired)WI
17University of Rhode IslandNathaniel MitkowskiRI
18University of VermontDeborah Neher.(retired)VT
19Utah State UniversityClaudia NischwitzUT
20Cornell UniversitySarah Jane PethybridgeNY
21University of Nebraska-LincolnThomas PowersAK, CO, ME, NE, NJ, UT
22Michigan State UniversityMarisol QuintanillaMI
23University of IllinoisNathan SchroederIL
24Kansas State UniversityWilliam RutterKS
25Iowa State UniversityGregory TylkaIA
26University of HawaiiKoon-Hui WangHI
27Texas A&M UniversityTerry WheelerOK, TX
28North Dakota State UniversityGuiping YanND, SD
29North Carolina State UniversityWeimin YeNC
30Purdue UniversityLei ZhangIN
31Louisiana State University AgCenterTristan WatsonAll
32Connecticut Agricultural Experiment StationRaquel RochaCT, MA, NH
33USDA ARSPaulo VieiraDC, MD
34Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer ServicesJason StanleyFL
35California Department of Food and AgricultureSergei SubbotinCA
36USDA ARSRetiredOR, WA
Figure 3

Quadrant analysis of nematology research topics based on output and prominence (SciVal, Elsevier). Dashed lines indicate the median split for output and prominence. Data source: SciVal Elsevier; accessed September 19, 2025.

Figure 4

Nematology pipeline conceptual synthesis. How education and training (Panel A), sustained by institutional anchors (Panel B), generate functional agricultural or forest health outputs (Panel C) that reduce risk across agricultural, natural, socioeconomic, and geopolitical systems (Panel E) is illustrated. Failure points (Panel D), including retirements without replacement, departmental consolidation, loss of systematics and taxonomy expertise, automation without ground truth, and inadequate recognition and support, disrupt continuity and amplify vulnerability across all outputs. Panels are vertically aligned to emphasize parallel, interdependent components rather than a strictly linear sequence. (Image created with BioRender.).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2026-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 573 - 590
Submitted on: Apr 6, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 19, 2026
Published on: Oct 19, 2026
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Camelia Kantor, Jonathan D. Eisenback, Inga Zasada, Mihail Kantor, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.